Amare is averaging 21, 8.1, and 1 block this year (his 7th) in 37 minutes. With Steve Nash dishing out assists. For $15.1 mil. He also has 2.9 TO and 2.0 assists. He is 26.
JT is averaging 10.4, 6.8, and 0.5 in his rookie year in 26 minutes under two head coaches and Beno as the PG. For $1.9 mil. And after hitting a rookie wall for a bit has been improving his play. He also has 1.8 TO and 1.0 assist. He is 22.
I have a hard time giving up that quickly on JT. Am I saying he is or will ever be Amare? Heck no. But I also don't think he will command a max contract, either. I would strongly consider saving the $$$ for a top-notch PG or C. Having a couple good #2 and #3 guys is also improtant (JT, Martin, etc.).
Like some others here, I think he would be a nice piece to get, but at what cost in both salary or loss of picks or good young guys? Expirings, etc., I have no problem with, obviously. But giving up JT and our pick and more just rubs me as giving away too much for the salary cap hole we will likely be in, especially if he gets another max contract in 1.5 years. Or bolts. I have a hard time gutting our team for that.
Maybe getting him and planning on packaging him up as an expiring next year to get another big name? That is also a strategy that might work well.
I really waver back and forth on this one.....having a hard time with it......
But I also don't see it happening anyways, as the Maloofs are looking to trip the old guys without adding salary.
The whole bird rights thing is about giving the team that has the player the best chance at resigning them. It benefits the team, and it benefits the player.Oh ok. Thanks. I was unaware that bird rights could be traded. Doesn't really make much sense to me as to why they can be, but can't argue against the system I guess.
Read this on ESPN this morning.....
The team most capable of satisfying the Suns' desires -- with a combination of cap relief, young talent and a good draft pick -- might actually be Sacramento.
For two reasons:
1. Grizzlies owner Michael Heisley has held firm to his recent pronouncement that the Suns aren't getting the player they lust for: Memphis swingman Rudy Gay.
2. The Kings could move to the top of the list if they were willing to part with rookie forward Jason Thompson, their two biggest expiring contracts (Bobby Jackson and Shelden Williams) and what will almost certainly be a top-five pick in June.
But the Kings aren't willing. Not to part with all that. Not yet, anyway.
Although it has talked with the Suns, Sacramento appears more focused on trying to move center Brad Miller before contemplating anything else, while also continuing to field proposals for in-demand swingman John Salmons.
"We looked at it," Kings co-owner Joe Maloof told ESPN.com when asked about Stoudemire. "Never say never, but right now, no."
Not sure I'd be willing to part with JT and our first round pick for Amare.
JT is averaging 10/9. Amare was averaging 13/9 when he was 18. He was averaging like 25/9 when he was JTs current age. You can't even really compare the two.
I like JT. I like Kmart a lot as well.
But, I like to see the Kings win a lot more.
JT is averaging 10/9. Amare was averaging 13/9 when he was 18. He was averaging like 25/9 when he was JTs current age. You can't even really compare the two.
I like JT. I like Kmart a lot as well.
But, I like to see the Kings win a lot more.
Yeah and when you watch Amare get that 25 you realize it has a lot to do with his PG, the pick and roll, and dunks. At least Thompson shows somewhat of a post game.
The thing about spending our assets now on Amare is that we forego other possibilities in the near future. It's an opportunity cost thing. And personally I don't see Amare as some "Savior" to a franchise type player. He's a lesser player than C-Webb was. He shouldn't even be compared to that. It's ridiculous.
Say no to Amare, so that way we have the pieces to continue a proper rebuild.
while you were crunching the numbers did you bother to see average min per game and shot attempts. You have noted that JT could possibly rebound as well. Did you notice attempts for each player? Jason averages 8 Amare averaged 10 his rookie season. And when he was JT's age he averaged 17 shots a game to get that 25pts. Now with JT averaging 8 shots and 10 pts do you think it may be feasible that with another 9 shots he would be around the same number definatley over 20.
I really don't like PPG comparisons when 1 player takes twice as many shots as the other. I mean Kenny Thomas would probably average 30pts a game if he shot the ball 40 times and he would have 12 rebounds if he played 40 min. Does that make him better than Amare or JT??
Basically Amare is averaging 21pts 8reb in 37 min. Now take 11 min away from him and 7 less shots and he is averaging 12pts 6reb. What does this matter you asd? that is the same min and same shot attempts JT gets.
Jason averages 10pts 7reb in 26min. now figure it out giving Jason 7 more shots at his current 50% and another 2 trips to the foul line at 70% thats exactly 10 more pts and he averages 1reb every 3 1/2 min and give him the extra 11 min that Amare has thats eaxtly 3 more reb. Giving you this
Jason Thompson with the same shot attempts and min played as Amare Stoudemire would give you 20pts 10reb on averge vs. Amare 21pts 8reb.
Yeah and when you watch Amare get that 25 you realize it has a lot to do with his PG, the pick and roll, and dunks. At least Thompson shows somewhat of a post game.
And JT is 4 years older than Amre when he entered the league. JT's doesn't have a great deal of improvement left in him. He will peak by 26. Amare is already in his prime and alredy miles better than JT ever will be.while you were crunching the numbers did you bother to see average min per game and shot attempts. You have noted that JT could possibly rebound as well. Did you notice attempts for each player? Jason averages 8 Amare averaged 10 his rookie season. And when he was JT's age he averaged 17 shots a game to get that 25pts. Now with JT averaging 8 shots and 10 pts do you think it may be feasible that with another 9 shots he would be around the same number definatley over 20.
