Well, I had to sit and let all that information percolate and simmer for a while before commenting. First the positives. PDA showed up and answered questions. I use the word "answered" loosely. And as a result of those answers, how much more do I know now, that I didn't know before? Well, I know that PDA has a future in politics if he chooses. But I digress. In one regard, this was a lose/lose for PDA regardless of what he said. I say that because I knew going in that he was limited in what he could say. You can't really talk about Karl being in your future, while at the same time saying that you hope Corbin, who in reality isn't in your future, being the possible coach of the future. Are you following me here? What the fans want to hear, and I know that PDA is aware of this, is that we want Karl as the future coach of the team. He may well be, but PDA can't say that.
Make no mistake, I'm not trying to paint PDA in a positive light. Quite the contrary. I don't know a dammed thing now that I didn't know before this debacle. I won't belabor you with going through the entire interview piece by piece because most of it was smoke and mirrors. But if we just concentrate on why Malone was fired, which prompted all this, I think we can get to the heart of the matter. The truth probably is, that PDA and Malone didn't agree on much of anything. PDA said that they were unhappy with the Kings running mostly isolation plays with Cousins and Gay. OK, but excuse me, wasn't it PDA that just resigned Gay to a new contract, while knowing that what Gay excels in is isolation. That's who he is! That's what he's good at. Isn't it PDA that just resigned Cousins to a long term contract while knowing that Cousins is a low post player that excels in isolation play. So you give a coach a team where his two best players are isolation players, and then fire him for using them to the best of their abilities.
Now I'm not saying that you couldn't alter what they do to some degree to get others involved. Especially Cousins who I think is open to anything as long as it results in a win. But for that to happen, you need to put the right pieces around them. And in the interview, PDA admits that our bench leaves much to be desired. As they say, you can't make a silk purse out of a cows ear. I have no idea what the hell that means! PDA said, that while Malone went 2 and 7 without Cousins, he sort of implied that Malone deserved some slack because Cousins was out. But he also implied that a better coach could have/would have won more games during that span with Rudy and company. Which factored in to the decision to fire Malone. An abstract argument at best. Or as Rainmaker likes to say, a straw dog argument. No way to prove or disprove it.
He also said that he liked the way our summer league team was playing, and expected that to continue into the season. Really? Now I grant you, that watching our summer league team play this year was fun. But there are so many variables in the competition that its impossible to project much of anything other than maybe, how individuals play. I mean come on, Stauskas looked like a veteran NBA player in summer league. He looked better than McLemore. But once the real season began, reality set in. Because something works in summer league, doesn't mean it will work during the real season. You get ten fouls for gods sake. OK, I get it. PDA has a vision for the team, and Malone had a different one. And that folks is at the heart of this entire matter. You know whose fault that is? Vivek's!
There is a reason that owners hire their GM's first. As an owner, hopefully you have a vision of how you want your team to play. And with that in mind you would then hire a GM that has that same vision. With that established as the vision of the future, the plan of the future, the GM would then go out and find a coach with credentials that shares that same vision. In other words, everyone from the top to the bottom is on the same page. Buts that's not what happened. Vivek went and hired Malone. I don't know his reasons and I won't speculate. He then hired PDA. So now you have a coach with one vision and a GM with a different vision. The question at that point was, how long before push came to shove. The result was going to be the same, it was just a matter of when. In this case, the timing couldn't have been worse, and I lay that directly at the feet of PDA.
It's really that simple. PDA and Malone were never on the same page from the beginning. And that's not PDA's fault, nor Malone's fault. That's Vivek's fault. At the time it happened (Malone's hiring), it was mentioned as unusual, and not normally done. Then it was swept under the rug and forgotten. But it was there festering, and eating away at PDA. He saw Malone as an obstacle to what he wanted to accomplish. And remember folks, this was PDA's first gig in the bigtime. This was his chance to put his imprint on the team, and the NBA. And he wasn't going to let Malone get in the way of that. This happens all the time in the NBA for the same reasons. It's just done better. From a PR point of view, when your trying to sell tickets, and that's the view that counts, it was clumsy and incompetent. Enough to get PDA fired? Probably not. But from this point on, all eye's will be on him, and all mistakes will be magnified. It's known as shooting yourself in the foot. There's nothing worse than a self inflicted injury.