Who has played their last game as a King?

Who has played their last game as a King?

  • Evans

    Votes: 12 22.2%
  • Jimmer

    Votes: 3 5.6%
  • JT

    Votes: 3 5.6%
  • Greene

    Votes: 43 79.6%
  • Hayes

    Votes: 8 14.8%

  • Total voters
    54
#31
*Let's call that "variant 1". Variant 2= SG-Thornton, PG-Evans, 6th Thomas. Variant 3= SG-Evans, PG-Thomas 6th-unkown (Thornton traded for SF perhaps), Variant 4 - SG Evans, PG- traded for, 6th THomas, Variant 5- SG- traded for (defender) PG-Evans, 6th IT etc.
Don't forget about variant 7.... PG- Jimmer Fredette SG-Jimmer Fredette SF-Jimmer Fredette PF-Jimmer Fredette C-Jimmer Fredette.
 
#34
It's possible Tyreke could be traded prior to next years trade deadline, but if that does happen, it would likely happen JUST before the trade deadline. Not in the Summer.
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
#35
Forgive me if I didn't see this but is IT a free agent? If so I bet he won't be back.


Standard two year and a team option contract that has been available for 2nd rounders ever since the Gilbert Arenas situation in Golden State. Be signed through next year, and then the option will of course be picked up for year three. Not sure if they are unrestricted or restricted after that third year though.
 

Glenn

Hall of Famer
#37
I expect him to get $10m+ offers.
I think that is possible and I would match it. We have two competent bigs and if we lose him, we have one. There is no guarantee we could replace him either. I think he has turned out to be a very competent big and we haven't noticed it so much because Cuz is next to him. Anyway, how much talent needs to bleed away before we notice we need to pay for it or never have it? Big guys are worth money simply because they are big and he is more than just a tall guy.
 
#38
If I had to pick between the ones listed, Greene. JT comes in 2nd. I think its too early to give up on Jimmer. Tyreke is 50-50 at this moment, but I think we hang on to him and move him at the trade deadline for the right pieces. Hayes I think will stay, but like Tyreke, we will try to move him at the trade deadline for the right pieces.
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
#39
If I had to pick between the ones listed, Greene. JT comes in 2nd. I think its too early to give up on Jimmer. Tyreke is 50-50 at this moment, but I think we hang on to him and move him at the trade deadline for the right pieces. Hayes I think will stay, but like Tyreke, we will try to move him at the trade deadline for the right pieces.
Why do people think moving people at the trade dealine is more likely to get you the right pieces? Quite to the contrary, at the deadline there are far fewqer teams interested in trading, and nobody wants to break up their momentum/chemsitry, including btw us. If you know you are going to move a guy the best bet is now.
 
#41
I think that is possible and I would match it. We have two competent bigs and if we lose him, we have one. There is no guarantee we could replace him either. I think he has turned out to be a very competent big and we haven't noticed it so much because Cuz is next to him. Anyway, how much talent needs to bleed away before we notice we need to pay for it or never have it? Big guys are worth money simply because they are big and he is more than just a tall guy.
That is all assuming that the owners are willing to spend. For the past 6 years they have shown NO interest in spending money and building a play off team.

Essentially, I agree with you that its time to stop the talent bleed but unfortunately, its out of our control. Last off-season all this team needed to do was keep it's 2 main free agents and sign a competent SF in a year where the FA market had a number of good SFs that would help out this team immensely. All we did was **** that up and blow a ****load of money on a mediocre players or talented players that just could not possibly fit in with this team. I suspect we will see similar thing this off-season.

We are in a really difficult spot at this point. We have a number of contracts that no other teams would touch with a 10 foot pole (funnily enough, majority of those guys we got in the off-season) and I am talking about Salmons, Hayes, Outlaw and Cisco (though while overpaid, I don't mind him as veteran and a glue guy on the roster)....that's $22.5 million in salaries....in other words half our salaries this year. That IS scary especially when you consider that we have owners who are practically broke and one of our starting 5 guys coming out of contract and likely to get reasonable offers in a FA year where there is a lack of quality PFs.

If we had owners who wanted to spend, all of this is doable but once you tighten the purse strings, things get a whole lot tougher.

