Yes, Swift is an expiring...all he has left is $6.2 this year then done.Yeah I'd take it if Stro is an expiring.
Um...read the past 3 pages in this thread. lolAny more rumors flying out there?
Yes, Swift is an expiring...all he has left is $6.2 this year then done.
I personally don’t like what teams are offering us for John. An expiring piece isn’t enough. Why are we just trying to dump players? Shouldn’t we also try to get someone that is young and can play? I’d like to get someone out of these trades.
Yeah, and I'd do it just to get the LATTER of the two things.Thats cool it would save us about 2mil in a buyout or having to have Mikki on the team again next year.
I agree that Thompson and our first would be too much, particularly given what other teams are offering. Thompson is better than any other young player that's rumored to be included in this deal. Throw in Houston's 1st to compensate for Mikki Moore not being as good as Drew Gooden and other veteran filler, but I really don't see any reason it should take both Jason Thompson AND our 1st to get the deal done.
And if Amare results in 5 more wins and we get, say, the #6 pick instead of the #1, so be it. I'd much rather come away from this season with Teague/Amare than Griffin/Thompson.
And I really think Amare would re-sign. Money talks 99% of the time, and there's a reason so few free agents leave.
Yeah, I'd do it...but PHX is probably looking to get younger at the point too, since Nash isnt getting any younger...and they probably are looking to draft PG with whatever draft pick they get this year, be it sticking with just their own, or getting one in return for Amare.Agree 100%
Ive been saying this since the Amare Rumors started.
You dont trade the #1 AND Thompson .. But you trade Thompson and Hawes if you need to.
Think about it, you trade Thompson , or Hawes and Thompson and you come into next year with Griffin and Stoudemire or Thabeet and Stoudemire. That is a very good 4-5 ..
As far as Amare's numbers being better because of who he plays with, You could make the same arguement that his numbers are worse because shaq demands the ball so much and clogs up the paint.
Um...Miller/KT and a late first?
Again, we are busily underselling a 4 time all star/All NBA player here. A 26yr old 5x All Star at that.
I agree that Thompson and our first would be too much, particularly given what other teams are offering. Thompson is better than any other young player that's rumored to be included in this deal. Throw in Houston's 1st to compensate for Mikki Moore not being as good as Drew Gooden and other veteran filler, but I really don't see any reason it should take both Jason Thompson AND our 1st to get the deal done.
And if Amare results in 5 more wins and we get, say, the #6 pick instead of the #1, so be it. I'd much rather come away from this season with Teague/Amare than Griffin/Thompson.
And I really think Amare would re-sign. Money talks 99% of the time, and there's a reason so few free agents leave.
2010 is a different offseason than most because so many teams are going to have enough space for max contracts.
We will have someone like Stoudamire if we want...in 2010!!! All this trade does is ruin our chances at a top 5 pick this year and next year, and at the same time lose a promising Jason Thompson. If we wait til 2010 we can have Amare and a top 5 pick AND a top 10 pick AND Thompson......doesn't that sound more appealing?
How? Everyone in the NBA is gearing up for free agents in 2010. Why would any prime time player choose Sacramento over any other team?
If we trade for Amare, we'd have the ability to sign him a six year deal, as opposed to everyone else only offering five. And it wouldn't matter whether we had cap room or not, as we'd have his rights. And if you don't want to sign him, then you get his contract off the books in 2010 anyways.
You can't assume that just because the team has cap space they're going to land a big time player. Most of the time, free agents stay with their teams. The surest way to land a superstar is to trade for him. If you honestly think our team is better with JT than it would be with Amare, we can have that discussion, but declaring JT untouchable because we're going to sign someone like Amare in a couple of years is short sighted.
Don't we need to have a player on our team for like 3 years before being able to have their bird rights? Or am I way off?![]()
From what I understand, the player has to be under contract with the same team for three years for that team to have their Bird rights. But if that player is traded, his Bird rights are traded also. So we had Bibby's Bird rights. We had Webber's Bird rights, even though we hadn't had him for three full seasons yet.
Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
But he wouldn't get as much money going to another team. The team with the Bird Rights has the advantage.
2010 is a different offseason than most because so many teams are going to have enough space for max contracts.
By the way, I'm not sure 2010 is going to be the spend-a-palooza everyone thinks it will be. The current CBA expires in 2011, and I think a lot of people are going to be hesitant to hand out five and six year maximum contracts the year before the CBA expires. LeBron will get his money. DWade will get his. Chris Bosh might. If Boozer doesn't opt out after this season (he might not, considering the year he's having and the economy), he'd be on the bubble.
From what I understand, the player has to be under contract with the same team for three years for that team to have their Bird rights. But if that player is traded, his Bird rights are traded also. So we had Bibby's Bird rights. We had Webber's Bird rights, even though we hadn't had him for three full seasons yet.
Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
Its amazing isn't it?!
Um...Miller/KT and a late first?
Again, we are busily underselling a 4 time all star/All NBA player here. A 26yr old 5x All Star at that.
Can you also give me the lotto numbers for this saturday?!Amare to Sac would only be for:
1. temporary resting spot to see what he can get on the open market this summer
2. way too much from Sac side.
In any case Amare would not stay in Sac so it becomes a give-away. JT stays no matter what.
Focus would be as many others are saying: Miller in one package and Salmons in another. Williams, KT, Douby and even Brown as filler IF a decent PG is coming back to Kings. Williams has shown a better game the past 2 weeks than any time since the Bibby trade. Would be no surprise if Kings hang on to him. But then again, no surprise if he goes either.
Reality now rears its ugly head for the next 3 days. My bet is all in the basket for salary relief this summer and not giving up either of the 2 first rounders the Kings have. The Kings IMHO will push for draft choices back in any deal. Miller becomes a plus for half-court type offenses and Salmons a plus for a team needing immediate help at the 2-3 positions.
Seems simple to me. If you can get Amare for a combination of JT, the Houston pick, and a combination of our expiring/veteran players you do it.
Amare is having a down year and still putting up 22 and 9. Kids a star and people forget that he average around 30ppg in the series against the Spurs a few years ago. Kid put up 30 a game on Duncan and people are complaining about losing JT?
We need a superstar and Amare is as close as we are going to get to that outside of a great draft. I don't want to be the Bulls of last 5 years. A team that drafted all sorts of good players but never made a move to pick up a go to guy.
There are some risks, like if Amare walks in 2010, but you have to take risks when you are the worse team in league. Make the trade, draft a pg, and hope that Amare is like most players and is willing to take the cash that only the Kings will be able to offer in 2010.