Kings-Hawks game discussion for March 17

Status
Not open for further replies.
From what ive seen so far...
The Refs are bad
Martin is actually playing physical D
We are getting manhandeled on the inside
Calvin Booth needs our 09 MLE....

Refs - agree
Masrtin - agree
Inside - agree
Booth - are you out of your mind? :p
 
I think the weakest part of JT's game is his footwork. He will definately improve around the basket after that gets better.
 
I think the Hawks would be doing all right if they didn't have to try to carry Joe Johnson's sorry *** all game long.
 
No joke -- if you had been watching the game. He was completely miserable...until the 4th. 4-15, 6 TOs. He was the only reason the Kings were close.

then he realized a game was on.

If I had been watching the game? Does it sound like I haven't been watching the game? And no, the reason the Kings were close was because Atlanta was in the penalty with over 6min to go in the 3rd.
 
If I had been watching the game? Does it sound like I haven't been watching the game? And no, the reason the Kings were close was because Atlanta was in the penalty with over 6min to go in the 3rd.


Well if you have been wtahcing the game, and you had somehow missed the supreme sucking sound coming from Johnson...then you still weren't watchign the game. ;)
 
Well if you have been wtahcing the game, and you had somehow missed the supreme sucking sound coming from Johnson...then you still weren't watchign the game. ;)

An nba game is 48min, not 36min, right? I prefer to wait to judge a performance after the game has finished. I can't believe I am sticking up for our opponent.
 
Hawes is looking like Mikki Moore on the boards... this offense only crap is wayyyyy old! we all know you can score! freak'n grab boards and block shots or sit on the bench... play Calvin Booth as far as I care but this 4 board crap is weaksauce!
 
An nba game is 48min, not 36min, right? I prefer to wait to judge a performance after the game has finished. I can't believe I am sticking up for our opponent.

I hate to intervene here, but I believe Brick was judging Johnson's performance up until that point in the game. I think stating that a player hasn't performed well is perfectly fine. He also, at a later point, acknowledged that Johnson didn't play well until the 4th. I don't see whats wrong with what he's saying.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top