Personally, I would bring JT back almost at any cost as I have been saying for years that he is just about as good a 3rd big/spot starter as you could hope for. He is very comparable to other 3rd big types on contending teams...and in some cases better than them. I would also love to bring Williams back on a reasonable 3 year deal as I LOVE how he fits in with the team and especially Tyreke and Cousins. A great role playing 2/3 of the stat sheeting stuffing variety and if he keeps improving that jumpshot he could prove to be as much of a bargain for us as Bobby Jackson was. Many games this year, the Williams-Evans pairing showed how good it can be defensively and offensively.

Those 2 would be my main free agents that I would like to bring back. Outside of that, I would love to do a sign and trade for Batum and I would absolutely sacrifice Thornton to get that done. I would also love to see us bring in a veteran shotblocking/rebounding PF/C to play next to Cousins and bring JT off the bench. I would ring Houston and ask if they are interested in Hayes for Dalembert swap and if not, I would be placing a phone call to Camby. As an old, experienced vet, Camby would be a great influence in the locker room and IMHO could only be a good thing for developing Whiteside and to lesser extent Cousins.

Next up would be a defensively oriented PG who can be effective as a primary ball handler and playing off the ball as a SG type if needed. We had that in Beno (minus the defensively oriented part) and I would like to get that back. That is why I would like to see someone like Kirk Hinrich come in and provide some leadership and play off experience.

That would be it for me and in all likelihood, we would have a better team and still at 85% (or there abouts) of the salary cap room which is the bare minimum for next season. I would LOVE to get rid off the bad contracts but I suspect that we are stuck with them.

Oh and I would LOVE to flick Smart and bring in McMillan but that is a pipe dream (as is all of the above) because a) we have broke owners and are rightfully a laughing stock as a franchise and b) no self respecting coach or a player would come to play for this team under this ownership with this much uncertainty around the place....not to mention the coach we have now.

We are in a really **** position simply because out owners are not able to spend money to make us better. If we had Maloofs of the 1999 variety, we would get out of this mess quicker than you could blink but this version of Maloofs (broke and in denial) and we are up a **** creek without a canoe.

I just hope we can keep our core intact before these dickheads sell the team to someone capable of being an NBA owner.
 
#42
The only one I'm quite sure is gone is Greene. He is a good guy, but he has not proven anything in his years with the Kings. We have too many useless Sfs, we need to clear space.
I hope we don't make the mistake of trading Tyreke. Just let him play SG, having the ball in his hands. Let's see if this summer he finally improves his jump shot. I don't want to trade him, I'm pretty sure we would get the short end of that trade.
We better keep JT too. I believe he is worth something around the MLE, even a little more. If someone is dumb enough to give him 10+ millions (but I don't think it'll happen), ok, bye bye JT and good luck. Depending on who we draft, JT can be our starter next year or a very good 3rd big off the bench.
 

bajaden

Hall of Famer
#43
hah. i appreciate the sentiment. i try to post when i have time. unfortunately, i'm coming up on the final three weeks of my last semester of course work as a graduate student. i also teach part time, so it all amounts to a very weighty load that dominates my life, at the moment. i watched the kings stomp the lakers last night, but it was mostly background noise while i slaved away at one of two 20-page seminar papers that i have to complete before may 18...

:(

i'm sure i'll be actively involved in TDOS talk, though, and next semester will be completely devoted to an independent study and work on my thesis, so my schedule will be more flexible, because i won't have classes to go to or classes to teach. it will be nice to see my life normalize a bit, and hopefully it will be nice to see the kings normalize a bit, as well. i'm not as optimistic as i'd like to be, but we'll see what the offseason holds...
I hope to see you here this summer then. Most of the bandwagon posters will be headed for the hills soon. Usually means fewer posts, but more sanity.
 

