I still think Thornton would be better suited as our 6th man, and Brooks starting but I'm probably in the minority.
I would prefer Brooks and Fredette to get a combined 10-15 minutes of action (most of it going to Brooks).
Thomas (27 min)/Evans (11 min)/Brooks (7 min)/Fredette (3 min)
Evans (20 min)/Thornton (28 min)
Johnson (28 min)/Outlaw (14 min)/Evans (6 min)
(Evans = 37 min total)
By limiting Brooks and Fredette's minutes, it would only force us to play Evans at SF for 6 min a game. If we give Brooks 15-18 min a game...
Thomas (27 min)/Brooks (18 min)/Fredette (3 min)
Evans (20 min)/Thornton (28 min)
Johnson (28 min)/Evans (17 min)/Outlaw (3 min)
(Evans = 37 min total)
We force Evans to play almost half his minutes at a position that makes him a weaker player.
The major problem right now is our sixth man plays the same position as one of our star players. You don't see this on other teams. It would be the same situation if Thornton had a sixth man role on the Lakers. Kobe starts, but when Thornton comes in, who is going to play where? Can Thornton play PG? Nope. Can Thornton play SF? Nope. Sorry Kobe looks like we are going to have to play you at PG or SF considering you are more versatile.
Everyone complains about Evans being played out of position, but it isn't a coaching or rotation problem. It is a roster problem which falls on Petrie.