Let's Decide on THE Big.

SacKings4Life21 said:
You see a championship with that starting line up? I am not turning it downb, i just am skeptical. I suppose if Ty Chan was literaly a lane clogger and a 10-13 rbs a night guy. then he would be very helpful. But what team has won without a go to guy in the post? the bulls had grant and rodman who could score when needed. Ty Chan can score lol

Woah... I didn't know he was Asian! I really like him now...
 
playmaker0017 said:
Artest can play in the post - and he's good - but he's not a real threat down there.

Yeah he is. He can go 1 on 1 with most SFs/SGs down there because he's simply bigger than they are. He's definately a threat down there.
 
playmaker0017 said:
Artest can play in the post - and he's good - but he's not a real threat down there.
You are right. That must be why the Lakers constantly double and triple teamed him when he was in the post.
 
i would love to see nate as our back up pg as well... And i want to belive that Chandler could be the answer... he is a defensive stalwart but whatavout the fact he is injury prone
 
Wee bit premature. Untill March Madness is in full swing it is hard to ake a great guess about the potential impact the top college palyers will have (and even then it's still a crap shoot). More importatnly if you really want to have a serious and meaningfull take on the likely candidates it would be practical to wait untill we had a better idea of where the Kings pick may fall. Now if we just want to engage in idle speculation I think Batman would kick Superman's *** in Jeporday any day of the week!
 
Yeah he is. He can go 1 on 1 with most SFs/SGs down there because he's simply bigger than they are. He's definately a threat down there.

He's a threat to score - but not consistantly. He can and is shut down.

I know everyone here has crowned him the offensive genius --- but he's just not. He's a good player that can score some in the post. Not enough to be your only post threat, that's for sure.

thesanityannex said:
You are right. That must be why the Lakers constantly double and triple teamed him when he was in the post.

Well, the Lakers doubled and tripled EVERYONE in the post. Not just Artest.

But, it could have been that he was turning it over and shooting a terrible percentage and still jacking it up. I'd do the same thing.

Again, I know he's the best offensive force since Wilt Chamberlain and MJ were cloned into Milt Jorderlain ... but he's shooting a whopping 37% for us and barfing up shots.
 
see... artest cannot be our only post presence. WE must have a banger. A banger with a defensive stalwart mentality is impossible ot get. Unless KG loves artest so much he wants to come to sac lol... come on people lets put out thoughts together... who will reshape our franchise downlow...
 
playmaker0017 said:
.

Again, I know he's the best offensive force since Wilt Chamberlain and MJ were cloned into Milt Jorderlain ... but he's shooting a whopping 37% for us and barfing up shots.
Don't you mean Shamilt Jordanlain-Rahim???:rolleyes:


All I said was he was a great post player. Never compared him to Jordan/Chamberlain. Him "barfing up shots" has nothing to do with his post game. Quite the opposite. In fact, I'd like to see more of his post game as he seems to want to hang around the perimeter lately.
 
thesanityannex said:
Don't you mean Shamilt Jordanlain-Rahim???:rolleyes:

Well, that wouldn't even be fair to do.

All I said was he was a great post player. Never compared him to Jordan/Chamberlain.

It wasn't necessarily directed at you. There is a lot of sentiment that Artest could carry this team offensively and I'm just bucking at it.

Him "barfing up shots" has nothing to do with his post game. Quite the opposite. In fact, I'd like to see more of his post game as he seems to want to hang around the perimeter lately.

Except that he barfs them up in the post too.
 
Kings113 said:
And block shots. He's been rebounding and blocking real well since late January.

I say keep Brad (offense, he and Ron)... but go after one of Eddie Griffin/Tony Battie/Melvin Ely/Dan Gadzuric. Don't know about landing Pryzbilla... he'd be the guy I want most though.
Chandler is a younger, taller version of Dennis Rodman, IMO. Could he fit into our system? I guess that all depends on what direction our 'system' takes in the near future.
 
SacKings4Life21 said:
see... artest cannot be our only post presence. WE must have a banger. A banger with a defensive stalwart mentality is impossible ot get. Unless KG loves artest so much he wants to come to sac lol... come on people lets put out thoughts together... who will reshape our franchise downlow...


KG would be great, but he really isn't the player you just described. He is more "Dirk" than he is "Shaq".
 
Kings113 said:
Along with like every other team too, a bunch of times.

Yes, and it's led to turnovers and missed shots for the most part.

Doubling isn't always about being "worried" about a player. It also has a lot to do with knowing their response to pressure. Artest cannot see over a double and has a hard time passing out of it. So, doubling him is easy and often leads to a dumb play on his part.

Plus, it's also VERY easy to double a post player when there isn't another post threat ... which there isn't.

If you look back, Reef was getting doubled pretty hard too earlier in the year.

