TheWileyVet
Starter
Again, you've got the wrong mindset. Going on a team-by-team basis, we'd have the best odds of getting the #1, and that's all we should really be hoping for at this point. Or at least the top 2
If we don't get top 2 I will puke.
Again, you've got the wrong mindset. Going on a team-by-team basis, we'd have the best odds of getting the #1, and that's all we should really be hoping for at this point. Or at least the top 2
If we don't get top 2 I will puke.
True but our chances are still greater that we DON'T end up with the number 1 pick than they are that we do end up with the #1 pick.
Really we are only 1 in 4 chance of ending up with #1 pick. Either way, those are not great odds.
46.5% chance for Griffin or Rubio with the worst record. Basically flip a coin if the Kings will have either of those guys in uniform next season. Not so bad.
*if Rubio doesn't drop out
How do you know he won't drop to 3rd? What if a team like Chicago with already a great young PG gets the 2nd pick? OKC wouldn't take Rubio, they already have Westbrook. I have doubts about Washington taking Rubio, they still have tons of faith in Gilbert Arenas. I doubt the Knicks would take him with already 2 good PGs in Duhon and Robinson. Toronto has Calderon already, Bucks already have Sessions, Nets have Devin Harris, Bobcats already have 2 young PGs in Augustin and Felton. So most of the teams would likely take someone else over Rubio at the 2nd spot and if we get the 3rd pick he could very easily drop to us and we might even be able to get him at the 4th.
In most cases teams drafting that high go for the best available player no matter what they need.
How do you know he won't drop to 3rd? What if a team like Chicago with already a great young PG gets the 2nd pick? OKC wouldn't take Rubio, they already have Westbrook. I have doubts about Washington taking Rubio, they still have tons of faith in Gilbert Arenas. I doubt the Knicks would take him with already 2 good PGs in Duhon and Robinson. Toronto has Calderon already, Bucks already have Sessions, Nets have Devin Harris, Bobcats already have 2 young PGs in Augustin and Felton. So most of the teams would likely take someone else over Rubio at the 2nd spot and if we get the 3rd pick he could very easily drop to us and we might even be able to get him at the 4th.
How do you know he won't drop to 3rd? What if a team like Chicago with already a great young PG gets the 2nd pick? OKC wouldn't take Rubio, they already have Westbrook. I have doubts about Washington taking Rubio, they still have tons of faith in Gilbert Arenas. I doubt the Knicks would take him with already 2 good PGs in Duhon and Robinson. Toronto has Calderon already, Bucks already have Sessions, Nets have Devin Harris, Bobcats already have 2 young PGs in Augustin and Felton. So most of the teams would likely take someone else over Rubio at the 2nd spot and if we get the 3rd pick he could very easily drop to us and we might even be able to get him at the 4th.
cigaM Numbers:
Oklahoma City: 1 (Cha, @Mil, @Por, @LAC)
Washington: 4 (@Tor, Tor, @Bos)
LA Clippers: 4 (Sac, Por, @Utah, OKC)
Kings Games Remaining: Hou, @LAC, SA, @Den, @Min
Games in red are tomorrow.
Kings worst possible draft pick: 7th
Kings minimum lottery combos (out of 1000): 137
Let me see if I understand this backwards Magic #. So, if Sac loses a game, then OKC is out of the running for the worst record. Wash and LAC would go to cigaM #3 meaning that any combination of Sac losses or Wash wins (and same for LAC) totalling 3 would end us in last place in the league with the best chance of getting the 1st pick.
The current draft system has only been in affect since 1994, and since then the worst team has won 2, the 2nd worst team has won 1, and the 3rd worst team has won 4 times. But because the sampling is so small history has no bearing on the actual odds. With over 1000 possible combinations, you'd need hundreds of drafts to show the correct percentages, not 15.Hasn't someone posted that in the last 20 years of the lottery, the bottom dwelling team has only gotten the #1 pick 3 times? Sure hope the Kings can break that run to get Griffin. But somehow, my innards are telling me there is a sneaky trade on draft day in GP's scheme of things. Got nuttin to back that up just a hunch. Actually would rather have Griffin as don't think any of the PG's can come in and help for a year or so.
History has no bearing on odds. You can flip a coin 1,000,000 times, but the next time you flip, the odds for heads or tails is still 50-50, even if tails came up the other 999,999 times you flipped. (Unless you haven't noticed it's a trick coin.)
The current draft system has only been in affect since 1994, and since then the worst team has won 2, the 2nd worst team has won 1, and the 3rd worst team has won 4 times. But because the sampling is so small history has no bearing on the actual odds. With over 1000 possible combinations, you'd need hundreds of drafts to show the correct percentages, not 15.
That being said: In the last 15 drafts 2 of the bottom 3 teams have be picked in the bottom 3 lottery picks 66% of the time. And, the 3rd team cant do worst than 4th. And, only once has all 3 worst teams not been picked or 7% of the time. If I were a gambling man, I'd bet that the best player in the draft as determined 4 yrs from now, won't be in the 1st 3 picks anyways.
Lol at Diogu at starting SG.
Interesting, both Washington and the Clipps are at 18 wins, so the Kings (16w) can still win one game and lose three and wrap up the worst record. Don't blow it now, Kings.
Losing to the Clipps tonight would make this a two-team race. Somehow, unfortunately, I smell a stinky 'w'ictory tonight.![]()
I'd like to beat the Clips and still have the worst record by one game. Let's shoot for that, OK?![]()