bajaden

Hall of Famer
#44
You know, I doubt that. The thing about the bigs who get those offers is that its not just any big normally. Its DEFENSIVE bigs that there is such a market for. Mere rotation level bigs, but not defensive specialists, aren't that same level of hot commodity. I'm trying to think of anybody like that who actually got offered that big $10mil type money. His peers likely seem more like Collison money or Villanueva money or even Hayes money.
I agree! I really doubt he'll get that kind of offer. Its easy to say someone will offer that much, but first a team has to have 10 mil above the cap in order to make that offer. Second, of all the freeagents available, is JT the guy your going to blow all your capspace on? I haven't taken a look at each teams capspace for this coming offseason yet, but in general, less than half the teams in the league have any capspace to work with, and those that have a lot of space, are usually shooting for the stars. We'll be around 14 to 15 mil under that cap, unless we amnesty Salmons. I would bet most of JT's offers will be MLE offers. Somewhere between 5 and 6 mil. And I suspect we would match that offer.
 
#45
If JT gets any offers around the MLE they need to let him go. This team won't fall flat without him, it would certainly miss his presence, but certainly not fall flat.

I think all 3 of Evans, JT, and Greene are gone.
You wouldn't even pay JT the MLE????

Remind me never to let you be GM of the Kings. Of COURSE you pay JT the MLE! I'd say about 7-8mil a year is what he's worth, however I would not be surprised if he was offered close to 9 or even 10.
 

bajaden

Hall of Famer
#46
Greene, barring his offering to play for free (not legal anyway) is gone. Fredette barring being included in a trade, is back next season. Ditto Honeycutt and Whiteside. All three players are relatively cheap in total, and there's that word potential. Evans is back, unless a no brainer trade is offered. No, I have no idea what that trade would be. Unless we either trade or amnesty Salmons, were stuck with him. Ditto Outlaw. Personally I'm praying at the altar of recycled players that the real Outlaw is the one we saw the last few games.

Its been stated by the Kings that they want JT back. Its been stated by JT that the Kings want him back. What hasn't been stated by JT, is that he wants to be back. If he has, I missed it. I hope he does, but I would certainly understand if he didn't. He has slowly evolved into a very solid PF. But, not a star. So I hope the offers are reasonable, and we can match. I have it on good account from Grant and Jerry, that IT will be back, and better than ever. Naturally Hayes and Thornton will return, unless of course the Mayan calendar rumor is true, then none of this matters.

Turns out that the only two salaries of importance that can be eliminated are Greene's and JT's. And we don't want to eliminate JT's. Well, not entirely true. We have the option on both Whiteside and Honeycutt, so who knows for sure. But I doubt they'll be cut loose, and if one of them is, its Honeycutt. So any big changes will have to come by way of the draft and trades. We only have so many roster spots, and we don't have room for two new draft picks and a couple of freeagents, unless we rid ourselves of some dead weight,

If I'm counting correctly, we have 8 players on guaranteed contracts. Two players with a team option, and one player thats a restricted freeagent that we want to resign. And if done, that would bring us to 11 players on the roster. That still leaves Williams in limbo, and possibly gone. Add two draftpicks and your up to 13 players, and the only freeagent you would have signed is JT. Not exactly a bold change. So something would have to give somewhere. I won't speculate because I have no clue. Should be either a very interesting, or boring summer.
 
#47
I am predicting a frustrating summer! You can't get better unless you spend and we do not have the capacity to do that. I am expecting a repeat of the last offseason! :(
 
#48
Greene, barring his offering to play for free (not legal anyway) is gone. Fredette barring being included in a trade, is back next season. Ditto Honeycutt and Whiteside. All three players are relatively cheap in total, and there's that word potential. Evans is back, unless a no brainer trade is offered. No, I have no idea what that trade would be. Unless we either trade or amnesty Salmons, were stuck with him. Ditto Outlaw. Personally I'm praying at the altar of recycled players that the real Outlaw is the one we saw the last few games.

Its been stated by the Kings that they want JT back. Its been stated by JT that the Kings want him back. What hasn't been stated by JT, is that he wants to be back. If he has, I missed it. I hope he does, but I would certainly understand if he didn't. He has slowly evolved into a very solid PF. But, not a star. So I hope the offers are reasonable, and we can match. I have it on good account from Grant and Jerry, that IT will be back, and better than ever. Naturally Hayes and Thornton will return, unless of course the Mayan calendar rumor is true, then none of this matters.

