Next Kings coach : list

Messina is the highest paid coach in Europe. He'd demand top salary to come to the US. Maybe, in the $5-6M range. That's more than the Kings paid Petrie & Theus combined. And, you still have to pay Westphal.

Doen't expect the Kings to spend more than $4M.

The truth is you have to pay Messina around $8M to match his salary in Russia (do not forget about Russian tax heaven; plus, CSKA pays his taxes anyway).

However, I do agree with Doc, Messina will take less if he really wants to coach in NBA. He is a rich man and if he wants more money, he will stay in Russia. However, I think that there is a huge chance that he leaves CSKA Moscow anyway. CSKA is a great franchise (also know as Red Army in North America, remember their hockey team? :), NBA-like organization (according to Givony) .... But he's won everything with that team and he needs a new challenge and you cannot find a better one than NBA. So, I would not worry that much about his potential NBA salary.
 
I like Messina, and most of seasons he would be at the top of my list. Everything I have heard about him leads me to believe he would be successful in the nba if given a good opportunity.

But this offseason we have better coaches to chose from who are proven nba head coaches. I would like us to sign a coach which involves a minimal amount of risk-meaning we know they have been successful in the nba. I think G Karl is staying put, but B Scott and the Hornets might look to go their seperate ways. Scott would be my #1 choice. Van Gundy, A Johnson, E Jordan, and P Westphal would all get the nod over Messina if it was my decision. We can't afford another mistake, and although I thin Messina will be successful in this league at some point I want a proven nba head coach.

I agree about Messina. He probably would (and probably will) be at least a good NBA coach and probably better, but we need an experienced NBA head coach for this group.

I still don't like any of the choices out there and I suspect that most of those listed above (Van Gundy, A Johnson, E Jordan, Westphal) would end up losing games and lose the team within the next 2 years and we would need to fire them as well and we would be doing this same search over again like we have every year since we fired Adelman.
 
If they lose by almost 60 again in game 5, he might not be back.

Agreed. Of course then we have to ask ourselves whether we want to hire the coach who lost two playoff games by almost 60 points as our head coach. Sometimes coaches get fired for the right reason.
 
There is one name I am kind of shocked hasn't been mentioned yet, considering the history of our owners and other criterion he clearly hits, and that is Rudy Tomjanovich. Considering his exit, he might want one last go-round in a lower stress environment (Sac vs. LA) to hang his hat on. Just a hunch.
 
Agreed. Of course then we have to ask ourselves whether we want to hire the coach who lost two playoff games by almost 60 points as our head coach. Sometimes coaches get fired for the right reason.

Scott is among the short list of coaches who are absolutely the worst picks for a young, rebuilding team.

Why?

Because of his hard nosed, "my way or no way" style that leads to discarding quality talent because they are on his sh!t list.

Brandon Bass was a hard working PF who was yanked early in games because Scott had a short leash (sound familiar with JT and Hawes?). He couldn't get solid minutes in the rotation, and because of that, they let him go. Now, he's a quality reserve F/C for Dallas that would have been great for the hornets bench.

Birdman was allowed to return to the hornets when the team easily could have waived their rights after returning from suspension. But they kept him to see what he could do. Again, Scott didn't play him consistent minutes. The team wasn't going to spend more money on a reserve who Scott wouldn't play, so they let him go. Now, he's a sparkplug player who is second in the league in shot blocking behind Dwight Howard. Another talent that could have been key for the hornets who lack frontline depth, rebounding, and shot blocking.

Julian Wright is very similar to a young Gerald Wallace. He's an athletic F/G who plays hard on both ends of the floor, and makes hustle plays. He makes mistakes that young guys make, but because of that, Scott has no patience and Wright can't break the rotation on a team that is bone dry on the bench.