It's not that Artest CAN'T score or isn't good, but he's not a guy you can ride in the post. Artest thrived in Indy because they spread the floor well and they had an alternative post player.
 
Why is it that every time I see the Spurs play I'm impressed by Naz Mohammed? Yes, I know, he plays with Duncan and Duncan commands a lot of attention but if we were to obtain him (he's a FA this year) he'd be playing next to Brad whose game is simialar to Duncans in that he plays away from the basket, face up and not back to. I know SA will want to keep him because he beat Rasho out for PT but they have a lot of guys to pay to keep happy there and were good even with Rasho in the lineup so we could pry him away if we wished to expend the resources. What do guys think of him?
 
Duncan doesnt play away from the basket... he is a dominate post player, who can take it outside. He can do everything but he plays inside. I have never been to impressed with him... He is a pure C, when we need a defensive PF, u couldnt play Naz with BRad. THat is no athlteisicm on the court
 
I wouldn't mind getting Nazr. But I'd have others ahead of him to go after.

Bet he's signed by Bulls/Hawks/Spurs anyways.
 
SacKings4Life21 said:
Duncan doesnt play away from the basket... he is a dominate post player, who can take it outside. He can do everything but he plays inside. I have never been to impressed with him... He is a pure C, when we need a defensive PF, u couldnt play Naz with BRad. THat is no athlteisicm on the court

Re-read my post and you're right...Duncan doesn't play away from the basket strictly. I do recognize that he is also a strong inside presence when he chooses or when following his or a teammates shot for an offensive board or putback. But he also spends a lot of time 12-15 ft. (usually) left of the basket where his patented off the glass jumper is unequalled in the league, hoping to draw his man out of the key to open things up for himself and others...just like Brad does from all angles to the basket. I really don't think Tim's the Shaq type who lives down low...he usually starts from outside.
 
Kings113 said:
I wouldn't mind getting Nazr. But I'd have others ahead of him to go after.

Bet he's signed by Bulls/Hawks/Spurs anyways.

So you would consider him more of a complimentry type player who wouldn't be that outstanding with lesser frontline help?
 
Rowdyone said:
So you would consider him more of a complimentry type player who wouldn't be that outstanding with lesser frontline help?

Getting a dominant PF isn't easy. That is probably the hardest position in the NBA. We need to make a splash here with a dominant force and Brad and others can compliment his game. I'd at least like to see a good PF/C backup coming off the bench like what SAR is doing for us now.

We really have to decide what we are going to do going forward in the offseason with the KT/SAR situation at PF, but for right now KT is doing a good job in there as is SAR coming off the bench. We have such a small bench as it is...it's nice to see production from Cisco and SAR off the bench. Hopefully KMart can further contribute like I know he can when he starts at Arco.
 
Rowdyone said:
So you would consider him more of a complimentry type player who wouldn't be that outstanding with lesser frontline help?

I guess. He's not much of a shot-blocker, not that athletic, older, but is a really good rebounder, has size, and is decent offensively.
 
Last edited:
What are the chances of landing Samuel Dalembert in the off season? The guy is a monster rebounder and shot blocker with an improving offensive game.
 
KingKong said:
What are the chances of landing Samuel Dalembert in the off season? The guy is a monster rebounder and shot blocker with an improving offensive game.

I think this year's free agent crop is pretty good and we need to go after someone if not get someone in the draft. Face it, we are playing good now and will be in the playoffs, we need to put that lottery pick behind us, we are so good that our pick will be too late ;)

I like Sam from what I've seen of him when the Kings played the 76ers. While this is a very valuable position (PF/C).
He's a nice young prospect that I think will be getting better and better. Does he play PF/C? That's a guy we really need to try and find, not so much a big slow 7'+ guy, but 1 around 6' 9" that is very athletic and can play both PF/C. While you don't need to be the biggest guy to get the rebounds (KT), we need someone with quick feet and a big body that makes his presence know and will make opponents think twice about getting to our basket.

I'm really liked what I saw from Anderson Varejao in the Kings/Cavs game. At 6' 10" he is a very athletic guy that could play PF/C.
Position: F
Born: Sep 28, 1982
Height: 6-10 / 2,08
Weight: 240 lbs. / 108,9 kg.
From : Brazil

He's making around $900K this year and next, then he's a free agent. How much would it take to get him. While I like to think of the draft, who knows what pick we will get and I'd like to go after a somewhat known player that is emerging and maybe on the wrong team to fully mature. That's why Darko could have been good for us if we could have gotten him fairly cheaply.
 
Last edited:
KingKong said:
What are the chances of landing Samuel Dalembert in the off season? The guy is a monster rebounder and shot blocker with an improving offensive game.

I'd love it, but if Rick Adelman is the coach, no way. That guy would give Adelman a heart attack with his stone hands. Just too bad he is exactly the kind of player we need.
 
Back
Top