Well to tell you the truth Smills, I can't find a player that might be available that I can't find some fault with. With me, the question isn't Iggy as much as it is his salary and length of contract. And if he can stay healthy, which you've aluded to, then I can swallow the contract. Everyone knows his outside shot is inconsistent. Thats something you have to live with.
Height wise, he is a little undersized for the SF position, but he is, for all intents and purposes 6'7", unless you want to quibble over a quarter of an inch. He also has a 6'11" wingspan and a standing reach of other SF's that are 6'8" and 6'9". When you add in his athleticism, it more than makes up for any height disparity. Until this last season he's been very durable playing all 82 games in every season but one.
Is he perfect? No! But he's a very good defender and a good rebounder for his position. He'll get you between 12 to 15 points on a nightly basis without affecting the offense, and he can play two positions if needed. As I said, my only problem is that he's overpaid.
Those are quite a bit of faults. And the $ level is just exasperating. I mean he'll likely be owed 1/4 of the available cap room when all is said and done. That's a big deal. I mean is it worth pulling the trigger now? Maybe(I do like him as a player overall), but then you lose the opportunity cost of say, Danny Granger becomes available next year due to paul george's progression. Things like that. Do we want to cut into our maneuverability flexibility now for a player that's actually quite redundant to what Tyreke brings us? I'm not saying yes or no, just phrasing these questions. This isn't a Mitch for C-Webb deal where the only question was, Will he show up? There's a lot of variables to sort through here. I'm 100% on the fence with this one.