Many people point to the lack of talent and depth on the hornets as a major reason why they aren't serious contenders. Well, Scott's coaching has had a major impact in that area. He doesn't develop young talent that well. He doesn't have much patience for young players unless they are one of his favorites. He often has conflicts with players that result in talent leaving the team. He was ran out of town in NJ, and it looks as if he's already worn out his welcome in NOLA. Sound familiar? It reminds me of Nelly and Avery.

And that's not even mentioning his lack of gameplans and in-game adjustments.

For a young team, I don't think the right choice is a guy with a history of player conflicts, lack of youth development, and running off talent that he doesn't like. This team needs a "players coach" who can develop these young players, has patience knowing these guys will make mistakes, and puts them on the court instead of yanking them at the first sign of mistakes.
 
Last edited:
Oh that's jsut too much. Byron Scott has been to the NBA Finals (twice I think), the Western Conference Finals, he brought along Chris Paul, David West and Tyson Chandler. He may not be perfect, but all of these loud objections to coaches that have been to the top, and in this case to a coach who has doen exactly what we need done -- taken the worst team in the league when he took them over and made them into a power (really not once, but twice -- did it in New Jersey too) -- just too much. There are no perfect candidates. I distrust excessive hardnosedness. But I very much trust results. And Scott has gotten them. He would show up in town with as much or more legitmacy than any other available candidate. And given his status as a former assistant under Adelman, I would not be surprised if he's on Geoff's list.
 
I like Byron Scott. He would, as Brickie has pointed out, come to town with legitimacy and credibility both with fans and with players. I'd be more than willing to accept him as the next head coach of the Sacramento Kings.

In fact, if it's going to be someone with previous NBA head coaching experience, I'd be very tempted to put Scott at the top of my short list.
 
Oh that's jsut too much. Byron Scott has been to the NBA Finals (twice I think), the Western Conference Finals, he brought along Chris Paul, David West and Tyson Chandler. He may not be perfect, but all of these loud objections to coaches that have been to the top, and in this case to a coach who has doen exactly what we need done -- taken the worst team in the league when he took them over and made them into a power (really not once, but twice -- did it in New Jersey too) -- just too much. There are no perfect candidates. I distrust excessive hardnosedness. But I very much trust results. And Scott has gotten them. He would show up in town with as much or more legitmacy than any other available candidate. And given his status as a former assistant under Adelman, I would not be surprised if he's on Geoff's list.

The only reason why that team turned around is because they drafted a top 5 talent in the game. Paul took a horrible team on his back in his second season, and with a ton of injuries, almost got them to .500 ball.

In his third season, he carried them to 56 wins and a game behind the Lakers with an average squad.

I'm not going to breakdown the entire team, but I will put it like this: Scott has had the best point guard for two of his teams. Beno has showed Kings fans the importance of play from that position. Right now, he has a top 5 player in the game, and a PF who was solid enough to make the all star team. Who do the Kings have? NOBODY. There's no way he takes the Kings anywhere, unless Sac drafts one of the best players in the league, period.

And my points about his style in relation to the situation the Kings are in stand. He's not the kind of coach that will develop the youth and build this team. He likes vets, doesn't like players who make mistakes (unless he favors them), and he drives players away. THIS ISN'T THE STYLE OF COACH FOR A TEAM THAT IS LOOKING TO REBUILD WITH YOUTH. This is the case, unless the Kings draft a top 5 player in the league, which isn't going to happen. Ask yourself this: would you want Nelly to coach this team next season?

And this is coming from a hornet fan who has been through the good and bad. Scott isn't to blame for everything that's going wrong, but he does share a hefty responsibility for his decisions, and IMO he gets a lot of credit for what his point guards have done for their respective teams.
 
Last edited:
There's no way he takes the Kings anywhere, unless Sac drafts one of the best players in the league, period.

No way he takes the Kings anywhere? We're not talking a trip to the finals in June. At this point, actually returning to the days of the occasional win at home AND consistent effort would be enough of a first step for me.
 
