This gets boring. I know what brick and piksi want and understand that their superior intellect allows them to see the bigger picture but I will never root for this team to lose.
This gets boring. I know what brick and piksi want and understand that their superior intellect allows them to see the bigger picture but I will never root for this team to lose.
well, we everybody healthy, Salmons doesn't go 12-21 with 11/7. Cisco isn't on the floor ho hit a late three and Navaro doesn't shoot 2-13 against Bibby.
If You think that when other guys come back - the team will raise the level - think again. Guys that are playing well will play less and lose efficiency. There won't be a big difference in overall record.
And while we laugh winning this tonight - coming june Grizzlies will have a last laugh and as You could see tonight - they draft well.
Whatever, i think we will be a much better team with our all stars back and memphis didnt have the last laugh in the 07 draft. There were supposed to get Oden or Durrant. We only had 10 available players and basically used 8, great win no matter how you slice it.
It isn't just us and we aren't rooting for the team to lose. We just don't want this team to continue staying mediocre until infinity. We don't jump from joy after beating a pathetic Grizzlies team like one of the Maloofs did tonight. He was jumping around just like he did when we were really good and beating really good teams. I am afraid that he has lost a touch with reality here.
And it's no secret that Gavin Maloof is a fan first and foremost and an excitable fan at that. He was caught up in the moment just like everyone else in Arco. And I honestly cannot see any problem with that at all.
What's he supposed to do? Sit there and frown?
The Maloof's care ONLY about the # of butts in the seats at Arco. It's been around 12,500 on average this season with only one or two so-called home sell outs. If this Kings team was to tank by design which is impossible for Coach Theus to stomach just to name one person - attendance could nose dive to the point of utter contempt by the "best fans in the NBA" (although Golden State fans may have now taken that mantle). With all the various problems the Kings franchise has (arena, etc.) tanking on purpose is obviously unacceptable to most in Sactown.
But Kevin Durant isn't on the team. And fans in Sacramento want something to root for when they go to the games - and over 12,000 people a night are still going. While the intellectuals worry about the big picture, the more emotional fan will just cheer for the now. That's just the way it is...
I get that part but if we keep being mediocre people will stop showing up anyways and we are on a good way to do just that. Maybe if they lowered ticket prices to fit the quality of the product. Now just imagine us having let's say Kevin Durant on our team right now. The whole perspective would be different.
again - I get the point. I just don't know - what that "now" is ??? What is the purpose of the "now" ?
That is generally an reasonable stance (snideness aside) -- as opposed to the faux mystification professed sometimes, just an admission that a) the problem is understood; but b) can't go there.
Thing is, and this has been covered many times on this board too, there comes a point when you rooting for your team is actually you rooting against your team. When your team gets hurt in the long term if what you want to happen actually happens in the short term. That is the tricky perplexing part. In the most extreme case you can find yourself having the same rooting interest in a game as a Lakers fan hoping you win so that you don't get that young stud which will revive your franchise.
Feel free to point out to me the game where our normal trio has put up better than 75 points 19rebs 11ast, had one guy nearly go for a triple double, and another hit the big clutch shot to win it.
You woudl be damn lucky to get that out of Mike/Kevin/Ron. Or for that matter any little man trio.
2)Compete at current level, while trying to improve through 'free agency', trades, and attained draft picks.
Pros
Keep organizations' dignity, keep the respect of the fans and the rest of league(competition)
Cons
Odds of attaining a 'franchise' player are higher
I'm for option 2. Others may not see it this way and are entitled to their opinions, this is mine.
COMPETE AT WHAT LEVEL? That's what the Kings have been doing the last couple of years. what do have to show for it? Hawes and Price and Doubly. What has our record look like in that time span. Time for a total rebuild.
not sure which team you are watching...but with the current talent we can compete with anyone in the league.
Obviously you can't ask players to tank.
And obviously you can't ask the coaching staff to tank.
If you want to positively affect your draft position, that decision really has to come from the owners and GM. They accomplish that by removing the assets from a team, mainly in the form of players, that are likely to get the team more wins in the short-term.
Everyone with me on that?
Now here's the dilemma that arises. Say we trade Bibby, Artest, Miller, for draft pick, young guys, or expiring contracts in an effort to have a crappy season followed by a good draft.
And the young and untested guys we have left step up and win 38 games for us anyway.
Then what? Are we going to say that our GM should have done more to sabotage our season? Where does this end?
~~
Now here's the dilemma that arises. Say we trade Bibby, Artest, Miller, for draft pick, young guys, or expiring contracts in an effort to have a crappy season followed by a good draft.
And the young and untested guys we have left step up and win 38 games for us anyway.
Then what? Are we going to say that our GM should have done more to sabotage our season? Where does this end?
~~
dilemma? that's ideal! having young guys play up to their potential, AND draft picks + free agency money to complement that roster? are you kidding???