Vlad said:I don't think Bibby/KG would be all that much better than KG/Cassell was in 2004 when the wolves went to the WCF
Well, if Bibby/KG wont be all that much better, then it might be a little better. A little better then WCF is NBA champions, so in VF IMAX style I dream also.Vlad said:I don't think Bibby/KG would be all that much better than KG/Cassell was in 2004 when the wolves went to the WCF
But it puts you right ojn the brink, and unlike Cassel, Bibby's got YEARS ahead fo him. Bonzi is also there to be Spree, in mor ways than one. And all of a sudden you are an elite WCF type team that is literally one player away. And because your main guys are all in their prime you are going to be right there for the next 5 years or so knocking on the door. Hard to beat that kind of situation.Vlad said:I don't think Bibby/KG would be all that much better than KG/Cassell was in 2004 when the wolves went to the WCF
Bricklayer said:But it puts you right ojn the brink, and unlike Cassel, Bibby's got YEARS ahead fo him. Bonzi is also there to be Spree, in mor ways than one. And all of a sudden you are an elite WCF type team that is literally one player away. And because your main guys are all in their prime you are going to be right there for the next 5 years or so knocking on the door. Hard to beat that kind of situation.
Vlad said:Even with Garnett, Bibby, and Wells, who do we put at the 2 other positions (SF, PF/C). Thomas and Skinner? And who comes off the bench? Evans and Hart? I think we are still behind the following teams (in no particular order)
Detroit (Wallace, Wallace, Prince, Hamilton, Billups)
Indiana (O'Neal, Artest, Jackson, Tinsley, deep bench)
San Antonio (Duncan, Parker, Ginobili)
Phoenix (Nash, Stoudamire, Marion, and Johnson, if he stays)
We'd probably be on the Dallas/Houston/New Jersey level(assuming the SAR deal works out). I'm not saying it wouldn't be an improvement, just not that much of one. Plus, Minnesota would never ever do it.
Bricklayer said:You are ignoring the very recent Cassel/KG history. That was a 58 win team. A WCF team. Soemthing that the Kings have managed to pull off exactly once in their entire Sacramento existence. And the KG/Bibby/Bonzi combo is EVERY bit as good as KG/Cassel/Spree, and a hell of a lot younger. As I mentioned, you are then one piece away. One. You are knocking on the door. One good trade, one wise use of the MLE, and you're home. And you've got 4-5 years to pull it off. In the meantime you've got the league's leading rebounder, best passing big man, and first team all defense member to completely anchor you and cover a host of your sins, and a very good GM to find that one extra piece.
Lot of wear and tear, and yet Mailmanesque durability. Given his build and the fact he does in fact jump, in some ways perhaps even more remarkable. His games played in the last 6 years: 81, 81, 81, 82, 82, 82. Amazing. That alone probably means we have no interest in trading for him though.SacTownKid said:KG at 35 may be an ugly thing. That guy has a LOT of mileage on that body of his. I do agree that it would be a good team for the next 3 years for sure.
captain bill said:Anyone who would say no to trading Peja/Miller or any other combo of 2 of the 3 is nuts. End of story. Even if they don't win it all straightaway, you've still got to be comatose to say no.
VF21 said:Don't get me wrong. I would trade Peja and Brad and keep Bibby, if possible. Mike does a lot better with a strong post presence. Bibby and Garnett could be bigger than Stockton and Malone. It would be a duo for the ages...
Webb and Garnett are (were) incredibly similar players. In theory Bibby would thrive with KG.KKSloga said:And exactly what strong post presence are we talking about that he has done good with?? Trade Bibby and Miller along with some spare parts and bring back Cassel in the deal and you have a championship contender.
Yoda said:Webb and Garnett are (were) incredibly similar players. In theory Bibby would thrive with KG.
You trade Peja because he is not locked up (may have to pay him the max) and he has no heart.
KKSloga said:Thats right, I forgot about Bibby's heart as he was torn apart my ridnour, Sam Cassel on a bad back, Steve Nash and Nick Van Exel. Boy I hope Pedja one day has the heart of Bibby!!![]()
KKSloga said:Thats right, I forgot about Bibby's heart as he was torn apart my ridnour, Sam Cassel on a bad back, Steve Nash and Nick Van Exel. Boy I hope Pedja one day has the heart of Bibby!!![]()
Kool Keith said:GOT HEART?
Maybe we should have kept Brent Price... he had heart. In fact, we should build an entire team of heart. "Sacramento Kings-o-Hearts". That way even if we lose, we can at least say we tried.
I mean never mind that its intangible.. today its what sets our players apart. Why should it matter how they perform? If they've got heart, they're a stayin!!!
heart (härt)
n.
1.
a) The chambered muscular organ in vertebrates that pumps blood received from the veins into the arteries, thereby maintaining the flow of blood through the entire circulatory system.
b) Postulating that the team is ones own.
Bricklayer said:c) Having a pair, and pride to go with it. Never taking the easy way out. Fighting and competing because it is who they are and they know no other way.
I suspect without knowing that people who poopoo the notion are people who do not possess it themselves. Because I find it hard to believe anybody who DOES have heart could or would ever underestimate its importance or spend time tolerating or excusing its alck.
Kool Keith said:See if I wrote that I'd get a warning... not that it matters - you may accuse me of having no pride etc but its not relevant to the topic at hand.
Im talking about the notion and its relation to sport. I wont be baited into a slanging match with a moderator.
You say Im underestimating it....... I say certain people are OVERESTIMATING it and to the point that it can excuse anything.
Bricklayer said:c) Having a pair, and pride to go with it. Never taking the easy way out. Fighting and competing because it is who they are and they know no other way.
I suspect without knowing that people who poopoo the notion are people who do not possess it themselves. Because I find it hard to believe anybody who DOES have heart could or would ever underestimate its importance or spend time tolerating or excusing its alck.
I find it really hard to believe someone (Peja) can make it to the NBA without having "heart". No one makes it to this league without heart and determination, bottom line. Everyone in the NBA is a competitor as well, some show it more than others, and some do it more than others. Unfortunately, Peja isn't in the latter, but he competes none the less.Bricklayer said:It is difficult to OVERestimate its impact, because in the end it can be the x factor that makes some people winners, and other losers. It made Jordan what he was. It made the Pistons what they are. Wanting it more and refusing to surrender are some of the very best traits any athlete can have in any sport, and make for the most inspirational sporting memories. People who fail to recognize the importance of that factor doubtless find themselves constantly mystified as to why their putatively more talented teams and heroes never seem to win anything.