I just believe if a player is going to get praise when he does good, he also deserves criticism when he does bad. After 1 SL, people were coming out like they were right about Giles all along.
I know it's only SL. I actually care much less about Giles than I do Bagley anyways.
This may be news to you, but there's a standard cycle to how players are evaluated.
In years 1-2: upside is given far more attention, bad performance written off to inexperience
By year 3 or 4, a lot more focus on the negatives and making a call as to whether the player is gonna make it in the league or not.
As veterans, good/bad doesn't really move the needle. If Garrett Temple drops 40 points in a game nobody is calling him the next NBA superstar.