Similar thing happened with the Celtics once Rondo went down. I love Rondo, but he is so ball dominant that the other players got a little lazy. Rondo goes down, suddenly Bradley, Pierce, and Lee have to handle the ball and get the offense going, they get involved and are more engaged in the game by default just because they get to touch the basketball.
I was just thinking about that with Rondo when i typed that. But it's a lot more tolerable when you're a top 5 PG and the best defensive PG in the game, as well as get double digit assists almost nightly. IT still has never had a 10 ast game as it was reported last night was his career high.
Right now everyone is moving and expecting the pass, as we don't just have one person pounding the ball up top. This is beautiful.
Or a picture of an inhaler.Someone needs to hand Smart a piece of paper with the definition of "breather" on it.
Yup. First thing is Rondo doesn't take shots away from anyone, whether it was the big 3 or the current roster. Second, if you have a Rondo type, you don't put a ball dominant player next to him. While Pierce is a good iso player, he's also a great catch and shoot, spot up player. Allen obviously was as well and KG is a very good spot up shooter. But Rondo is more than comfortable giving the ball to guys where they want it and letting them go to work. IT not so much.I was going to add that to my point, too. It has to be one strategy or the other.
You can have a guy run your team completely is he's a super talent. We are giving Isaiah Thomas Rondo level team control, and that is just not a good recipe for success. When you don't have a Rondo, Paul, etc you need to run the offense through your best players.
No offense to Douglas, but why are we giving him garbage time mins in the 2nd quarter?
Just as long as he stays inside the three-point line from now on, I'm cool.Patterson is pretty automatic as a spot up shooter.
Needless to say, great half.