The of course he was 6'9" is a rather signicant of course in that case.
Rubio. PFs emerge EVERY year. PGs with instinct and raw, unbridled talent don't often show up at the podium. I would move mountains to get Rubio, and not least of all because he is essentially the Petrie dream pick. Rubio is the future of this franchise, and if we DON'T end up with him, I'll be both suprised and highly disappointed.
Thinking of:
SG: Martin
PG: Rubio
SF: Garcia
PF: Thompson
C: Hawes
...is a great prospect, and one I would love to watch as we transition.
There is no way Petrie passes on Griffin. Ask any nba front office or any nba analyst who the most dominate player in this class is. If he did pick ruio with the first pick he would become the laughing stock of the nba. He is much too smart for that.
Everybody knows Griffin is going #1 this year, including Griffin. If we end up with the top pick and Rubio declares (and if Petrie is actually interested in Rubio, no proof yet), then there's no doubt in my mind that he will trade down for him and get an extra something out of it.
You mean the same laughing stock as he was when he picked up Peja over John Wallace?!There is no way Petrie passes on Griffin. Ask any nba front office or any nba analyst who the most dominate player in this class is. If he did pick ruio with the first pick he would become the laughing stock of the nba. He is much too smart for that.
You mean the same laughing stock as he was when he picked up Peja over John Wallace?!
Petrie isn't really known for trading on draft days though. Doesn't mean it won't happen. It could, but just seem not likely.
http://www.marca.com/2009/03/03/baloncesto/acb/1236104096.html
Not sure if anyone saw this yet. A true point guard with length that can play D. I will take him 1st and Blake Griffin second.
We already had JT as PF, so what we need so far is a talented PG, Rubio must be the choice
Not everyone is convinced the talent gap is so large between the two or that it even tips in Griffin's favor.
Nah, pretty much everyone connected to NBA basketball said there is only one logical #1 choice.
Maybe you can enlighten us on which expert said he'd pick Rubio over Griffin?
A great PG like Deron or Paul or Rose have impacted their franchises more than the teams that took bigs like Beasley or Horford. Griffin is a better Beasley and not quite a Horford.
...
Nah, pretty much everyone connected to NBA basketball said there is only one logical #1 choice.
Maybe you can enlighten us on which expert said he'd pick Rubio over Griffin?
Jerry Reynolds who works for the Kings front office I believe said every NBA team will select Blake Griffin number 1 and obviously that includes us. It is not even debateable anymore that we select Rubio with the number 1 pick because that simply just won't happen. The only way I see us getting Rubio is if we trade down to get him and that is highly unlikely or we ended up with the second pick which seems more likely. Also it is a very dumb move to draft for needs with a pick that high. For goodness sake we are 16-61 and we need all the talent we can get! Portland didn't take Jordan because they had Drexler / Kings didn't take Karl Malone because we had Otis Thorpe are just some of the examples where you pick for needs with picks that high. I'm sure glad Kings fans arn't running this team. It is so damn hard to believe so many of us wouldn't take Griffin number one.
Consensus best collegiate doesn't translate into best pro. I like Griffin, but:
(1) Power forward is the LEAST important position on the court.
(2) Point Guard is MOST important.
(3) Rubio makes teammates better. Blake Griffin makes Blake Griffin better.
I am not saying I'd take Rubio over Griffin, but it's not as clear cut as you make it out to be.
Does anyone know if and when we have Rubio or Griffin come for a workout, we can play them 1-on-1 or 2-on-2 against are existing personnel, or are there rules that disallow it????
I'd love to see Rubio go 1-on-1 against B-Jax or BENO.
And I'd love to see a 2-on-2 of Hawes, JT vs. Blake Griffin and Donte Greene.
I am sure our scouts, front office would too.
Also, regarding Jerry Reynolds comments, haven't you heard of a smoke screen?
Okay, wait...
You're claiming Jerry Reynolds as an ultimate authority? ...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...whew...
Sorry, I had to step away from the computer for just a minute.
Jerry Reynolds, who is the ultimate organization mouthpiece, could VERY EASILY be attempting a smoke screen, a case of misdirection to keep people from suspecting that Ricky Rubio is, right down to his sneakers, the ultimate type of Geoff Petrie pick in this year's draft.
Will we pick Rubio if we get the chance? Don't know. Will we actually snag Griffin as the best available if we manage to garner the first pick? Don't know that either.
But I do know that quoting Jerry Reynolds as the ultimate authority is just ...
...
...
...
...
...
...whew. Thanks. I really needed a good laugh.
![]()
You need to quit assuming that on-air personalities know more about the inner workings of the organization than anyone else. In all honesty, there are times when they are deliberately kept in the dark about some things - you know the term "plausible deniability"?
Yes, he's knowledgeable as someone who has been around the league and the Kings for a very long time but he's not privvy to all the inner workings of basketball operations - nor should he be.
I just think quoting him to support your Griffin comments is a little far-fetched.
How do you feel about garlic fries?