VF21 said:I'm thinking it just might be Pooh Jeter. I mean, the name itself is priceless.
Nah, I dont think so...his dad and grandfather both had the same name, Eugene. I checked the Portland Pilots media guide from last season, and it just said it was a nickname. I think it might have mentioned it if the Original Pooh was his uncle or something.Interesting is there by any chance Pooh Jeter and Pooh Richardson are related?
Is it Ron, Mr. Clutch Mike Bibby or our best big man Brad Miller? every team has there important peice which one is ours????
i gotta say it's Mike Bibby, ( Sorry Ron ) but Bibby is valuable and he provides to score points when there is a important situation.
Carolija said:Ron Artest and thats a little scary in itself.
It's a risk to consider Ron you're most important player of course hes a impact player and he is probably our best impact player on the team? but is he the most important? i don't think so.
piksi said:take him out and You have a lottery team of the knicks calibar
Londonking said:Perhaps it depends upon what we mean by 'important'.
If 'important' is taken to mean the player whose inclusion in the team has the greatest marginal influence to improve the team's chances of winning the game, then i think its difficult to pick anyone other than Ron.
But i do agree with you Joker, that Bibby is a very important member of the team.
Which is why i stated hes our best impact player. but in some sense important has a different meaning.
and people let's not even compare the Kings team without Artest with the Knicks... thats just a horror.
piksi said:Knicks might even be more talented
Talent has nothing to do with the chemistry you have the Knicks have been a dump since the 90's. all they do is overpay scrubs hoping they somehow turn into a All-star.
we're better then the Knicks with our without Ron infact just about any NBA team is better then the Knicks or better yet any YMCA team.
It's definitely not Bibby. He looked big and a step slower, probably from lifting too many weights. I think his peak years are behind him, even though he's still under 30. It's not the years, but the mileage.It's Bibby, he's been here the longest and he's the highest paid, and if the game is on the line I want the ball in his hands. Last year I was dissapointed in his energy level but I expect him to bring it this season.
You have something else to add, or are you bored with this thread?*yawn*
Without Artest we are not even a remote chance for play-offs. With Artest we are a play off contender. You only need to look at last season to realise who the heart and soul of the team is and that scares me a bit.It's a risk to consider Ron you're most important player of course hes a impact player and he is probably our best impact player on the team? but is he the most important? i don't think so.
^^ okay Piksi, we know all about the weaker aspects of Mike's game.
I would say that Ron is our most important player - you only have to reflect on how the team played with him in the side compared to the early part of the season without him. However, I dont think Mike's (positive) contribution to the team should be overlooked. - He is a player who can be relied upon to hit the clutch shot when we need it most.
With Kevin maturing and the offensive potential of Brad we have a decent starting line up. Sure I would like to see SAR play tougher, but last season it couldnt have been much fun for him with his broken jaw. Im hoping that next season he will be more agressive.