Padrino
All-Star
BMiller52 said:
don't be so shortsighted.

kings fans are rabid after several playoff appearances in a row. but i'm telling you, they'd be better off missing the playoffs and going for broke the next few seasons.
BMiller52 said:
MiniMe said:I know KG must be dying to play in Sacramentoso
Sacramento Trade Breakdown
Outgoing
Brad Miller
7-0 C from Purdue
15.1 ppg, 7.8 rpg, 4.9 apg in 36.9 minutes
Bonzi Wells
6-5 SG from Ball State
14.6 ppg, 7.9 rpg, 3.1 apg in 34.4 minutes
Shareef Abdur-Rahim
6-9 PF from California
13.4 ppg, 5.5 rpg, 2.6 apg in 29.9 minutes
Francisco Garcia
6-7 SF from Louisville
6.3 ppg, 3.0 rpg, 1.6 apg in 21.6 minutes
Incoming
Kevin Garnett
6-11 PF from Farragut Academy (HS)
21.6 ppg, 12.0 rpg, 4.3 apg in 39.3 minutes
Trenton Hassell
6-5 SG from Austin Peay
9.5 ppg, 2.8 rpg, 2.5 apg in 33.8 minutes
Change in team outlook: -18.3 ppg, -9.4 rpg, and -5.4 apg.
Minnesota Trade Breakdown
Outgoing
Kevin Garnett
6-11 PF from Farragut Academy (HS)
21.6 ppg, 12.0 rpg, 4.3 apg in 39.3 minutes
Trenton Hassell
6-5 SG from Austin Peay
9.5 ppg, 2.8 rpg, 2.5 apg in 33.8 minutes
Incoming
Brad Miller
7-0 C from Purdue
15.1 ppg, 7.8 rpg, 4.9 apg in 36.9 minutes
Bonzi Wells
6-5 SG from Ball State
14.6 ppg, 7.9 rpg, 3.1 apg in 34.4 minutes
Shareef Abdur-Rahim
6-9 PF from California
13.4 ppg, 5.5 rpg, 2.6 apg in 29.9 minutes
Francisco Garcia
6-7 SF from Louisville
6.3 ppg, 3.0 rpg, 1.6 apg in 21.6 minutes
Change in team outlook: +18.3 ppg, +9.4 rpg, and +5.4 apg.
Successful Scenario
Due to Sacramento and Minnesota being over the cap, the 25% trade rule is invoked. Sacramento and Minnesota had to be no more than 125% plus $100,000 of the salary given out for the trade to be accepted, which did happen here. This trade satisfies the provisions of the Collective Bargaining Agreement.
On top of that we can throw in a first round draft pick...
KG would be in a familiar environment similar to when he was playing with Cassell. Except this time its Bibby to KG and KG to bibby.KG plays better when he has a PG on his team that can shoot and Bibby can do just that. i don\'t remember Minni having much problem with Ervin Johnson at their center position so i suppose we can just sign a decent C during the offseason.
New Lineup would be:
C: Potapenko/Sampson or free agent we sign over offseason
PF: KG/KT/Sampson
SF: Artest/Martin/Monia
SG: Martin/Hassell
PG: Bibby/Hart
Few changes must be made in the offseason including a backup PG. Hassell can switch over to SG and SF. A center or two is also important and must be done via trade or free agency.
playmaker0017 said:Even though I'm a huge Reef fan - I think the person to move would be Miller.
Why?
It's easier to find a defensive center that can match his opponents output and play solid team defense than it is to find a PF capable of doing that.
Just my take.
I'd rather two guys in the paint that at least TRY to play defense than one guy trying to make up for the other.
Both Thomas and Reef at least give effort defensively. Thomas is just too small to make an impact - but he tries. Miller is a matador and a pushover defensively ...
He may bring the ability to stand in the high post and pass or hit a completely uncovered shot ... but I just don't think that skill set outweighs his lack of anything defensively.
In my mind, if you make a move for a purely defensive PF that rebounds ... the team has negative post impact. Teams just can't sustain themselves without the easy buckets from the post.