I really don't like PPG comparisons when 1 player takes twice as many shots as the other. I mean Kenny Thomas would probably average 30pts a game if he shot the ball 40 times and he would have 12 rebounds if he played 40 min. Does that make him better than Amare or JT??
Basically Amare is averaging 21pts 8reb in 37 min. Now take 11 min away from him and 7 less shots and he is averaging 12pts 6reb. What does this matter you asd? that is the same min and same shot attempts JT gets.
Jason averages 10pts 7reb in 26min. now figure it out giving Jason 7 more shots at his current 50% and another 2 trips to the foul line at 70% thats exactly 10 more pts and he averages 1reb every 3 1/2 min and give him the extra 11 min that Amare has thats eaxtly 3 more reb. Giving you this
Jason Thompson with the same shot attempts and min played as Amare Stoudemire would give you 20pts 10reb on averge vs. Amare 21pts 8reb.
pure fallacy. shoulda woulda coulda. more minutes=more tiring on your body and more attention from defenders=less efficient productivity. arguing based on per48 stats makes no sense because it ignores the reality of what happens when you play 5 more minutes per game over teh course of 82 games against the best basketball players in the world.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=3912108
Well, as I suspected, all of our debating is probably all for not. Too bad for us.
Are you ****ing kidding me??? Yeah because JT is awful shape and playing another 10 min he would be worthless.
Jason has played in 7 games where he did get over 35 min and got a double double in all but 2 of them and 1 of them was 9reb. In those same games he had 2 games over 20pts and 1 at 19 the rest except for 1 was over 15pts all and only attempted over 10 shots in 1 of those 7 games.
Not if it means us getting the bad end of the deal...if there's a trade out there for us to make that makes sense, do it...if not, I'm all for saving money for after next season.Then I guess, the Kings will not make any trade. <sigh>
2010 is a different offseason than most because so many teams are going to have enough space for max contracts.
And JT is 4 years older than Amre when he entered the league. JT's doesn't have a great deal of improvement left in him. He will peak by 26. Amare is already in his prime and alredy miles better than JT ever will be.
I love JT but the problem with our fans is that they are overly unrealistic in their assesment of our young players. Peja, Martin and now JT have all been placed under the same umbrella. They are good player but not MAX type players. JT will be good by he won't be a perennial All-Star like Amare is.
And people keep mentioning that Amare has played with Nash. True, but Amare is a finisher. I can mount an argument that a lot of Nash's assist numbers in Phoenix are due to Amare being a strong finisher. Would his assist numbers be as great if he was throwing it to Miller, KT, Mikki or JT?!
Its a two way argument.
Fact is, in 2010 we would be absolutly over the moon if we could sign Amare! No ONE can deny that. It would be the biggest FA signing in franchise's Sacramento history. Players like Amare don't become available too often. Here, we are presented with a chance to get our player BEFORE 2010. We have minimal chance of getting a MAX type player in 2010. Those players never leaver their teams via FA.
Also, getting Amare, pairing him with Martin, automatically becomes a very attractive option for other players. If you were a free agent, what would be more of an attactive offer to you, a team with Amare and Martin or a team with only Martin as a legit NBA player?!
Considering what is being offered for Amare out there, he is being shopped cheaply. We can get him for less than he is worth. If you can get Amare for a bunch of expirings (that we have no plans to re-sign), a good young player and a first round pick (Houstons), you do it in a second.
Getting Amare, keeping Martin and keeping your lottery pick? Thats some very good foundation to build from. You have a direction. Not to mention that you would still have some good players in Hawes and Garcia to surround these guys with.
Amare is certainly going to be a good scorer even without a great PG, but I'd expect his FG% to drop with more focus on him creating his own ofense, that's not really that big of a deal though. He'll find his scoring opportunities though without being that great of a creator. The problem is though that if we trade our rebuilding pieces for Amare then we're basically saying that this is our guy because we're going to take ourselves out of the top pick range, so unless we luck out in the draft we aren't going to get all-star type player there. Something else we do is we put ourselves in a position where we have to go find a center who can play very good post D (and no I'm not just talking about Thabeet's one defensive skill of shot blocking unless you just want to be the denver nuggets) and plus rebounding.
The clock will start and we'd have to find a way to surround him with players that will make us contenders or there would be no point in trading for him, trading for him because we're tired of being cellar dwellers is a stupid reason that will get us nowhere. Amare is not a franchise player, he is not going to be a championship level shot creator or defender. He's a second fiddle guy, a very good 2nd fiddle, but a 2nd fiddle nonetheless. He'll be 27 by next year and he has a history of serious knee injuries, he's extremely athletic yes but once he starts slowing down even a bit his ofensive game is going to take a bit hit because he only has his jumper to fall back on. He doesn't have the strength, post skills, passing skills, or ball handling skills to still remain remotely effective. He's not a guy who is a long term prize despite being 27 by next year.
A 26 yr old who along with one of the most dominant centers in basketball and 2 other all-stars can't even make it into the Western Finals. So, what is he going to do for the Kings, when they have no bench, one premier shooter, and a bunch of role players. The answer is nothing. And, for that spactacular improvement your willing to pay him $20M & give up 2 high draft picks. Thanks, but no thanks.This is ridiculous. The ENTIRE POINT of a rebuild is to end up with a player like Amare Stoudemire. It doesn't mean the rebuild would be over, but suddenly you have a 26 year old nucleus of Kevin Martin and Amare Stoudemire. Suddenly the team is going somewhere rather than just descending into crapitude.