D-Mass
Starter
I would, but Charlotte wouldn't.Ryle said:Would anyone else(besides me) trade Peja for Wallace staight up??? Blame the coach for losing him because he wouldn't play him.
I would, but Charlotte wouldn't.Ryle said:Would anyone else(besides me) trade Peja for Wallace staight up??? Blame the coach for losing him because he wouldn't play him.
Too sinking funny. lol.Ryle said:Would anyone else(besides me) trade Peja for Wallace staight up??? Blame the coach for losing him because he wouldn't play him.
D-Mass said:Yeah...let's get back to that!![]()
KP said:It would have been Ok if Peja could have stepped up, but it just hasn't happened. We are stuck with those other 3 contracts now.. Petrie(or the Maloofs) picked the wrong guy.
I know.. it's sad but true... I was really wrong about Mike, Peja, and Brad, and their ability to step up and lead this team.AleksandarN said:No Petrie and the Maloofs pick the wrong core. This is team is going no where with the core we have now. One trade is not going to get it done. We need to two if not all three of the core if we are going to go anywhere.
Mr. S£im Citrus said:Well, let's see:
As polarizing a figure as Webber was in a Kings uniform, that trade was equally polarizing. After disregarding the people that wanted Webber gone because they just plain didn't like him, the greater majority of those who endorsed the trade did so because they felt that Webber would never regain anything close to his old form, and would never be able to be a factor on a good team.Code:FG% FT% OFF REB AST TO STL BLK PPG Kenny Thomas 44.4 76.6 1.1 4.0 1.4 1.0 0.3 0.4 6.1 Corliss Williamson 48.3 66.7 0.5 1.6 0.2 1.1 0.3 0.1 3.5 Brian Skinner 69.2 50.0 0.6 1.9 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 2.8 Chris Webber 42.3 86.3 2.4 10.1 3.5 2.4 1.2 0.9 19.3
Meanwhile, Webber is a very important cog in the Atlantic Division-leading Philadelphia 76ers, and the Kings are in last place in the Pacific. And, oh yeah, Webber's numbers are, across the board, superior to the three guys he was traded for... combined.
So, my offhand guess would be that people are going to continue re-hashing the trade until those numbers are reversed... you might as well grab a Snickers, boss, because this debate ain't going nowhere for a while...
Word up.Ryle said:WORD
It also makes it worse because the reason they traded away Webb was to appease Peja and he has really turned out to be the weak tit that most people thought he was.
Mr. S£im Citrus said:Do you have to ask?
Ryle said:WORD
It also makes it worse because the reason they traded away Webb was to appease Peja and he has really turned out to be the weak tit that most people thought he was. This "core" that we have is flawed and I'm not sure why we decided to build around those three.
AleksandarN said:That was not reseason why he was traded. Yes Pedja sucks right now but blaming Pedja for Webber trade is wrong. Blame Pedja for the games like tonight.
AleksandarN said:That was not reseason why he was traded. Yes Pedja sucks right now but blaming Pedja for Webber trade is wrong. Blame Pedja for the games like tonight.
A little misleading. How bout showing numbers with their minutes equaling webber's mins. I'm not saying the trade was good, but the stats aren't accurate.Mr. S£im Citrus said:Code:
FG% FT% OFF REB AST TO STL BLK PPG
Kenny Thomas 44.4 76.6 1.1 4.0 1.4 1.0 0.3 0.4 6.1
Corliss Williamson 48.3 66.7 0.5 1.6 0.2 1.1 0.3 0.1 3.5
Brian Skinner 69.2 50.0 0.6 1.9 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 2.8
Chris Webber 42.3 86.3 2.4 10.1 3.5 2.4 1.2 0.9 19.3
Well, how I wish the trade could be reversed. But that cant happen. Hey, here's a novel idea...instead of throwing Martin, Hart and Garcia in the game as your first 3 options off the bench Rick, why not give CONSISTENT minutes to Corliss, Brian and Kenny....thats the only way for them to be active enough to contribute. These guys arent 'spot' type of players, but if they were our 'bench crew', then they would get 10-20 minutes a game a piece...just my 4 cents.thesanityannex said:A little misleading. How bout showing numbers with their minutes equaling webber's mins. I'm not saying the trade was good, but the stats aren't accurate.
AleksandarN said:No Petrie and the Maloofs pick the wrong core. This is team is going no where with the core we have now. One trade is not going to get it done. We need to two if not all three of the core if we are going to go anywhere.
nbrans said:^and this on the night that SAR scored 32 points. But hey, maybe Webber's coming back...
GoGoGadget said:Same difference. Pick the other "guy" and our "core" going into the year is Mike, Webb and Brad.
thesanityannex said:A little misleading. How bout showing numbers with their minutes equaling webber's mins. I'm not saying the trade was good, but the stats aren't accurate.
I realize we aren't better without Webber. I just don't think its fair to compare their productivity when they (the webber three) are not getting time to play. Compare their combined minutes to his. I'd really like to see these guys get the minutes instead of Hart, Garcia, Martin.Mr. S£im Citrus said:I disagree; the stats are quite acurate indeed, in terms of the argument. But, if you think that you can use per-48 or whatever to validate the trade then, by all means, be my guest.
The whole point of the stats were to make the case that we are not, in fact, better off without Webber, and that AFAIC bringing the trade up every time we take a point is legitimate.
And even if it was a really bad trade and anyone who said so then or says so now is 100% correct? So what? The prize is the satisfaction of saying I/you/we were right? Anyone/everyone/someone being right isn't going to help my beloved Kings at all. Its Pyrrhic victory, at best.Mr. S£im Citrus said:The whole point of the stats were to make the case that we are not, in fact, better off without Webber, and that AFAIC bringing the trade up every time we take a point is legitimate.
what does it tell exactly? all that is tells me is that adelman doesn't know how to use them.GoGoGadget said:The fact that the combined minutes of all three of the trade pieces don't equal the minutes that would have gone to Webb alone is already a pretty telling stat.
GoGoGadget said:The fact that the combined minutes of all three of the trade pieces don't equal the minutes that would have gone to Webb alone is already a pretty telling stat.
nbrans said:^and this on the night that SAR scored 32 points. But hey, maybe Webber's coming back...
GoGoGadget said:Same difference. Pick the other "guy" and our "core" going into the year is Mike, Webb and Brad.
bad comparison. bonzi didn't play. thats like webb without his vlade.Padrino said:and that is the fundamental difference between webber and rahim. rahim can score 32 points and his team can lose rather easily. rahim's numbers are pretty, and i appreciate his effort and efficiency much more than i appreciate peja's penchant for not showing up, but numbers don't tell an entire story. rahim can score 32, but he won't change the momentum of a game while doing it. webber was (key word..."was") the kind of player who would take a team on his shoulders, demand the ball, and rip a team's heart out with intense moves to the basket. rahim's all finesse. he has none of the swagger that webber posseses. that's not necessarily a bad thing, but on a team full of softies, its certainly not a hot commodity.
kennadog said:And even if it was a really bad trade and anyone who said so then or says so now is 100% correct? So what? The prize is the satisfaction of saying I/you/we were right? Anyone/everyone/someone being right isn't going to help my beloved Kings at all. Its Pyrrhic victory, at best.
KP said:I know.. it's sad but true... I was really wrong about Mike, Peja, and Brad, and their ability to step up and lead this team.
thesanityannex said:what does it tell exactly? all that is tells me is that adelman doesn't know how to use them.