ForlornKing
Starter
They need to be going to Martin a lot more.
I mean c'mon, the team's leading scorer, and hes got like 4 touches...
I mean c'mon, the team's leading scorer, and hes got like 4 touches...
Grizzlies @ Kings Game Thread
- Thread starter piksi
- Start date
- Status
kennadog
Dog On It!
We are not defending their teeny line-up very well. And Kevin isn't getting many shots after that quick start.
I could hardly believe Mike got that shot off so quick, let alone hit it. That guy is always aware of the clock. He must have a stopwatch in his head.
Nice deflection by Kev to give Bibby the chance.
All in all, I can't believe the 1-5, Pau-less Grizz are doing this to us, at home.
Not liking it.....at all.
I could hardly believe Mike got that shot off so quick, let alone hit it. That guy is always aware of the clock. He must have a stopwatch in his head.
Nice deflection by Kev to give Bibby the chance.All in all, I can't believe the 1-5, Pau-less Grizz are doing this to us, at home.
Not liking it.....at all.
Roman
Bench
He's getting touches, but he's not taking advantage of them. He's settling for 3s. 5 shots, 4 of them 3s.
You can't force shots on a player like KMoney. He's not that type of player yet. We've got three guys that can legitimately create their own shots on any given play - Bibby, SAR and Artest.
Money gets his points through the flow. He's quiet. He'll get his, don't worry.
piksi
Hall of Famer
we shouldn't have started it in the first place
Roman
Bench
The TOs are a little inflated.
You've got a couple bad passes, a terrible charging call and a suspect travel call.
Corliss had a few bad passes, SAR had a bad pass ... but most of our TOs aren't bad TOs. You take out the BLATANTLY bad charge and the *new* and *improved* travel calls ... and we've got 7 TOs.
I'm not too worried.
kennadog
Dog On It!
Grant and Jerry explained that the restricted circle isn't in play in that situation due to where the ball was caught. So defender's feet in or out of the circle doesn't matter. However, they felt the call still could've been a blocking foul. Altho, they are homers.
Entity
Hall of Famer
Only thing about that is we still got the ball and we scored. So the block goes for not.
Roman
Bench
Grant and Jerry explained that the restricted circle isn't in play in that situation due to where the ball was caught. So defender's feet in or out of the circle doesn't matter. However, they felt the call still could've been a blocking foul. Altho, they are homers.
I've never heard about the "restricted circle" being not in play, regardless of where you catch the ball. That's the point of the circle, so you can't "camp out" under the basket.
Also, if you watch the call, the guy doesn't have position.
It was a really, really, really bad call.
10 times out of 10 Kobe gets that call.
What's truly bad about it was that the call was made as an "and 1" and then it was overruled by a backcourt judge ... like he had any view on it?
PS - They ARE homers. I almost can't listen to them when they are on they are so bad.
piksi
Hall of Famer
more like 12 times out of 10 Kobe gets the call
Roman
Bench
AND the opponent gets two technicals and is called for a flagrant.
bibbinator
Bench
Arghhgh.
piksi
Hall of Famer
after hitting Kobe's elbow with his chin
Viking
Starter
ha, we think alike yet again
KingsChick
Starter
This is just plain nasty at this point. 
piksi
Hall of Famer
well, what else is new ?
kennadog
Dog On It!
Roman: While it still may be a questionable call, here's the rule
http://www.betterbasketball.com/basketball-rules/nba-basketball-rules.html
http://www.betterbasketball.com/basketball-rules/nba-basketball-rules.html
OptimusRhyme
Jive Turkey
Wow Martin...
KingsChick
Starter
Yes there we go... there's the Martin we know. 
OptimusRhyme
Jive Turkey
No doubt, hes playing really well, especially on the boards.
DocHolliday
Starter
I think Shareef saw the thread about not having *THIS* Shareef, questioning his aggressive. That little dance after the dunk was him saying..WHAT?? WHAT????
- Status
Similar threads
