we lose Cuz, we suck, Kings lose high draft pick to Philly. Bad.
One year goes buy.
Kings still suck, we get the same level draft pick and start rebuilding like we would if there was no Philly trade, just with only one year delay (not years).
So missing on a KAT, Porzingis, Anthony Davis, John Wall, Kyrie Irving, DeMarcus Cousinss, Ben Simmons, Andrew Wiggins, Joel Embiid type of player wouldn't set us back as a franchise for years? Because that's what you're giving up the opportunity to draft when dealing a top 5 pick.
Or maybe the draft is a total bust this year, but the next one we get the #1 pick and the player. No point worrying about it now.
The bigger issue is if we lose Cuz. At that point it really doesnt matter because we have failed. That would mean we need to start over from the top down.
there are a variety of scenarios that could play out, but there is definitely a point to worrying about it now. the state of the kings' future draft picks is dependent upon what happens with cuz. the franchise will certainly do everything in their power to keep him, but they can't pretend like their future draft picks don't matter.
even if cousins doesn't leave and the kings manage to earn a playoff spot, first rounders remain an important way to add cost-controlled talent to a roster, particularly when that roster is talent deficient. do playoff teams regularly find star-level players with their less-than-desirable draft position? no, not usually. but it's also not a rarity for these teams to find contributors that they can integrate into their existing game plan and team culture. the san antonio spurs immediately spring to mind. the point i'm trying to make--and i won't speak for The_Jamal, but he seems to be making a similar point--is that non-playoff teams who gamble with future first rounders almost always regret it. in this case, the new york knicks and brooklyn nets immediately spring to mind.
now, the scenario you presented could be spot on; the upcoming draft could be a total bust, and the following draft could land a hypothetical cousins-less kings team a future superstar. we just don't know, and that's why this matters. the kings have been a western conference basement-dweller for a decade, and if they continue to mismanage their assets, it's not out of the realm of possibility that they will remain in the basement for another half-decade or more. again, if the team transforms itself into a playoff contender because of a strong partnership between big cuz and coach joerger, then it may not matter at all. but after ten long years of futility, that's an awful lot to hope for, and a good gm doesn't stake the future of a franchise on hope.
I just want some clarification here. You are a Celtics fan. BUT your second favorite team is one of the furthest teams from them, the Kings. You dont spend time on Celtics boards but do spend time on a Kings board. The majority of your posts are Kings negative and the occasional trade to make the Kings worse but the Celtics bstter. How. Do. You. Fit. In?
Interesting read below on Cousins
http://amicohoops.net/execs-offer-takes-on-kings-cousins-conundrum/
Interesting read below on Cousins
http://amicohoops.net/execs-offer-takes-on-kings-cousins-conundrum/
Sound like Pete D is the West conference exec.lol. Still he is right even if he is a weaselInteresting read below on Cousins
http://amicohoops.net/execs-offer-takes-on-kings-cousins-conundrum/
Sound like Pete D is the West conference exec.lol. Still he is right even if he is a weasel
There's no such thing as an interesting read by Sam amico
Everyone against the Kings.....Crazy
What about Josh Smith?
The guy may be washed up, but the fact remains, we have a clear need for veteran bigs right now. We're playing a similar style offense to Malone, but the biggest difference I'm noticing is that we were dominant on the boards under Malone, while right now, we're ranked near the bottom of the league in rebounds (not to mention blocks). KK and Cuz may work OK with each other but they're clearly not the long term answer, and i'm not enjoying the small ball substitutions since Willie can't get his head out of his a**. Smith could probably be had for the vet minimum, and while his shot has looked broken in the years past, he does have the ability to stretch the floor and rebound. Obviously a trade for a long term solution would be best, but who knows, maybe he's still got something left in the tank.
BOS Gets: Anthony Morrow, Ben McLemore, Kosta Koufos, & Willie Cauley-Stein
BOS Gives: Kelly Olynyk, Terry Rozier, Tyler Zeller, & BOS 2019 1st (Lottery Protected)
CHI Gets: Kelly Olynyk, Omri Casspi, & BOS 2019 1st (Lottery Protected)
CHI Gives: Bobby Portis, Michael Carter-Williams, & changing Kings' 2017 1st protection to Top 12 protected (was Top 10)
OKC Gets: Rudy Gay & Ty Lawson
OKC Gives: Anthony Morrow, Cameron Payne, & Kyle Singler
SAC Gets: Bobby Portis, Cameron Payne, Kyle Singler, Michael Carter-Williams, Terry Rozier, Tyler Zeller, & increased protection to Top 12 on Kings' 2017 1st
SAC Gives: Ben McLemore, Kosta Koufos, Omri Casspi, Rudy Gay, Ty Lawson, & Willie Cauley-Stein
I'd probably be hesitant to do this trade as I think it would make us worse this year, but overall, I think it would be a nice return for 4 expirings, Koufos, & Cauley-Stein, and would make sure we're not bleeding talent next year. Also, Rozier, Payne, & Portis have shown good potential in the minutes they have received thus far and all project to be excellent fits next to Cousins. We need more talent, and signing that talent may be difficult, so acquiring players with potential and having Joerger develop them may be the best way to form a formidable team around Cousins. Increasing the likelihood that we keep our 2017 1st is also very important as it gives us another shot at bringing in a game changer.
