Monty'sBiggestFan
Starter
Ditto...it was either Downey, Jr. or Spacey for the part I ulitimately gave to Spacey.
I'm still fighting myself over THREE different directors, so I will fill the last really important role with the one guy who really has to play it. (Well actually, I can think of another two or three guys, but I want this one.
My Pick:
Justin Long
![]()
Need him for the cliche 'best-friend' role I guess.
I'm a mac.
Since not enough of the people on my list are being taken, I will need to do some serious decision making before the slow end of the snake gets back around to me. However, there's never been an ounce of doubt about my next pick.
![]()
Alan Rickman -- One of my very favorite actors in any genre, but especially in comedic roles. He should be heaven in a film/style known for wringing every drop of unsubtle innuendo from each line of dialog.
Natalie Martinez
Yeah, I decided to call an audible on that; I was going to have Rodriguez play the younger of two sisters, and draft an older actress to portray her older sister, but I decided at the last minute to make Rodriguez the older one.Damn nabbit.
I love his acting, he just wouldn't have a place in my movie. Kinda one of those things about this draft, the best actors available might not be good fits for your movie. Wonderful choice though![]()
Daniel Day-Lewis
I'm on pins and needles waiting to find out Spike's next pick. A muppet, perhaps?![]()
![]()
LOL
Okay, I need to know how much time I have to make a pick. I just got home from work and see that Spike was up again this morning.
The problem: I have posted what he gave me. Since we are now entering the long end of the picks (from our perspective), there will be a little time before Spike comes up again. So, I am going to try and wing it and choose someone for the movie. If it totally blows everything, I want to know if my choice can be totally thrown out meaning the Spike ends with one actor/actress short.
What say you commissioner?
Whoa..what? Why? Huh?
The grand tradition in these things is just to skip somebody if they aren't going to be around, not to take experimental nonbinding picks for them. Although that could be fun too...
If he's not around, and not going to be around, we'll just a) skip him; and b) trash his credit rating as punishment; and then he can make it up when he does get back form Patagonia.
While we're asking the commish some questions, I've got a few that came up as I was going over my list earlier today.
Have you given any more thought to extending this a few more rounds? Is the tagline + brief synopsis round in lieu of another actor? Or in addition? Are we able to specify any other actors by name in our final write-up even if they weren't drafted?
The reason I ask is that it occured to me that the biggest names I have left on my list are all for relatively inconsequential character roles. I'd be tempted to draft them first based on noteriety, but don't want to run out of time to pick people who are more important to the plot. Nor would I want to grab all my oddball picks and have the draft extended at the last minute after my big names have been taken. I can work around whatever your decision is, but it will definitely have an impact on my strategy from here on and would, therefore, like to figure out what the total number of actors is going to be.
Obviously, I'll vote in the poll..but since we're chatting amongst ourselves too...I'm running into similar dilemmas trying to fit what parts I need or would like to cast with what spaces I have available. I'd like to not have to use the rounds for summaries and taglines et al. for those purposes. Let's add two "rounds" to absorb those ancilary pieces and have people reveal them like we did the genre. Then we have two rounds that can be used as wildcards without having to spend time deciding how many rounds to add which may or may not benefit some people more than others.