No way he takes the Kings anywhere? We're not talking a trip to the finals in June. At this point, actually returning to the days of the occasional win at home AND consistent effort would be enough of a first step for me.

Listen, I'm not saying he's not a good coach. I'm saying he's not the right type of coach for this situation. I can't tell you how frustrating it's been watching Scott run off quality talent that would have made the hornets serious contenders in the playoffs. I couldn't stand seeing him do that to the Kings.

And it's not like I'm happy where the team is at, but there's a difference in a fan who just wants to be better, and a fan who wants the team to take the right steps to develop a contending team. I don't want to just get back to .500 ball. I don't just want the team to play average basketball. That's why a coach like Nelly isn't right for this team, even though he's a "proven" coach.

JFC, the guy just tied a record for worst playoff loss (at home, mind you) with a 58 point debacle, thanks in large part to staying with a 7 or 8 man rotation for the first 3 quarters and making zero adjustments.

This team just had a coach with rotations and adjustments that were ripped apart. How much more anger would come with a coach who has NO adjustments or gameplan?
 
Last edited:
And that's where I disagree. I don't think he would run off quality talent. I actually think he might be just what the doctor ordered to put some structure into the games of Thompson and Hawes and whomever we get in this draft.
 
And that's where I disagree. I don't think he would run off quality talent. I actually think he might be just what the doctor ordered to put some structure into the games of Thompson and Hawes and whomever we get in this draft.

That's the thing:

If a player isn't up to snuff, he doesn't develop them or teach them unless he really really likes him. He gets pissed that they aren't as good as he wants them to be, and either doesn't play them, or yanks them early. This "structure" is why Bass is gone and Wright is following right behind him. Regardless of how much talent a player has, or how much they produce on the court, if Scott isn't happy with you, you DON'T PLAY. This happens even when the players who do get time over them are worse and make mistakes too.

Remember when Miller was playing 35+ minutes a game over Hawes and JT? Remember when Donte wasn't getting any time? Go back and look at what the fans had to say, then come back to me and tell me that's what this team needs.
 
Last edited:
Since we've shipped out Miller, Salmons and Moore, the only way Scott could stifle growth is by playing Beno over whatever PG we draft, and by burying Greene under Noce/Garcia. The former may be the right move considering how raw the PG prospect is, and the latter was certainly the right move from what I've seen/heard of this season.
 
Since we've shipped out Miller, Salmons and Moore, the only way Scott could stifle growth is by playing Beno over whatever PG we draft, and by burying Greene under Noce/Garcia. The former may be the right move considering how raw the PG prospect is, and the latter was certainly the right move from what I've seen/heard of this season.

This is the coach who liked Hilton Armstrong over Birdman and Bass. Hilton who is less skilled and effective than Kwame Brown. You ask how this could be worse. Imagine KT playing over JT. It wouldn't surprise me.

One more thing: I don't know if this approach is a result of his ego/hard nosed style, or if this is the mentality he takes with teams on the edge of contention where he wants guys to already be ready. If it's the latter, and changes his approach coming into this situation, then I wouldn't have a problem. If it's the former, then I don't want him, just like I don't want Nelly or Avery.

After the worst playoff performance in NBA history, New Orleans Hornets coach Byron Scott had no choice but to march out of that numb locker room and confess: I did a lousy job, too. That’s all.

As much as his players deserved scolding for such a startling submission on Monday night, they needed to hear Scott take his burden of blame for an unfathomable 58-point loss to the Denver Nuggets.

Only, Scott didn’t do it. He’s a proud, assured man, but no one should’ve deserved to escape responsibility for this stunning 121-63 loss in Game 4 of the Western Conference playoffs. To no one’s surprise, Scott suggested that the Hornets didn’t compete at the New Orleans Arena. In the history of the NBA, no truth had ever been so resounding. Yet, it was odd to hear him punctuate that thought with, “I don’t know what you can do to change that.”

