Reread my post.
Ah, okay.
If your point is that Evans and Collison are both turnover-prone scorers, then we're in agreement.
Which is also why I didn't really care for the trade.
Reread my post.
Just some blogger trying to SELL high his rookie(Collison) and buy low our rookie(Casspi).
You're always cursing![]()
I would like to have Collison around, but I don't know if I'd want to do that at the expense of Omri. Right now our future at the SF is up in the air enough that I would rather see how it plays out than ship one of the candidates out early. Especially as there's no indication as of yet that we plan to move Tyreke off of the PG slot, so Collison would be relegated to a backup role.
Maybe if we land a Cousins/Favors-type guy in the draft, we could ship off Thompson/Hawes for Collison, which would free up some minutes at the post, then play ~10 minutes a game with a Collison/Evans backcourt (giving Collison all the backup minutes at the PG). Could be interesting. I was high on Collison in college, and now that he's doing it at the NBA level, he'll be a tough piece to pry away. Chris Paul is the only reason he'd even be available.
I read up until whoever wrote that said Evans played better OFF THE BALL..
Bullcrap.. The guy obviously does not know Evans game.. In college he was notorious for NEEDING the ball to be effective (not to mention this year with the Kings).. They did the standard PG/SG thing at Memphis for the first few games and how well did that work out? It didn't start to get good until we had Evans controlling the ball with a great two man game with Anderson. We need another ball handler in the back court, but I don't think a prototypical PG would make the team any better. It would be nice to have a couple of combo guards where one is good with the ball (i.e. Evans) and one is good without the ball.. Who the guy we get who's good without the ball is yet to be determined. That's why I was for the whole "Bring Anderson in for a tryout" thing.. Because I know he's good without the ball. We already have one D-Leaguer from Memphis (Dorsey) so why not bring in Anderson for the heck of it maybe during the summer. It's win win because he wouldn't cost much, and we already know he can play D, pass, handle the ball, and play well with Evans. Would be a cost effective stopgap measure.
Do you really see Tyreke and Collison in the same backcourt? I just don't see it. The easiest argument against that combo is no longer is there a Tyreke matchup problem for the other team. Just give me Turner in the draft...
The maloofs aren't giving up their marketing gold mine.
The Hornets would do this deal in a heartbeat, and then laugh about it.
I read up until whoever wrote that said Evans played better OFF THE BALL..
Bullcrap.. The guy obviously does not know Evans game.. In college he was notorious for NEEDING the ball to be effective (not to mention this year with the Kings).. They did the standard PG/SG thing at Memphis for the first few games and how well did that work out? It didn't start to get good until we had Evans controlling the ball with a great two man game with Anderson. We need another ball handler in the back court, but I don't think a prototypical PG would make the team any better. It would be nice to have a couple of combo guards where one is good with the ball (i.e. Evans) and one is good without the ball.. Who the guy we get who's good without the ball is yet to be determined. That's why I was for the whole "Bring Anderson in for a tryout" thing.. Because I know he's good without the ball. We already have one D-Leaguer from Memphis (Dorsey) so why not bring in Anderson for the heck of it maybe during the summer. It's win win because he wouldn't cost much, and we already know he can play D, pass, handle the ball, and play well with Evans. Would be a cost effective stopgap measure.
......
What this team needs is a new Doug Christie.
This is far from the first (and certainly won't be the last) trade proposal suggesting that the Kings put a "traditional" PG next to Tyreke and slide him over to the 2.
Why on earth would this team take the ball out of his hands and remove his size advantage against opposing PGs?
No, IMO the team doesn't need to be looking for a small, pass-first PG to run the team. What they need is a good sized SG with a defensive mindset and the ability to square up and hit outside shots as well as handle and pass the ball.
What this team needs is a new Doug Christie.