[Game] Kings v. Blazers 11/09/13

I'm sorry, but this is the first game where I really have a problem with the way Malone is coaching it. Idiot smallballer crap. We get crushed. So he goes back to it. We get crushed again. Who's that on?
 
It's hard to do anything with shooters when you have Isaiah "2nd coming of Michael Jordon" Thomas continuously pounding the ball on offense. This roster sucks. Again, nothing new but there's a lot of work ahead to get this thing fixed.
 
I don't know how you know that. I don't know that. We've never seen Isaiah Thomas play when the team is structured around him being the secondary scoring option. I happen to think that there are enough shots to go around in one starting session of minutes for both players, especially when you consider the fact that they play completely different positions.

Most middling teams have an IT in the starting lineup. Monta Ellis, Rudy Gay, Brandon Jennings, etc. Again, you don't win a championship featuring those guys, but they bring you to a certain spot in the standings, then you trade them or move them to their intended role once you are contending. You have to walk before you can run, or however that saying goes.

I can't stress it enough how not 'ideal' this whole team is. The pieces don't fit, but we owe it to this city, to DeMarcus Cousins, to the new ownership to TRY and win as many games as we can. Or at least I thought that was the plan. I think starting Isaiah Thomas gives us a better chance to win games, period. It has its pro's and con's, but I think the pro's outweigh the con's. That's my take in a nutshell.

But we know how each other feels about this whole situation at this point.

We have to work right now with what we have. What we have is IT as the second option who, when he's in traffic for a contested shot, all too often doesn't look for the open man. I'm not saying he's horrible or anything, I'm just saying that's the main problem I have with his game and attitude right now. Yes, he should definitely be taking value shots but he should be looking for Ben or Jimmer or whomever when he doesn't have that shot.
 
I don't know how you know that. I don't know that. We've never seen Isaiah Thomas play when the team is structured around him being the secondary scoring option. I happen to think that there are enough shots to go around in one starting session of minutes for both players, especially when you consider the fact that they play completely different positions.

Most middling teams have an IT in the starting lineup. Monta Ellis, Rudy Gay, Brandon Jennings, etc. Again, you don't win a championship featuring those guys, but they bring you to a certain spot in the standings, then you trade them or move them to their intended role once you are contending. You have to walk before you can run, or however that saying goes.

I can't stress it enough how not 'ideal' this whole team is. The pieces don't fit, but we owe it to this city, to DeMarcus Cousins, to the new ownership to TRY and win as many games as we can. Or at least I thought that was the plan. I think starting Isaiah Thomas gives us a better chance to win games, period. It has its pro's and con's, but I think the pro's outweigh the con's. That's my take in a nutshell.

But we know how each other feels about this whole situation at this point.

First bolded point: IT isn't as good as those guys.

Second bold: What good does gunning and trying to win a few more games do for us? Let's us get worse odds in the lottery? Makes us worse in the future? I think you are in the minority with wanting to win more games while playing a style that isn't going to get us anywhere. Most people would much rather try and build for the future.
 
Portland is closing in on 2x as many rebounds as us. Cousins has 10, no one else has more than 3.

JT - 7pts, 3 REB (11 mins)
PP - 6pts, 2 REB (27 min) TWENTY SEVEN
 
First bolded point: IT isn't as good as those guys.

Second bold: What good does gunning and trying to win a few more games for us? Let's us get worse odds in the lottery? Makes us worse in the future? I think you are in the minority with wanting to win more games while playing a style that isn't going to get us anywhere. Most people would much rather try and build for the future.

The other problem is that with the exception of Jennings, none of those guys are pg's which mean they usually have to get the ball in order to ball hog it, which gives whoever is running the point the option to pass to others. When IT goes into hero mode, he has all the control. He's extremely efficient and really good at what he does but his style isn't best suited for a major minute starting pg.
 
Ben is already the 2nd best player on this team. and he contributes more on defense than Thornton/Salmons/Patterson combined. crashing the boards, going for blocks, getting his hands on passes.
 
The other problem is that with the exception of Jennings, none of those guys are pg's which mean they usually have to get the ball in order to ball hog it, which gives whoever is running the point the option to pass to others. When IT goes into hero mode, he has all the control. He's extremely efficient and really good at what he does but his style isn't best suited for a major minute starting pg.

Agreed. The comparison to those guys in both skill and utility is pretty out there.
 
The other problem is that with the exception of Jennings, none of those guys are pg's which mean they usually have to get the ball in order to ball hog it, which gives whoever is running the point the option to pass to others. When IT goes into hero mode, he has all the control. He's extremely efficient and really good at what he does but his style isn't best suited for a major minute starting pg.

548px-MightyMouse.jpg


Here I come to save the day!!!!
 
Back
Top