One is also 16th in the league in turnovers per game, 7th if you use the per 48 minute stat, and it isn't the rook.
Wouldn't a more comparable look use the first year stats for both players, rather than the stats from 'Player A's' 4th season?
Player A-
8 min 3.2pts (.429, .000, .500) 1.6 rebs 0.5 ast .35 stl 0.1 blk .41TO
Player B-
6.4min 2.2pts (.450, .000, .810) 1.0rebs 0.2ast 0.1stl 0.1blk 0.8TO
Hmmm, now all the sudden those numbers look pretty similiar, well except for the shooting percentages.
I think Gerald, of course, has the edge in athleticism and the fact his body is more mature, however, I am going with Kevin because he has a more complete game, a nice looking shot and a dedication to put in the extra work. He always plays better against the best teams, as evidenced by his college career. I think he has a higher ceiling than Gerald. Will that happen? Who knows