What I don’t understand is when fox and ty start and one has a bad game, it’s cuz they can’t work together and will never work. Ty and davion start and one of them has a bad game…trade fox, davion and ty are the future!
Their commentators are unbearable. I have no clue why I haven’t turned sound off.
Their commentators are unbearable. I have no clue why I haven’t turned sound off.
Watching the dubs broadcast and they had one instance where the dubs passed up 4 open shots. Then Damion Lee gets the ball at the elbow, dribbles to the perimeter and makes a three. Kings defensive shape is a joke and man, it’s infectious when you have a team that shares the ball. Buddy looks like he’s 40 yrs old and Holmes is getting out worked by Warriors wings and bigs. Just trade everyone already, Monte.
I wanted to draft a wing. But now that we have all 3, rotate the 3 and get rid of buddy. But that’s beside the point. I just want to know why when the situations are the same, the outcry is different. Ty or fox have a bad game, it’s cuz they can’t play together. Ty or davion have a bad game, they are the future. It’s not like we are on a win streak when they start or anything. Maybe, just maybe, the issue isn’t fox/ty/davion.Is your idea to keep all three point guards?
The Kings share the ball, it's who they eventually share it to that's the problem.
I wanted to draft a wing. But now that we have all 3, rotate the 3 and get rid of buddy. But that’s beside the point. I just want to know why when the situations are the same, the outcry is different. Ty or fox have a bad game, it’s cuz they can’t play together. Ty or davion have a bad game, they are the future. It’s not like we are on a win streak when they start or anything. Maybe, just maybe, the issue isn’t fox/ty/davion.
Watching the dubs broadcast and they had one instance where the dubs passed up 4 open shots. Then Damion Lee gets the ball at the elbow, dribbles to the perimeter and makes a three. Kings defensive shape is a joke and man, it’s infectious when you have a team that shares the ball. Buddy looks like he’s 40 yrs old and Holmes is getting out worked by Warriors wings and bigs. Just trade everyone already, Monte.
Everyone making money looks beyond checked out. I just don't see how you look at this and think we're anywhere close to being a play-off team.
Which is why even good young players should be available, for a better fitting return
The thought is to at least look for a better fitting lineup. If you find it, then great. You have to at least consider it, if you're a GM trying to do your job
One pass, maybe two passes at most per possession is a far cry from 3 to 4 passes and teammates setting double screens and then resetting it.
It seems to me that "fit" depends on the core players. Why not have the core be the good, young, inexpensive players, and build around them?
Fit should never be a concern when you're a bad team. Only talent.
Everyone making money looks beyond checked out. I just don't see how you look at this and think we're anywhere close to being a play-off team.
Have to disagree. You'll never build a winning culture, without having a good enough fit to start approaching a .500 record
Have to disagree. You'll never build a winning culture, without having a good enough fit to start approaching a .500 record
Wins come with talent. Luka, Trae, JJJ, Ayton, Ja, Zion, Evan Mobley, LaMelo Ball. Once you have 1-3 of those guys, that's when you start caring about fit around them.
A perfectly fitting 39 win team doesn't make sense. You need that talent upside for fit to matter.
Wins come with talent. Luka, Trae, JJJ, Ayton, Ja, Zion, Evan Mobley, LaMelo Ball. Once you have 1-3 of those guys, that's when you start caring about fit around them.
A perfectly fitting 39 win team doesn't make sense. You need that talent upside for fit to matter.
Losing 5 of our last 6 and about to lose 6 outta 7. I don’t think we are finding anything different except maybe fox/ty/davion might not be the problem. I just don’t see the big upgrade from fox/ty to davion/ty, especially from the fox and ty will never work together crowd. My argument isn’t if one combo is better than the other, it’s the fact that the situation is the same but people see it differently. Let’s say Fox and ty start 3 games and lose. In each game fox scores 30+ and ty shoots 3/10. The argument is they can’t work together. Now imagine davion and ty start 3 games and lose all 3. In each game davion scores 30 and the ty shoots 3/10. I’d bet not a peep about chemistry. That’s all I’m saying.The thought is to at least look for a better fitting lineup. If you find it, then great. You have to at least consider it, if you're a GM trying to do your job