On the one hand drafting Kevin Love would be iditioic and would prove once and for all that Geoff is more concerend with resurrecting his old college system than winnign a title in the NBA. No team who cannot defend the middle has ever, or will ever, win an NBA title and we would be turning ourselves into more gimmick than serious threat. It worked in the Webber years preceisely because Chris Webber was such a unique talent. A first rate atheltic PF who could also run the Princeton.
On the other hand drafting Kevin Love makes 100% sense (if he can cut it in the NBA). The reason being that it would finally resolve for us a major major issue -- our identity. It would be the first time since we missed the opportuntiy to define ourselves via Bonzi + Ron's bump and thump that we would have a roster start coming together around a single theme. It would be the rebirth of the Princeton. Love and Hawes int eh future, and if that was where you were going, you probably do keep Brad as well to complete the passing big man picture. Kevin of course the primary beneficiary ala Peja with cut after cut. But Cisco can also play that way. rRn wouold have to be liquidated because he does NOT play that way, and our defense would be horrific. But we would make sense. And not only make sense, but gain the other advantage of making snese -- we would know what we needs to add to try to make it work. Specifically a roleplaying unselfish mega-defender at SF, at elast one defensive PG, and a top shooting/pick and roll PG (in other words Doug, Mike, and Bobby of yesteryear). Then of course as Brad and Mikki phase out, a thuggish backup big (Pollard) to give us some presence. Knowing who you are, having an identity, makes things so much clearer than when you are just a collection of spare parts and different styles.