Turns out that the only two salaries of importance that can be eliminated are Greene's and JT's. And we don't want to eliminate JT's. Well, not entirely true. We have the option on both Whiteside and Honeycutt, so who knows for sure. But I doubt they'll be cut loose, and if one of them is, its Honeycutt. So any big changes will have to come by way of the draft and trades. We only have so many roster spots, and we don't have room for two new draft picks and a couple of freeagents, unless we rid ourselves of some dead weight,

If I'm counting correctly, we have 8 players on guaranteed contracts. Two players with a team option, and one player thats a restricted freeagent that we want to resign. And if done, that would bring us to 11 players on the roster. That still leaves Williams in limbo, and possibly gone. Add two draftpicks and your up to 13 players, and the only freeagent you would have signed is JT. Not exactly a bold change. So something would have to give somewhere. I won't speculate because I have no clue. Should be either a very interesting, or boring summer.
JT's been saying that he would like to stay in Sacramento, but that he can't guarantee he will be a King etc. Not exactly the overt I love Sacramento, Kings 4 eva!!! response you'd want to hear, but nothing negative either I suppose.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
#49
Its when it pops above the MLE it starts to get dicey. But I don't know whether teams are going to throw that at him given our ability to match or not. At MLE level Jason is worth it, even as a thrid big. As I mentioend in the grades a couple of games ago, Jason is very muc inline with the third bigs of the championship contenders: Taj Gibson, Udonis Haslem, Nick Collison, any of the San Antonio guys. Given that he's also a good character guy, that's exactly a wqell fitting peice you want to just lock down, say that you have your #1 center and your 3rd big, and just go out and try to find the missing peice between them -- the #1PF/shotblocker that we lost with Dalembert.

We've got certain pieces here. Just identify them, clear the riffraf and go.

Pieces that will work, holes, and non-fitting fieces that could be moved;

C - Demarcus Cousins
PF - ?? (unknown shotblocking/defending/rebounding roleplayer)
3rd big - Jason thompson

SF -?? (unknown roleplayer, multiple ways to go according to other decisions (defender, shooter, creater))
backup SF - Terrence Williams

SG - Tyreke Evans*
PG - Isaiah Thomas*
6th - Marcus Thornton*

*Let's call that "variant 1". Variant 2= SG-Thornton, PG-Evans, 6th Thomas. Variant 3= SG-Evans, PG-Thomas 6th-unkown (Thornton traded for SF perhaps), Variant 4 - SG Evans, PG- traded for, 6th THomas, Variant 5- SG- traded for (defender) PG-Evans, 6th IT etc.

Of all the rest of the bench, the only guy with a clear role is:

Bench Keeper #1 - Francisco Garcia (vet leaderhip, can fill multipositons, shoot and roleplay)

Everybody else is highly expendable, with a few might as well keep thems (Honeycutt, Whiteside), a few we might be stuck with thems (Outlaw, Hayes, Salmons), and a Jimmer and Donte the first of whom I don't see a place for, but we probably keep jst because we always do. The second who I like and who could have a role as a deep bench stretch 4/5 for certain matchups, but who we probably let go. If not a single one of them returned, as long as we got the Top 8 right, with Cisco as a 9th, we'd be fine. Thornton is the wildcard. What we do with him (start him next to Evans, 6th man or trade) determines if we need a new 3rd backcourt guy as well as the best type of SF roleplayer. The 4th Marcus option, IT/Thornton backourt, while trading Tyreke, is of course the beginning of the little death scenario, and so I prefer to stay on the light side of things.

Leaves my core:
1) Demarcus Cousins
2 )unknown shotblocker
3) Jason Thompson
4) unknown roleplaying SF
5) Terrence Williams
6) Tyreke Evans
7) Isaiah Thomas
8) Marcus Thornton?? <--wildcard, maybe he is the guy, along with the draft pick, who fills our unknown roles above in trade)
9) Franciso Garcia
I largely agree with this take. The problem is, of course, is do you trust our front office to address these needs? After all, those are the exact same holes that the team had last summer at SF and defensive big man--and the team not only failed to address them adequately, but arguably made things worse by spending the combined $16 mil a year on Salmons, Hayes and Outlaw--all of whom did nothing to fix the problems.
 
