[Game] 55/82: Kings @ Pelicans 13 FEB 2025, 5:00pm PT/8:00pm ET

Keon and LaRavia are being grossly under utilized I don't think you can play Monk, Lavine, DDR at the same time two of them is good with either Keegan/Jake/Keon as the other two and Sabonis or Val @C.

Either DDR or Monk have to go be the 6th man

Nice to see Matkovic get some run he was basically in the shadow of two other big prospects in Mega and really worked his way through the ABA and Eurocup he could eventually be a nice back up at a prime Daniel Thiess level or maybe fall out back to playing in Europe depending on a number of factors.
 
Last edited:
A couple things bother me about this game:

1. The refs make huge a mistake down the stretch. I bet you the 2 minute report will show that DeRozen were being fouled while attacking the basket and should have been giving two free throws.
2. Team overall defense is not sustainable. As I said before, NOT ONE SINGLE GUY on the starting lineup can play great D. I think Keegan is only slightly above average but at time still soft.
3. Christie need to find a balance lineup of mixed and match of offense and defense...you can't have a bunch of great offensive players out there that couldn't guard anybody. That's why Malik come off the bench if you have great defensive player in FOX. But if you insert him into the starting lineup, it make the overall team defense weaker. Not to mention other guys that don't play D like DeRozen and Lavine.
4. I think it's tough on Christie because he can't pull DeRozen or Lavine from the lineup in favor of better defender since he doesn't want to upset them. And at the same time, he needs scorers. He can't put Ellis in there at time because he may need length to rebound? But tonight, he should bet on Ellis, not Keegan. Keegan isn't that great chasing guys around. He let Klay scored a wide open 3 the other night due to his slowness.
5. I talk about how DeRozen is a horrible defender....so is Zack Lavine. Holly crap, his inability to keep guys in front of him and also taking bad angle is terrible.
This team is a stuck in the playin team.
 
The spammimg iso, no player movement, no ball movement is horrible to watch and a far fall from the beautiful polar opposite of the past (Christie-era) Kings.

Tom Christie Thibodeau needs to trust the bench far more.
 
Keon and LaRavia are being grossly under utilized I don't think you can play Monk, Lavine, DDR at the same time two of them is good with either Keegan/Jake/Keon as the other two and Sabonis or Val @C.

Either DDR or Monk have to go be the 6th man

Nice to see Matkovic get some run he was basically in the shadow of two other big prospects in Mega and really worked his way through the ABA and Eurocup he could eventually be a nice back up at a prime Daniel Thiess level or maybe fall out back to playing in Europe depending on a number of factors.
Matkovic another Bosnian Croat in the NBA that’s playing for Croatia. Bosnia would be so good if we could retain those guys for our national team, Bojan Bogdanovic, Zubac, Matkovic, plus the guys we already have lol. :p
 
The most convincing comment in the forum on Coach Christie's handling of recent games is that he defers to the "stars" too much. His reliance on the starting line-up, with their limited defense, is consistent...just examine the playing times in post #398. The heavy minutes load in a back-to-back game looks to have taken a toll.

While DeRosan pretty much won the first game of the Pelican pair at the end, he had to be a bit fatigued in this game with so many minutes played. Christie, and the team, stuck with him for his reputation and recent performances. The decision was logical but the outcome didn't match the logic. How soon Christie should have recognized the failings and changed approach is up for debate. It appeared that he was in a repeating cycle of "next shot" in anticipation that DeRosan would repeat his performance of the night before. It was a reasonable expectation but changing the strategy came too late.

The remedy is evident. Start the "stars" as the hierarchy demands. Then quickly schedule DeRosan (for Ellis, LaRavia, Lyles, Valanciunas), Monk (for a PG such as Carter or Fultz) for defensive replacements unless DeRosan and/or Monk are remarkably effective scoring in that game. Bring them back in the game on a "need" or performance boost basis. Monk would essentially be a 6th man spark, at which he excels, while DeRosan could remain fresh the entire game by playing intermittently.

Such a tactic would leave Sabonis, LaVine, and Murray as true starters with sufficient offense while more defense would join them on the floor. LaVine and Murray would carry the perimeter scoring chores. Murray would have the incentive to be far more aggressive and may be more consistent in the offensive participation that the team only sees in spurts with him as the fifth option.

This simplistic observation is solely based on what is seen on the TV screen. There are far more complexities at play for Christie to navigate than to which we are privy. Thus, the likelihood of the above coming to fruition is minimal at best.

Experimenting to this extent when desperately trying to win to earn a playoff position may be counterproductive in Christie's view..
 
Last edited:
The most convincing comment in the forum on Coach Christie's handling of recent games is that he defers to the "stars" too much. His reliance on the starting line-up, with their limited defense, is consistent...just examine the playing times in post #398. The heavy minutes load in a back-to-back game looks to have taken a toll.