If we were to make this trade, draft Tatum/Isaac with our 2017 1st, & steal Otto Porter away from the Wizards with a hefty offer sheet, we would have 2 young players with good potential at every position.
PG - Rozier/Payne
SG - Bogdanovic/Richardson
SF - Porter/Isaac
PF - Portis/Labissiere
C - Cousins/Papagiannis
That team would suddenly have a future, and won that has the potential to be a very good team in the west if Joerger can develop a lot of these kids to reach their potential.
I will acknowledge that adding a lot of these kids is risky in that it might make us not competitive in the beginning which might force Cousins out of town. However, I'm finding it tougher and tougher to see where we will be able to acquire enough talent to become a top 4 seed/compete for a championship. If it comes down to keeping Cousins and topping out as a bottom tier playoff team vs. trading Cousins and acquiring young assets to start over/try again, I lean towards trading Cousins. Having said that, if Cousins buys into this movement, understands the vision/goal, and is willing to resign with us, there's no way I'm moving the best C in the game.
I think that core would be a great defensive unit with shooters all around Cousins to make his life easier. I even think we could surprise some people looking as how Rozier, Porter, & Portis can all contribute now while guys like Payne, Bogdanovic, & Labissiere could be X factors if they are ready to contribute to a winning team next year. Obviously, we'd still have Temple & Barnes under contract to help bridge the gap between players ready to contribute and those that might need a little more time, but the hope is to really build towards a team that can potentially challenge for a top seed in the West.
Trying to build our team exclusively through free agency (hoping we can land that big time free agent) is also a very risky move looking at our past history. Acquiring some young players with good potential and focusing on development may not only be the best way to build a talented team around Cousins, but it is low risk in that it leaves us with the right type of assets in case we have to move on from Cousins.
I don't want to be too critical, but in general, I don't like multiplayer/multiteam trades. Way too complicated to pull off. Hell, it's hard enough to get one team on board for a trade sometimes, much less four teams. Plus, I want no part of Michael Carter-Williams. I don't like guards that can't shoot. Not to mention, we end up with three PG's in that deal. Find a way to get us Portis and Porter and I'm happy with the deal. The best way to solve our PG problem is through the draft, or maybe through freeagency next offseason. Personally, if we manage to resign Collison, then I'd like to draft a PG over 6'3".
This next draft should be loaded with PG's, most of which are of the taller variety. Lonzo Ball - 6'6", Frank Jackson - 6'3", De'Aaron Fox - 6'3", Isaiah Brisco - 6'3", Markelle Fultz - 6'4", and Dennis Smith - 6'3". All these guys are likely to play in the NBA, and many of them will become starters. There are some dark horses like Northwestern's Bryant McIntosh who will surprise some people. Point is, this next draft could fill our need for a very good PG, so we should figure out a way to nab one of them.
The Nets have released G. Vasquez. We know he can't defend but he can quarterback an offense. What I guess I'm getting at here is plz cut Lawson.
Just read small print he needs ankle surgery.That's silly on a number of fronts.
that was one of the frontsJust read small print he needs ankle surgery.
Trust me. I want no part of Carter-Williams either. He is strictly filler in this trade, and he would be our 4th PG behind Collison, Rozier, & Payne and would be considered an expiring.
And if this trade were to happen, I don't think you see Collison coming back as you'd be moving forward with Rozier, Payne, & possibly another rookie PG (if we think he's far and away the best player available to take). There's also quite a few SFs that are projected to go in the lottery (Jackson, Tatum, & Isaac). If we can solve our PG rotation through a trade like this, targeting one of those guys at SF would help balance the roster.
If we don't make the trade above, I think we have to try and retain Collison and do exactly what you're recommending (that is if we still have our 2017 1st). If we end up keeping our pick, waive Afflalo, waive Tolliver, don't extend a qualifying offer to McLemore , & give up our bird rights to Gay, we'd have roughly $30-$37 mil in cap space (I'm not sure how the cap hold would work for Bogdanovic so maybe Capt. can help me out here). That's still enough to go get a guy like Porter or (if we can pull it off) Hayward. Who knows? Maybe we can land Porter in FA and have a team that looks like this going into next year:
PG - Collison / Fox
SG - Temple / Bogdanovic / Richardson
SF - Porter / Barnes
PF - Cauley-Stein / Labissiere
C - Cousins / Koufos / Papagiannis
That team still has a lot of youth, and how far we go as team will be decided by how good we are at developing Fox, Bogdanovic, Richardson, Porter, Cauley-Stein, Labissiere, & Papagiannis.
