swish - We will agree to disagree. Apparently nothing Webb does will be good enough for you and that's fine.
Dear me. The first thing I said in the thread is Webber has been better than expected. Can't we assess a guy honestly anymore?
swish - We will agree to disagree. Apparently nothing Webb does will be good enough for you and that's fine.
swisshh said:Dear me. The first thing I said in the thread is Webber has been better than expected. Can't we assess a guy honestly anymore?
swisshh said:I was just about on the "Webb's back!" bandwagon, but then he started playing his 'dumb' game again.
funsc said:I'd go for this one. Not taking any credit out from Webb: he's been great this season, but there is still some room for improvement. (hehe... I'm greedy.) I'd like to see him leading this team to win it all.
There's the main difference. I'm not undecided about ANY Kings player, with the possible exception of Eddie House. It's not a matter of jumping on a bandwagon. So, I say again we will agree to disagree ... and I hope by the end of the season that he (Webber) will have convinced even his harshest critics and most cynical non-believers that he is what some of us know to be true.
KP said:I decided to wait till 50 votes to comment again. Interesting results a lot more positive than I would have thought. The A and B "positive" grade options got almost 90% combined together. If we factor in some troll-bys and lakers/mavs fans the % might even be higher. Id have to agree with most of you that he has either exceded some cautious expectations or done what some of us (Webber homers) knew he would do all along. There is of course still room for improvement, some of you mentioned the issues here, but all and all I think Kings fans should be happy with a steadily improving Webber, capped by this recent 10 game stretch. Now the real question is... Do I dare start a Peja or Adelman poll????![]()
More like Jeers.kingskings! said:Interesting take on the poll.
I would consider #1 the homer vote.
#2 and #3 the undecided vote
#4 the "less than thrilled" vote (to refrain from using VF's most disliked phrase EVER).![]()
To consider option #2 a positive would require negating everything said on this board last Spring and this season regarding Webber's condition, ability, and value.
I look at options #2 and #3 as the votes of those who are neither homers or haters but those who truly want to believe in Webb's ability to overcome his injury but who look at the situation without prejudice (or the least prejudice). The people who didn't love his play on his return last Spring but who are still hopeful that he can come back and make this TEAM better. The people who are HAPPY that CWebb plays well with others sometimes (smile) instead of forcing the team onto his back when it's not needed.
Personally, I try to refrain from discussing my opinion of Chris Webber with those in the camp of either option #1 or #4. But I do enjoy discussion with all the others in categories #2 and #3.
Chris Webber neither walks on water or is the spawn of Satan.
He is a skilled player of a game. Whether he is among the best ever (HOF) or simply an almost great or the biggest con artist ever is open to debate. Nobody should mistake him for either extreme at this point in his career. Nobody.
Cheers.
OurYear said:he's hitting those FTs! Go Kings!
Homer!kingskings! said:Most excellent props on the improved free throw shooting, indeed!![]()
KP said:More like Jeers.![]()
Psst I voted for #2...kingskings! said:May I present an excellent example of option #1?
Since my post does not completely agree with KP's opinion, I must be "bashing" Webber...sigh...
It's no wonder we have such divisive threads on this board.![]()
KP said:Homer!![]()
It's all good. A lot of us still need this kind of production were seeing into the playoffs, me included. I was just kidding with you I don't think you were too far off at all.kingskings! said:WRONG!![]()
I fall into the category of "I want to believe and I like most of what I'm seeing" but not everything...![]()
Honestly, I don't know that I'll ever be a Webber homer again, although I spent a lot of years thinking I saw him walk on water too.
P.S. But I'd like to!
KP said:It's all good. A lot of us still need this kind of production were seeing into the playoffs, me included. I was just kidding with you I don't think you were too far off at all.![]()
swisshh said:Yeah, but you're one of many ...positive if regardless fans. I am not anywhere near being Webber's harshest critic, the rest of the nba and its fans has a much lower opinion of Webber than I do.
KP said:Do I dare start a Peja or Adelman poll????![]()
I just can't understand how you can put your obvious dislike of Webber over your hopes for this team.
BUT having said that, I find it terribly aggravating that he cannot be allowed to have a poor night or make a few bad choices without people wanting to pillorize him.
swisshh said:I don't. I'm just honest about the team and players.
Oh he can have a bad night, but I'd like that he would play like he's having a bad night. Don't keep jacking the jumper if it's not there, involve the teammates, hit the boards, contribute in other ways. I am impressed by Webber's physical progress, but he still has mental lapses. As someone said, he has been playing with the tools he has. Letting the game come to him more, but then at times you see him force it and let that mental improvement falter. You see, the poor transition defense isn't just a here or there thing, its been a problem for Webber his entire career. It's only worsen since the injury. He just looks like he gives up on the play and hopes for some .01% chance of a steal. These sort of issues are the difference between a Championship and another year of dissapointment. This year the dissapointment will be less, because the team obviously isn't up to the caliber it used to be. If personal gets better though, then the team really will be in the run for rings and these "little gripes" will matter immensely between being chumps and champs. I am not trying to change your opinion at all. I just don't think you are understanding my reasoning. I don't have an opinion on this, I am just offering analysis of Webber's play. I'd rather have insight than opinion anyways.
And I guess I'd be inbetween the 2 and 3 on this poll.
swisshh said:Oh he can have a bad night, but I'd like that he would play like he's having a bad night. Don't keep jacking the jumper if it's not there, involve the teammates, hit the boards, contribute in other ways. I am impressed by Webber's physical progress, but he still has mental lapses.
I am not anywhere near being Webber's harshest critic, the rest of the nba and its fans has a much lower opinion of Webber than I do.
funkykingston said:I don't know about the rest of the NBA and its fans, but one thing was a bit surprising to me last week regarding Webber's image.
I was watching Sportscenter after the Kings win against Houston, with two anchors whose names I don't know, just to see what they said about such an incredible game and the Kings last minute heroics.
One of the anchors is describing the action at the end of regulation, saying something along the lines of, "Webber, with a three to tie the game" and the other anchor replies very incredulously, "THAT Chris Webber?"
Whether he was implying simply that Webber isn't widely considered a good three point shooter (although we've seen him hit some big ones) or that (as I think he was) that Webb has a reputation for being a choker, is a tough thing to judge definitively. Either way, the surprise in his voice clearly showed that he didn't expect CWebb to be able to hit the game winner.
True or not, there are still some very negative perceptions of CWebb around the league, especially by the media.