The PFs that dominate offensively/defensively aren't attainable.
nbrans said:Miller obviously works well with Bibby with that two-man game. If you move Miller you lose some of Bibby's production and teams will be even more inclined to stack the middle with their defense and dare the Kings to shoot from outside.
But Miller's ability to draw the opposing team's center out of the post is crucial to letting smalls like Artest and Bonzi operate freely from the block.
playmaker0017 said:See - I still go back to this:
I think Adelman is the one that needs to go. Not Reef, not Miller. But, rather Adelman.
With Artest, budding Martin and a PG that at least TRIES on defense ... I think the "need" for a defensive big that dominates goes away a lot. Our biggest problem is the lack of commitment to defense. I've seen Bibby walk down the court on defense or Miller jump out of the way. It's sad. That's coaching.
We've got enough talent offensively to put up points. What we need is a coach that sticks to fundamentals and defense. Someone not afraid to exert a bit of control on this team.
The problem is that for the most part - the center doesn't leave the post ... and with a defensive PF ... the PF will now clog the lane.
It's not that Miller and Bibby CAN'T play defense, in my opinion. It's that they DON'T play defense.
nbrans said:In the last 10 games defense hasn't really been the problem when the Kings have struggled. The defense has been pretty good, as has the rebounding. Offense has been the problem.
Things changed when Artest arrived, and I think people take offense for granted around here. Inserting a nonscoring roleplayer into a lineup that is struggling to score is a risky proposition, particularly when you're removing someone who not only scores 15 ppg but opens up the floor for people to operate inside.
Sure, removing Miller and inserting a defensive specialist will improve the defense, but at what cost to the offense? Is a defensive specialist going to stop more points than Miller creates, both with his own scoring and the opportunities he creates for others?
Entity said:Big Luke who is on our roster in the d-league is averaging 1.4 blks ber game
Tell that to Chris Andersen.MrBiggs said:1.4 blocks in the d-league. That equates to what? Like about .6 blocks per 48 minutes in the NBA?
SacKings4Life21 said:Ok I have been reading all of these discussions on brining in Pryz, Chandler, griffin... and honestly i have reserched that to and liked it. but we need to realize 1 huge problem! What team has won a championship ever! without a super star. I am very, i mean very high on Artest. He is my favoite player in the league. But can he provide the franchise with super star responsibilities? I think he absolutly could... but becase of the uncertainty he will need a partnet. Artest needs a pippen. Shaq had kobe, Duncan has ginobili/parker. Artest needs a PF who can help his intense role to win it all. I liek this additon talks. but in all honestly we need offensive post presence to go with the Defense. WE need a all star PF. No team wins without 2 allstars. miller/bibbey.... eh.... Im not a huge bibby fan, tho i love miller he doesnt play D. I dont have an answer becase there are no availible all star bigs for hte 4 position. KT/Shereef. cannot bring us to the glory land, tho they are solid role players. LEt me know what yall think...
SacKings4Life21 said:Ok I have been reading all of these discussions on brining in Pryz, Chandler, griffin... and honestly i have reserched that to and liked it. but we need to realize 1 huge problem! What team has won a championship ever! without a super star. I am very, i mean very high on Artest. He is my favoite player in the league. But can he provide the franchise with super star responsibilities? I think he absolutly could... but becase of the uncertainty he will need a partnet. Artest needs a pippen. Shaq had kobe, Duncan has ginobili/parker. Artest needs a PF who can help his intense role to win it all. I liek this additon talks. but in all honestly we need offensive post presence to go with the Defense. WE need a all star PF. No team wins without 2 allstars. miller/bibbey.... eh.... Im not a huge bibby fan, tho i love miller he doesnt play D. I dont have an answer becase there are no availible all star bigs for hte 4 position. KT/Shereef. cannot bring us to the glory land, tho they are solid role players. LEt me know what yall think...
trueEntity said:Chandler doesn't impress me much. I thought he was better on defense than what i have seen. His offense is aweful. Actually the only thing he can do is rebound.
hanchiho said:true
SacKings4Life21 said:do you guys really feel confident in a front line of miller and ty chan? with testy mike and bonzi (hopfully)? i mean thats nice with defense but who will score on a low post play? i think we will need someone to be a consistant scorer down low.