It wouldn’t be Scott’s worst idea to come up with something between now and an embarrassing season’s end in Game 5 on Wednesday night. Multiple agents and rival league executives say that Scott’s job could be in peril.

General manager Jeff Bower has been supportive, but the fact that he would extend Scott through only the 2009-2010 season suggests that he wasn’t completely sold on a coach whom he inherited.

Scott is respected and beloved, and everyone wants him to succeed. He’s a prince of a man and has shown an ability to get teams through tough times and the grind of rebuilding. Yet there have long been questions about preparation and attention to detail. Those issues lost him favor with his veteran stars in New Jersey and cost him his job after taking the Nets to back-to-back NBA Finals appearances. He was the NBA’s Coach of the Year a season ago, and yet it changes nothing for Scott.

This series shouldn’t cost him his job, but it probably complicates matters now. A contract extension appears unlikely. At best, Scott will enter the final year of his deal for the second time in three years. And who knows – maybe that’s something he doesn’t want to do again. Sources close to him say he was agitated with a modest commitment after one of the best seasons in Hornets history.

In the coach’s defense, the Hornets are hurting. Tyson Chandler shouldn’t be on the floor. Chris Paul and David West have knee and back injuries. The list goes on and on. Truth be told, they’ve been blown out of three of the four games in this series. In Game 4 on Monday, New Orleans quit. They just stopped playing.

This is a moment of truth for the Hornets. They climb on a flight to Denver for a Game 5 on Wednesday, where almost assuredly this season will come to a humbling end. They’re no longer the feel-good story of the sport, but one more franchise losing traction in the Western Conference arms race.

The Hornets signed Paul to a four-year contract extension in the summer, but they still have much to prove to him. He’s always the dutiful public face, but he was beyond seething on Monday night. He sounded like he was delivering notice to his coach and management. “Every time we tried something, they countered it,” Paul said. As for the gulf in talent, he simply said, “Look at their team – a lot of great players.”

The best point guard on the planet should’ve had a stronger supporting cast for these playoffs. He can blame his owner, George Shinn, whom two league agents say pulled the Hornets’ free-agent offer to keep Jannero Pargo in a late hour of negotiations. For some reason, he decided that the offer sat long enough on the table. This pushed Pargo overseas for the season, a back-up who last year had 27 points against the San Antonio Spurs in Game 7 of the conference semifinals. There was no one of his ilk left on the market.

Scott has lamented his bench, and been reluctant to play recent late lottery picks, Julian Wright and Hilton Armstrong. Most league executives still expect that they’ll be solid, if not better, players in the league. They haven’t developed with the Hornets, and multiple teams have tried to pry them out of New Orleans. J.R. Smithhas turned into one of the most explosive bench scorers in the sport, but the Hornets parted with him because Scott – often rightfully – couldn’t stand him.

For the Hornets, they are a cash-strapped small-market team with an owner forever angling for the next city to court him, for the next financial score. Who knows their future in New Orleans? For now, they have to slash payroll over the summer, and that’ll start with center Tyson Chandler again.

When everyone dismissed the Chandler deadline trade to Oklahoma City as a pure contract dump, Bower politely disagreed. He watched Joe Smith and Chris Wilcox rebound and defend – something that Chandler no longer did with ferocity. With the way that Chandler has hobbled on that ankle, his trade value has never been lower.

Something is going to change here, something significant. New Orleans lost by 58 points on Monday, the league’s worst playoff loss in 53 years, and this happened to be one of those nights when everyone expects broad and sweeping change for the Hornets. Maybe it’ll be the coach, maybe not.

Nevertheless, Byron Scott could’ve done himself a favor and publicly wondered about his own part in this embarrassing episode. It wouldn’t have taken much, and probably would’ve gone a long way with management and players. As much as they need to hear it, he needed to say it.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_y...g=aw-hornetsblowout042809&prov=yhoo&type=lgns

And the meltdown you see now that the media is so shocked and surprised over are issues I was pointing out all last season on other boards about the roster and his coaching. I knew this would happen, and I predicted the Nuggets in 6 before this series started..
 
Last edited:
You are being considerably inconsistent -- when he liked Armstrong over Bridman and Bass, Armstrong was precisely what you say he won't play -- a young lottery pick in need of PT. Birdman meanwhile was a druggie about to exit the league. Bass was a mistake, but that happens sometimes. Rick had it with Gerald. Pat Riley had his J.R. Smith with Ricky Davis (Smith BTW deserved every bit of despite that Scott gave him, and without it they would never have landed Chandler).
 
I would have nooooo problem at all if Byron Scott was the nextt kings coach. He would be my #1 choice if/when he becomes available. He has developed young talent, put good defensive team on the floor, and had success in the playoffs with the first two teams he has coached.

A hard-nosed coach who demands his team plays hard is exactly what this team needs. He has the resume and experience to have the respect of our players the minute he walks through the door. We need a coach our players will respond to and play hard for. Nobody would quit on B Scott like they have with our last 3 coaches. In my opinion, B Scott would be the ideal candidate and might be the only coach(if available) that I would overpay for.
 
Nobody would quit on B Scott like they have with our last 3 coaches.

While I consider Scott one of the stronger candidates, I believe the main argument against him is precisely the perception that his current team has quit on him (JKidd (noted coach killer BTW) also ran him out of NJ).

(And actually hardnosed coaches are at least as prone to that phenomenon as non-hardnosed guys. Basically their players eventually say "yeah, well **** you".)
 
While I consider Scott one of the stronger candidates, I believe the main argument against him is precisely the perception that his current team has quit on him (JKidd (noted coach killer BTW) also ran him out of NJ).

(And actually hardnosed coaches are at least as prone to that phenomenon as non-hardnosed guys. Basically their players eventually say "yeah, well **** you".)
Be that as it may, I still say if Scott becomes available, don't bother interviewing other candidates, do what Wizards did with Flip and just go straight out and offer Scott the deal he can't refuse.

If he is out of NO (I honestly can't see that happening) he instantly becomes the best candidate on the market and by a reasonable margin.

As you said, he has rebuild 2 teams, gone to NBA finals twice with NJ. Thats a pretty good records. He also is a hard *** coach which is what this team needs at this point. There is just too much "aloofness" with this team. Not enough discipline and Scott is someone that can right the ship.

Having said all that, its precisely the reason why the Hornets won't let him go.
 
You are being considerably inconsistent -- when he liked Armstrong over Bridman and Bass, Armstrong was precisely what you say he won't play -- a young lottery pick in need of PT.

No, I said that if Scott doesn't like the guy or how he plays, then they don't play. He plays favorites and if he likes a guy, he will play him no matter what.

I used the example of Wright and Bass. He had a short leash with Bass, and yanked him when he made mistakes (low patience). And yet, he liked Hilton at the time despite Hilton being less of a player (plays favorites). Basically, if he doesn't like a guy, he has no patience and doesn't want to help develop them. If he likes a guy, he will keep him around no matter how bad they play.

Birdman meanwhile was a druggie about to exit the league.

False. He was suspended, then allowed to return after treatment. If they didn't want him, then they could have waived his rights when he came back. NOLA could have just not dealt with him at all, and allowed another team to pick him up. BUT, they let him return because they needed another big, and they wanted to see what he could do. Problem was, Scott wouldn't play him. In order to return to the league, he had to complete treatment. He did that, and when he came back, he kept his nose clean and everything was OK. So his drug thing was NOT the issue with why they didn't keep him. They didn't keep him because the cash strapped team wasn't going to pay another big that wasn't getting time on the court when they already had guys like Ely and Bowen under contract. If Birdman got more time on the court, I think the situation wouldn't be the same.

Bass was a mistake, but that happens sometimes. Rick had it with Gerald.

