Not sure what you mean by "circumvent" in this instance ("taking the argument out of the equation" - I assume you mean this), but if the owners were planning to spend enough on players (and it sounds like they are), then this is a moot point. As others have mentioned, if this is the case they weren't going to receive the payments anyways. They are likely effectively giving up nothing but scoring "brownie points" for promising to do it.
Precisely!
If the ownership group are planning to spent and put a winning product on the floor, then they will NOT be getting any income from revenue sharing anyway. If you have a team that is close to or actually paying luxury tax, you are not part of the revenue sharing.
I am not worried about this one bit. In fact it is a very smart move by the ownership group. Give up something that we likely would not have taken anyway in order to score some brownie points with those that thing revenue sharing is a big deal.
This whole transaction is MUCH MUCH bigger than the Kings. This is about the realestate money that will get generated here. The money that these guys will cash in from the redevelopment of the down town will more than make up for their buying price of the franchise. Remember, they are cashing out $341 million and not $525 million. They will get back 3 times that amount once its all said and done.
We will take reduced amount while we are still playing at STA but once the arena is built and the redevelopment around it starts kicking off, we wouldn't have received anything from the revenue sharing anyway.