Some tweets about the hearing:
Aaron Bruski @aaronbruski
However this goes down, there are a cornucopia of quotes by Hansen and SEA attorneys regarding the lack of a final arena deal
Chris Daniels @ChrisDaniels5
BREAKING: North didn't even hesitate. Clearly he had already made his decision. (North was the judge)
Aaron Bruski @aaronbruski
This means that ILWU will have to wait until a later date to challenge the EIR process.
Carmichael Dave @CarmichaelDave
In the end, Sacramento will retain the Kings based on the strength and merits of its OWN proposal, not the weakness of Seattle's.
Shawn Borin @bgpappa
So Hansen wins, but because there is no legal binding decision. So he won in Court, but how is Stern looking at it. (emphasis mine)
Retweeted by Crown Downtown
Carmichael Dave @CarmichaelDave
What WILL be significant about today? If KJ gets all ducks in a row, Sac will have leg up in "shovels in the ground" argument to NBA
Chris Daniels @ChrisDaniels5
ILWU Attorney Mann - This not a done deal. But no plans as of right now to appeal.
Carmichael Dave @CarmichaelDave
But Sac is a year removed from their council cutting a check, with a state law streamlining enviro rulings as opposed to I-91. Big ad- Sac
Chris Daniels @ChrisDaniels5
ILWU Attorney Mann expressed disappointment in decision, says NBA should pay attention to KC/Sea admission #SeattleArena deal isn’t done.
Aaron Bruski @aaronbruski
As I wrote, I think it's a tightrope SEA can walk, but procedural advantages SAC has due to new EIR law give them head start
Dale Kasler @dakasler
I'm told by @McCannSportsLaw that Hansen's insistence there isn't a done deal for arena probably won't come back to haunt him with NBA