Rick didn't let Gerald leave. That situation was different. He was left unprotected in the expansion draft to keep Peeler (mistake), but it's not that Rick felt Gerald wasn't going to be able to contribute and wouldn't play him.

Your point is that talent is passed up all the time, which is true. But the difference here is that the coach's conflicts and style are driving away talent. This isn't a GM mistake, it's a Nelly type situation.
 
One of the arguments against Scott has been he doesn't develop the young guys (unless you're a superstar).

Julian Wright, drafted 13th in 2007 - 9.3 mpg this year
Hilton Armstrong, drafted 12th in 2006 - 11.3 mpg this year

If I had Julian Wright sitting on my bench in favor of a dilapidated Peja, I'd be unhappy as a fan. Wasted talent.
 
Hornets lose by an average of over 30PPG in this series, including tying a league record of the biggest playoff loss of 58 points that happened in 1956. Kings need that coach, especially considering the Kings fantastic ability to defend the 3.
 
I'm sure there was some pressure from the GM to win games as well. Would you rather have the young athletic slasher on the rookie scale contract sit on the bench, or a once-touted MVP candidate and former all star getting paid almost $13 million to keep seats warm? Also, Armstrong is averaging 15.4 mins per game this year. Not much of a jump, but it isn't garbage time minutes either.

Also, Wright averaged 14.2 mins per game this year.
 
I'm sure there was some pressure from the GM to win games as well. Would you rather have the young athletic slasher on the rookie scale contract sit on the bench, or a once-touted MVP candidate and former all star getting paid almost $13 million to keep seats warm? Also, Armstrong is averaging 15.4 mins per game this year. Not much of a jump, but it isn't garbage time minutes either.

Also, Wright averaged 14.2 mins per game this year.

14.2 minutes per game. Thats around 3.5 minutes a quarter. There was a time when I could almost hold my breath that long. I think I'm going to side with Showtime on this one. Only because, number one, I don't have a clue how good a coach Scott would be here in the Kingdom, and number two, because Showtime is emotionally invested in the Hornets. He's watched them play, and Scott coach a hell of a lot more than I have, and he's made good points.

For the most part, I try and stay out of these coaching debates, because there are too many variables. A coach can have a bad coaching record, but he may have never had the opportunity to coach a really good team. Take Eddie Jordan when he was here. Go back and look up the talent he had to work with. The Kings team that just won 16 games might be more talented than that team. Trust me, I'm not trying to endorse Eddie Jordan. I'm just saying that sometimes there's more to the picture than just the win loss record.

Everyone raves about Rick Adleman when he was here, and rightly so. He did a great job. He also did a great job in Portland. He just couldn't quite get over the hump. But everyone overlooks that little short stint he had with the Warriors in between. Hey, what happened there? Lack of talent is what happened, and in fairness, he did improve the team a little. His hair probably grayed up a little too.

So we can all probably agree that Rick is a good coach. But if he would have had the misfortune to coach teams like that Warrior team, his won/loss record wouldn't look as good, and we wouldn't be thinking so highly of him. So if your going to judge a coach, or even a player, try to look a little deeper than the stat sheet. Because if thats all you do, its like reading the last page of a mystery novel. You know the outcome, but you don't know the story.
 
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/dailydime?page=dime-090430

quote:

"Questions about Scott's job security, though, are bound to surface this offseason given the manner of Monday's defeat, which one rival team executive described as the "type of loss that gets everything from management to coaches to players questioned."

However ...

The initial indications, from a few sources plugged into NBA coaching circles, suggest that Scott is not in any immediate danger of losing his job. He's scheduled to make $5-plus million next season in the final year on his Hornets coaching contract, which would appear to be too much for the cash-strapped Hornets to swallow by firing him and too much for Scott to walk away from.

Sources say Sacramento would indeed be quick to call Scott in for an interview if he was on the open coaching market, given his ties to the franchise after a two-year stint as a Kings assistant to launch his coaching career and Scott's 105 wins over the past two seasons.