#50
I am predicting a frustrating summer! You can't get better unless you spend and we do not have the capacity to do that. I am expecting a repeat of the last offseason! :(
The salary minimum will force them to spend to some extent. But I'm not sure "the Maloofs are cheap" angle explains the recent personnel failings. Blame the Maloofs for the arena debacle, for going cheap on coaching and the front office, etc, but at least last summer they seemed willing to spend--they just couldn't get guys to come over (AK47, Crawford). And they even took on more money in the Salmons/Jimmer trade! Perhaps you could say they went cheap on getting Hayes instead of Dalembert, but I think the front office simply doesn't value guys like Dalembert and prefers "skilled" bigs as long as those skills do not include shotblocking or help defense. I would have loved to be in the Tyson Chandler hunt, but when the most appealing market is offering the most money, you're going to lose. I'm glad the team didn't overpay for Nene (clearly, got buyer's remorse) or Jordan (and the Clippers were willing to match anyway). Marc Gasol was probably a pipe dream.

Then again, the only source I've heard that the team offered a decent deal to AK47 was Grant, and since he's gone "Baghdad Bob" for the Maloofs on us, I'm not sure that's all that credible. Carry on.
 
#51
I'll just go on record here and say that if JT is getting a 10 million per year offer, I don't want him. I love the guy, but he's not worth that to us. He's valuable, but he can be replaced at a cheaper number. We have to think about Evans and Cousins contracts soon, and 10mil to the Sacramento Kings is more than 10mil to any other team.

Sam Dalembert has a team option with Houston that I would THINK they opt out of. He's hasn't been great for them, and has recently lost a lot of his minutes to Marcus Camby (another guy we could bring in to replace JT if need be). I actually think this is a strong FA class, which is why I don't think we'll have a whole lot of trouble keeping Thompson around, but if something gets nutty, we have other options. I think there is a slight chance we actually go after Dalembert. We clearly wanted him back last season, and now he'll be cheaper.

In general though, I still think something is going to have to give with one of our guards. I know a lot of people are suggesting moving Thornton to the bench .. but I just don't think he'll go for that. To be fair to him, he doesn't deserve it either. He's really good, and still underrated around here in my mind. He's MUCH better than a lot of starting SG's in the league, so asking him to come off the bench for a 20ish win team doesn't seem realistic to me.
 

Capt. Factorial

trifolium contra tempestatem subrigere certum est
Staff member
#52
If I'm counting correctly, we have 8 players on guaranteed contracts. Two players with a team option, and one player thats a restricted freeagent that we want to resign. And if done, that would bring us to 11 players on the roster. That still leaves Williams in limbo, and possibly gone. Add two draftpicks and your up to 13 players, and the only freeagent you would have signed is JT. Not exactly a bold change. So something would have to give somewhere. I won't speculate because I have no clue. Should be either a very interesting, or boring summer.
I think you missed somebody on your count.

Guaranteed (9): Tyreke, IT, MT, Jimmer, Garcia, Salmons, Outlaw, Cousins, Hayes
Team Option (2): Honeycutt, Whiteside
Restricted (2): Thompson, Greene
Unrestricted (1): Williams

You're right that this could end up being a pretty boring summer. We've got arguably too many players locked up on a team that didn't do too well last year. We've got broke owners who really can't afford to amnesty a bad contract (which could be either Garcia/Salmons). And you've got a lot of young players that you don't want to give up on. Greene is probably a casualty. Williams is another possible casualty despite how well he played for us simply because of the numbers game. Too many guards! I really have no idea how the front office feels about Honeycutt - he sure didn't get much playing time even toward the end of the year, so he might be allowed to walk, but he comes very, very cheap so maybe not. Whiteside hasn't shown much yet, but with only two bigs under contract it would be hard to let him go.

But we're in a situation where if we bring back both of the cheap youngsters on team options (who play at positions we're thin at) and JT, that's 12 and our first-rounder makes 13. That's before considering T-Will and any possible free agents. So I almost think that we'll need to spend our second rounder on a stashable Euro prospect. Then, GP is going to have to work some magic. And it may take magic this year, given where we are.
 
