what i want to know is if anybody really believes that any *available* coach being discussed in this thread would lead the kings to 5 straight 50+ win seasons and 7 consecutive playoff appearances.
why **** with what works? i sincerely do not understand. change for the sake of change doesn't work for players unless they're malcontents (see ron artest), and last time i checked, change for the sake of change never helped any coaching position, either (and, for the record, rick adelman is hardly a trouble maker). if the kings were a lottery team after the artest trade, we would be having this discussion, but after making the playoffs and with a bright future ahead, what reason was there to mess with what was shaping up to be a winning formula? obviously, the cement had not dried yet, but a foundation was being laid, and adelman was a clear part of that foundation. now the team is gonna be forced to start from scratch........again. there would have been continuity going into next season, but no, why do things "the right way" by extending rick adelman his due?
the maloofs exercised very poor judgement in this instance, and i am extremely disappointed.