KKSloga said:Vlade could be a nice addition to the team next year as an insurance policy. Lets face it, Brad gets hurt every year so it would be nice to have a guy be able to come out and put in 20 minutes a game when Brad is out and run this offense because he still knows it better then anyone else on the Kings current roster. Vlade is the best passing point gaurd this team has ever had!!
Diehard Jim said:it is not about age with vlade, it is the fact vlade is one of the nicest guys in basketball
Bricklayer said:When you're being asked to keep up with Amare Stoudamire, being nice doesn't help much.
bozzwell said:It's really easy to fall in love with the idea of bringing Vlade back now that Brad is out and RA can't/won't use Tag. As 11th/12th man on veteran's minimum or something along those lines. I still say, do it only and only as an assistant coach first. We shouldn't pay people 1mil+ a year just because they are well liked around here and have history with the team. We can spend that money on the next GP discovery/diamond in the rough type of player (even though the risk is greater).
So, if Vlade wants to come and work with our bigs and earn that veteran's minum that way, while still registered player I say it is worthy experiment for a year. If he gets to play - that means we're really in trouble again.
But he really needs to want it badly and bring it as an assistant, and that is really for Vlade, RA and GP to figure out.
Warhawk said:I know it was mentioned / discussed before, but I was just watching a bit of the Laker game and the commentators mentioned that the Lakers probably won't pick up Vlade's contract extension for next year and he has expressed interest in playing one more year, preferably with the Kings.
If he would sign for the veteran's minimum, would anyone like to see him return as a 3rd string C / (un)official assistant coach to the younger guys? The Tag thing doesn't seem to be working out with RA and passing big men are hard to find. I think for minimal $$$ he could be an asset to have on the bench for situations such as that we are in right now....
Any thoughts?
Warhawk said:Actually, it would be funny if he did return and help coach in that capacity - the Lakers would actually be financially susidizing the Kings' coaching....
Kinda be a last laugh at the Lakers, wouldn't it?![]()
Warhawk said:I know it was mentioned / discussed before, but I was just watching a bit of the Laker game and the commentators mentioned that the Lakers probably won't pick up Vlade's contract extension for next year and he has expressed interest in playing one more year, preferably with the Kings.
If he would sign for the veteran's minimum, would anyone like to see him return as a 3rd string C / (un)official assistant coach to the younger guys? The Tag thing doesn't seem to be working out with RA and passing big men are hard to find. I think for minimal $$$ he could be an asset to have on the bench for situations such as that we are in right now....
Any thoughts?
Gargamel said:The Lakers don't have the option not to re-sign him. It's Vlade's option. Most likely, he'll be traded as an expiring K this offseason (or I'll go to bed in a sleeping bag full of tarantulas and harvestmen). Then, the new team buys him out at $2 mill and they save $3 mill off of their cap. Then, he becomes a free agent.
BullKing said:There is a post about this thread on one of the lakers boards. Asides from the usual Kings bashings.....there was one reply that i agree with: "king's fans think with their hearts not their minds." for most parts i would have to agree with this assesment. This thread is an excelent example.
bozzwell said:Ain't that a beautiful thing. Even in Lakers uni, Vlade is still a King and giving LAL royal rogering.
Sweet.
Really be carefull about what you say there are some bets you just do not want to risk looseing and some experikences that I would not wish on any one including a Laker fan.Gargamel said:The Lakers don't have the option not to re-sign him. It's Vlade's option. Most likely, he'll be traded as an expiring K this offseason (or I'll go to bed in a sleeping bag full of tarantulas and harvestmen). Then, the new team buys him out at $2 mill and they save $3 mill off of their cap. Then, he becomes a free agent.
HndsmCelt said:Really be carefull about what you say there are some bets you just do not want to risk looseing and some experikences that I would not wish on any one including a Laker fan.
BullKing said:This is a ridiculous thread. Some of you have a hard time realizing that Vlade is done as a player. We don't need Vlade, I can't see how he could help us???
There is a post about this thread on one of the lakers boards. Asides from the usual Kings bashings.....there was one reply that i agree with: "king's fans think with their hearts not their minds." for most parts i would have to agree with this assesment. This thread is an excelent example.
Vlade is done, let it go people...
Gargamel said:Not so fast. The only way he harms LA is if they don't trade him. He doesn't have a no-trade clause. However, he'll get paid regardless of the path LA takes. When they trade him and he's cut, he is then free to sign with Sac if he wants. Think of Vlade as a walking, wheezing $3 million rebate.
PS: If I am forced to spend a night in a sleeping bag full of tarantulas, I can make a call to scottstarantulas as advertised atop the page I'm viewing right now. What the heck is that?! I thought the Laker ticket ads were strange enough.![]()