#53
Standard two year and a team option contract that has been available for 2nd rounders ever since the Gilbert Arenas situation in Golden State. Be signed through next year, and then the option will of course be picked up for year three. Not sure if they are unrestricted or restricted after that third year though.
I thought 2nd rounders only had a 1 year deal and then they were restricted free agents.
 
#55
Its been stated by the Kings that they want JT back. Its been stated by JT that the Kings want him back. What hasn't been stated by JT, is that he wants to be back. If he has, I missed it. I hope he does, but I would certainly understand if he didn't. He has slowly evolved into a very solid PF. But, not a star. So I hope the offers are reasonable, and we can match. I have it on good account from Grant and Jerry, that IT will be back, and better than ever. Naturally Hayes and Thornton will return, unless of course the Mayan calendar rumor is true, then none of this matters.
And keeping Greene is the best way to keep JT. I bet if Greene goes then most likely JT will go too. Greene only has a $2.5m QO. Not reason not to offer it and see if he gets any other offers.
 

bajaden

Hall of Famer
#56
I think you missed somebody on your count.

Guaranteed (9): Tyreke, IT, MT, Jimmer, Garcia, Salmons, Outlaw, Cousins, Hayes
Team Option (2): Honeycutt, Whiteside
Restricted (2): Thompson, Greene
Unrestricted (1): Williams

You're right that this could end up being a pretty boring summer. We've got arguably too many players locked up on a team that didn't do too well last year. We've got broke owners who really can't afford to amnesty a bad contract (which could be either Garcia/Salmons). And you've got a lot of young players that you don't want to give up on. Greene is probably a casualty. Williams is another possible casualty despite how well he played for us simply because of the numbers game. Too many guards! I really have no idea how the front office feels about Honeycutt - he sure didn't get much playing time even toward the end of the year, so he might be allowed to walk, but he comes very, very cheap so maybe not. Whiteside hasn't shown much yet, but with only two bigs under contract it would be hard to let him go.

But we're in a situation where if we bring back both of the cheap youngsters on team options (who play at positions we're thin at) and JT, that's 12 and our first-rounder makes 13. That's before considering T-Will and any possible free agents. So I almost think that we'll need to spend our second rounder on a stashable Euro prospect. Then, GP is going to have to work some magic. And it may take magic this year, given where we are.
Yep, I think you and I are on the same page. If the Kings want to make serious moves to improve the team, it likely have to come by way of a trade or trades. And if you look at who we have that other teams might desire, and who were willing to part with, only two players of value spring to mind. Thornton and Evans. Now in theory they play the same position, so again in theory, you could afford to part with one of them. Problem is, your parting with one of the top three players on your team, so you damm well better get a top 3 player in return.

Now there are ways around this situation, but would the Maloofs be willing to bite the financial bullet.
 

bajaden

Hall of Famer
#57
And keeping Greene is the best way to keep JT. I bet if Greene goes then most likely JT will go too. Greene only has a $2.5m QO. Not reason not to offer it and see if he gets any other offers.
The QO may only be 2.5 mil, but the cap hold is 6 mil. JT's cap hold is 9 mil. So until both guys contracts or lack thereof is decided, the two of them would tie up a huge chunk of our cap space. Greene isn't important enough to tie up 6 mil in capspace.

Note: Thompson played for Rider, which is in New Jersey. He's from the that area. So he's an east coast guy. Last time I looked, there's a team there called the Nets that has a lot of money to spend. I think he would have a hard time passing on a big offer from them. Of course we can show our love and match. But if the amount is too big, I think he's gone. I hope not!
 
Last edited:
#60
The QO may only be 2.5 mil, but the cap hold is 6 mil. JT's cap hold is 9 mil. So until both guys contracts or lack thereof is decided, the two of them would tie up a huge chunk of our cap space. Greene isn't important enough to tie up 6 mil in capspace.

Note: Thompson played for Rider, which is in New Jersey. He's from the that area. So he's an east coast guy. Last time I looked, there's a team there called the Nets that has a lot of money to spend. I think he would have a hard time passing on a big offer from them. Of course we can show our love and match. But if the amount is too big, I think he's gone. I hope not!
Are those the current cap holds? they were reduced alot in the new CBA.