Kings active in trade talks?
- Thread starter The_Jamal
- Start date
- Status
I repeat, the kings signed a player that gives them nothing the team needs. Sign an assistant coach like Corliss if you need a ra ra guy to sing kumbaya in the locker room. That costs a lot less than 26 million.
The problem is, if you sign a team of Carl landrys, you end up with the team we have now. It's not very good. Hayes, salmons, outlaw, Thornton, and maybe JT. All avg players slightly overpaid. Now Landry. You sign a team of limited players, you get a limited team.
That is absolutely not the same as saying he's a worthless player. I'm sorry you lack both comprehension and reading skills.
The problem is, if you sign a team of Carl landrys, you end up with the team we have now. It's not very good. Hayes, salmons, outlaw, Thornton, and maybe JT. All avg players slightly overpaid. Now Landry. You sign a team of limited players, you get a limited team.
That is absolutely not the same as saying he's a worthless player. I'm sorry you lack both comprehension and reading skills.
Last edited:
Yeah, and they immediately cleared Landry out to make room for cousins.
Bottom line, they got a backup pf before getting the starter. That's my huge problem with it. Sure in 2-3 years he might be a nice piece off the bench. But that's hardly priority 1.
Hayes was also brought in to be the locker room presence if I recall. How's that going?
But anyway, beating a dead horse here.
Bottom line, they got a backup pf before getting the starter. That's my huge problem with it. Sure in 2-3 years he might be a nice piece off the bench. But that's hardly priority 1.
Hayes was also brought in to be the locker room presence if I recall. How's that going?
But anyway, beating a dead horse here.
I don't love the Landry signing, but I like what he can bring ONLY if he is a third big super-sub. Landry is a pretty good and efficient post player, but he is not dominant like Cousins. The both prefer the same space on the court, so I see Landry as the guy you bring in when Cousins needs a breather.
You just have to find the rim protecting PF/C somewhere out there who can play with both Landry and Cousins in a 3 big rotation.
You just have to find the rim protecting PF/C somewhere out there who can play with both Landry and Cousins in a 3 big rotation.
Jimmer to Chicago Bulls?
http://sports.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474981965845
http://sports.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474981965845
That's not exactly a trade rumor. It's more of a "Jimmer kinda makes sense for the Bulls now that Rose is out" speculation. Not even any thoughts about what might come back the other way. Jimmer to the Bulls could conceivably happen, but I don't think this article indicates anything is on the burners, it just looks like random musing.
Since you just watched that game I have a question. It seems I remember Sergio Rodriguez sparking the very beginning of that great comeback. Am I right?
Maybe the Kings can get Spanish Chocolate: http://elcontraataque.es/2013/12/03...r-el-real-madrid-cuando-acabe-esta-temporada/
Maybe the Kings can get Spanish Chocolate: http://elcontraataque.es/2013/12/03...r-el-real-madrid-cuando-acabe-esta-temporada/
Defensively he certainly is. That would be the theory though. They are in entirely different classes of players. Grevis is Calderon without the shot. Pure PG who can run things impact free. Hinrich's a roleplayer. 3 and D, direct the offense, almost never have much direct productivity, just make sure the right guys do. Its an apples and oranges case.
- Status