Ibaka seems to be in decline which begs the question is he actually 27? He might be older than what is reported. There's also the concern that Ibaka could very well walk next year for nothing and we're left with neither Ibaka or Cauley-Stein.How about Serge Ibaka. He would spread the floor for DMC while keeping us big and can guard stretch 4s. Orlando is struggling and Serge will be a FA I think by December they look to trade him id offer WCS/Tolliver for Ibaka/2nd. This would make our big rotation DMC, Ibaka, and Koufos. To combat the loss of WCS we'd resign Ibaka to 4 year deal and by than Skal will be primed and ready to start and impact. I think Skal has way more potential than WCS.
If we can't get Portis what do you think of RaShaun Holmes instead he's on a killer deal (making l mil over 3-4 season per) and I think he could be a 10/10 guy with good D (he was a DPOY in his conference in college) he would actually be a bigger version of everything we ever wanted when we drafted T-Rob.BOS Gets: Anthony Morrow, Ben McLemore, Kosta Koufos, & Willie Cauley-Stein
BOS Gives: Kelly Olynyk, Terry Rozier, Tyler Zeller, & BOS 2019 1st (Lottery Protected)
CHI Gets: Kelly Olynyk, Omri Casspi, & BOS 2019 1st (Lottery Protected)
CHI Gives: Bobby Portis, Michael Carter-Williams, & changing Kings' 2017 1st protection to Top 12 protected (was Top 10)
OKC Gets: Rudy Gay & Ty Lawson
OKC Gives: Anthony Morrow, Cameron Payne, & Kyle Singler
SAC Gets: Bobby Portis, Cameron Payne, Kyle Singler, Michael Carter-Williams, Terry Rozier, Tyler Zeller, & increased protection to Top 12 on Kings' 2017 1st
SAC Gives: Ben McLemore, Kosta Koufos, Omri Casspi, Rudy Gay, Ty Lawson, & Willie Cauley-Stein
I'd probably be hesitant to do this trade as I think it would make us worse this year, but overall, I think it would be a nice return for 4 expirings, Koufos, & Cauley-Stein, and would make sure we're not bleeding talent next year. Also, Rozier, Payne, & Portis have shown good potential in the minutes they have received thus far and all project to be excellent fits next to Cousins. We need more talent, and signing that talent may be difficult, so acquiring players with potential and having Joerger develop them may be the best way to form a formidable team around Cousins. Increasing the likelihood that we keep our 2017 1st is also very important as it gives us another shot at bringing in a game changer.
If we were to make this trade, draft Tatum/Isaac with our 2017 1st, & steal Otto Porter away from the Wizards with a hefty offer sheet, we would have 2 young players with good potential at every position.
PG - Rozier/Payne
SG - Bogdanovic/Richardson
SF - Porter/Isaac
PF - Portis/Labissiere
C - Cousins/Papagiannis
That team would suddenly have a future, and won that has the potential to be a very good team in the west if Joerger can develop a lot of these kids to reach their potential.
I will acknowledge that adding a lot of these kids is risky in that it might make us not competitive in the beginning which might force Cousins out of town. However, I'm finding it tougher and tougher to see where we will be able to acquire enough talent to become a top 4 seed/compete for a championship. If it comes down to keeping Cousins and topping out as a bottom tier playoff team vs. trading Cousins and acquiring young assets to start over/try again, I lean towards trading Cousins. Having said that, if Cousins buys into this movement, understands the vision/goal, and is willing to resign with us, there's no way I'm moving the best C in the game.
I think that core would be a great defensive unit with shooters all around Cousins to make his life easier. I even think we could surprise some people looking as how Rozier, Porter, & Portis can all contribute now while guys like Payne, Bogdanovic, & Labissiere could be X factors if they are ready to contribute to a winning team next year. Obviously, we'd still have Temple & Barnes under contract to help bridge the gap between players ready to contribute and those that might need a little more time, but the hope is to really build towards a team that can potentially challenge for a top seed in the West.
Trying to build our team exclusively through free agency (hoping we can land that big time free agent) is also a very risky move looking at our past history. Acquiring some young players with good potential and focusing on development may not only be the best way to build a talented team around Cousins, but it is low risk in that it leaves us with the right type of assets in case we have to move on from Cousins.
How about Serge Ibaka. He would spread the floor for DMC while keeping us big and can guard stretch 4s. Orlando is struggling and Serge will be a FA I think by December they look to trade him id offer WCS/Tolliver for Ibaka/2nd. This would make our big rotation DMC, Ibaka, and Koufos. To combat the loss of WCS we'd resign Ibaka to 4 year deal and by than Skal will be primed and ready to start and impact. I think Skal has way more potential than WCS.