But Scott is popular in New Orleans and has forged what is generally described as a good relationship with Chris Paul. With the Hornets widely assumed to be pursuing big changes to their roster if they can swing them, there's a case to be made for keeping the coach and point guard in place as a two-man base for starting over."
 
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/dailydime?page=dime-090430

quote:

"Questions about Scott's job security, though, are bound to surface this offseason given the manner of Monday's defeat, which one rival team executive described as the "type of loss that gets everything from management to coaches to players questioned."

However ...

The initial indications, from a few sources plugged into NBA coaching circles, suggest that Scott is not in any immediate danger of losing his job. He's scheduled to make $5-plus million next season in the final year on his Hornets coaching contract, which would appear to be too much for the cash-strapped Hornets to swallow by firing him and too much for Scott to walk away from.

Sources say Sacramento would indeed be quick to call Scott in for an interview if he was on the open coaching market, given his ties to the franchise after a two-year stint as a Kings assistant to launch his coaching career and Scott's 105 wins over the past two seasons.

But Scott is popular in New Orleans and has forged what is generally described as a good relationship with Chris Paul. With the Hornets widely assumed to be pursuing big changes to their roster if they can swing them, there's a case to be made for keeping the coach and point guard in place as a two-man base for starting over."
The money situation was why I didn't think he would be available. The team can't afford to pay off Scott and hire a solid coach next season, plus any roster re-tooling. Shinn doesn't have a "main" business that creates income like so many other owners. The hornets are his business. I suspect they will let him coach his last year and not offer him an extension. They probably saw this coming too, since they didn't offer him an extension this year.
 
I'm sure there was some pressure from the GM to win games as well. Would you rather have the young athletic slasher on the rookie scale contract sit on the bench, or a once-touted MVP candidate and former all star getting paid almost $13 million to keep seats warm? Also, Armstrong is averaging 15.4 mins per game this year. Not much of a jump, but it isn't garbage time minutes either.

Also, Wright averaged 14.2 mins per game this year.

Hmm. I got my stats from the NBA website. In any case, the stats (yours or mine) do ask the question about how much time these guys have spent on the court to "develop". I could care less about has-beens. Scott is probably playing Peja because he was instrumental in the trade to get him. That's a bad, bad move. If Scott is going to keep younger guys on the bench (to undevelop) in favor of has-beens, then I don't want him. If we had a similar situation here in Sacto I (and a lot of others) would be saying the same thing. I just hope that because Scott hasn't developed Wright they will think about trading him to the Kings for a bag of chips.
 
I think the difference in comparison to Sacramento with the Hornets situation is that while we here were a middling team, they were competing for a finals visit. Our so called has-beens weren't even taken us to .500, while the Hornets became a perrenial playoff team. There has been really "little" time for Wright and Armstrong's development though, seeing all the DNP's each got (I got my stats from Yahoo and compared it with ESPN). But the situation differs due to potency of has beens on their team in comparison with ours. Our has-beens were still our star players, while theirs know they are deferring to Paul.
 
I think the difference in comparison to Sacramento with the Hornets situation is that while we here were a middling team, they were competing for a finals visit. Our so called has-beens weren't even taken us to .500, while the Hornets became a perrenial playoff team. There has been really "little" time for Wright and Armstrong's development though, seeing all the DNP's each got (I got my stats from Yahoo and compared it with ESPN). But the situation differs due to potency of has beens on their team in comparison with ours. Our has-beens were still our star players, while theirs know they are deferring to Paul.
The difference is that the hornets needed bench contributers. It doesn't make any sense to sit talent when you have the thinnest bench in the game.

Also, the Kings situation didn't stop Theus or Natt from playing Miller 35+ minutes a game over the youth.
 
If you are interested, Messina and his team won Euroleague semifinal against Barcelona.
Great defense by CSKA in the fourth quarter. MVP Ramunas Siskauskas.
 
Back
Top