He didn't call Game 5.
Game 3, maybe? When Nash couldn't by a field goal in the first half, Stoudemire missed two dunks, when the Suns got outrebounded, outscored in the paint, etc.? When everything was going the Spurs way all game long, and they managed to pull out a close one at the end? You're talking about a team that doesn't shoot more than 15 free throws a game, but shot 27 in that one, against a team that lives at the free throw line.
I mean, we're talking about two teams that traded shots back and forth for a whole series, the game is tied through three quarters, and then, when the Lakers were facing elimination, all of a sudden, this completely noticeable shift in officiating happens and the Lakers, who had only taken 13 free throws all game, shoot 27 in the fourth quarter. It was dirty, and it cost the Kings the game. No doubt about it.
I mean, I know the Suns got the short end in that series (though that can't be blamed on the refs) but Game 3 wasn't dirty. Donaghy called it, and that's suspicious in and of itself, but I don't think he called any of the last three fouls against Stoudemire. And even if it was dirty, it's Game 3, in a 1-1 series. Not Game 6 in a 3-2 series, and the team that's on the ropes gets an 18 free throw advantage in the fourth quarter of a tie game. That's blatant.
And regardless of how long ago it was, Kings fans have every right to be upset about it, without having to hear about the Suns and Tim Donaghy and how they "really have something to complain about". The Kings got hosed in a series-deciding game, and had they not been hosed, they would have won the series that night. That's what happened, and no amount of time or other officiating scandal is going to change what happened May 31st, 2002.
. 