While DeRosan pretty much won the first game of the pair at the end, he had to be a bit fatigued in this game with so many minutes played. Christie, and the team, stuck with him for his reputation and recent performances. The decision was logical but the outcome didn't match the logic. How soon Christie should have recognized the failings and changed approach is up for debate. It appeared that he was in a repeating cycle of "next shot" in anticipation that DeRosan would repeat his performance of the night before. It was a reasonable expectation but changing the strategy came too late.

The remedy is evident. Start the "stars" as the hierarchy demands. Then schedule DeRosan (for Ellis, LaRavia, Lyles, Valanciunas), Monk (for a PG such as Carter or Fultz) as defensive replacements unless DeRosan and/or Monk are remarkably effective scoring in that game. Bring them back in the game on a "need" or performance boost basis. Monk would essentially be a 6th man spark, at which he excels, while DeRosan could remain fresh the entire game by playing intermittently.

Such a tactic would leave Sabonis, LaVine, and Murray as true starters with sufficient offense while more defense would join them on the floor. LaVine and Murray would carry the perimeter scoring chores. Murray would have the incentive to be far more aggressive and may be more consistent in the offensive participation that the team only sees in spurts with him as the fifth option.

This simplistic observation is solely based on what is seen on the TV screen. There are far more complexities at play for Christie to navigate than to which we are privy. Thus, the likelihood of the above coming to fruition is minimal at best.

Experimenting to this extent when desperately trying to win to earn a playoff position may be counterproductive in Christie's view..
I wonder how much freedom Christie has to do as he pleases without blowback from the FO or ownership? Right or wrong, Christie comes across as a yes man to me. If management wanted a player who was making a ton of money in the lineup Christie would do as he’s told.
 
I wonder how much freedom Christie has to do as he pleases without blowback from the FO or ownership? Right or wrong, Christie comes across as a yes man to me. If management wanted a player who was making a ton of money in the lineup Christie would do as he’s told.
He just doesn't have much standing right now. Heck, he's on an assistant coach salary. Once he gets a real contract, I'm sure that'll be part of the conversation.
 
Last edited:
I wonder how much freedom Christie has to do as he pleases without blowback from the FO or ownership? Right or wrong, Christie comes across as a yes man to me. If management wanted a player who was making a ton of money in the lineup Christie would do as he’s told.
Might not find out the full extent of his own style and opinions, unless until he is given a contract above interim. For the time being, he'll probably have to politic in order to have a chance at it
 
He just doesn't have much standing right now. Heck, he's on an assistant coach salary. Once he get a real contract, I'm sure that'll be part of the conversation.
I think it is standard practice for the assistant coach that becomes Interim Head Coach, to get a salary bump for the change to head coach. I would expect / hope that he got more money to be interim head coach.
 
I think it is standard practice for the assistant coach that becomes Interim Head Coach, to get a salary bump for the change to head coach. I would expect / hope that he got more money to be interim head coach.
It's a half season bump.....and not enough in his eyes to justify doing anything that would jeopardize his future with the organization
 
I wonder how much freedom Christie has to do as he pleases without blowback from the FO or ownership? Right or wrong, Christie comes across as a yes man to me. If management wanted a player who was making a ton of money in the lineup Christie would do as he’s told.
All head coaches are “Yes Men” up to a point. It just depends on how successful they are. Doug still has the label “interim” in front of head coach. He has no Head Coach contract and no leverage at this point. I have no doubt that he wants to be the official head coach of this team. At this young stage of his coaching career, he has no choice, but to say yes to ownership. I wouldn’t expect to see that label removed until he can show ownership that he can get his team to win. By that I mean get to the playoffs and win a series. Tonight’s game which I admit, I didn’t watch, was a bad loss which coulda, shoulda been a win against the lowly short handed Pelicans. Your Center grabs 28 rebounds and no one can step up and make shots at crunch time to win or stop the Kings killer CJ McCollum. Glad I couldn’t watch it or invest my time and energy in this game.

What I am hoping for is that the players get some rest during the All-Star break. Hopefully they come back before the next game, which I believe is against the Warriors, which will be a tough one, rested and motivated where the players finally get an opportunity to practice together, learn each other‘s tendencies, and draw up some actual plays instead of playing willy-nilly and play with a sense of urgency and focus that takes them to the next level. The talent is there. Time will tell.
 
As much as I'd love to be proven wrong I don't think a full preseason is going to help. Any starting lineup that features Malik Monk, DeMar Derozan, and Zach Lavine is going to be heavily iso focused. These players are who they are at this point.
Since this has never happened for an extended period of time, postulating so is mere conjecture. I'm going to take a wait and see (and sip some wine) attitude.
 
Last edited: