with the wings pool dwindling down, would we rather overspend for parker or lavine or get a combo of cheaper free agents to fill needs in sf hezonja and back up pg in van vleet or napier? basically all our eggs in one basket or spread the wealth
That may be true, but their at the luxury tax nowtheir teams have bird rights, can go over the cap to sign them
They should stretch Shumpert and/or Zach and kill this marketplace while they have no competition
honest question since i havent really followed anderson. they say many players from the spurs are system guys and might not look as good in a different team, but last year he avg 7.9 points and shot 33% from the 3 which isnt too impressive. are we hoping on upward trajection or am i missing somethingI'm firmly all-in on team "bring in FVV and Kyle Anderson" as two role players who will make us significantly better next year. So, spread the wealth.
not many left, like 70% of the free agent wings got gobbled up in the first 20 mins of free agencyHopefully the Knicks save us from Hezonja
Don’t mind him, but there are better players
Capela/Nurkic are better, proven playersnot many left, like 70% of the free agent wings got gobbled up in the first 20 mins of free agency
Think of a slug or a turtle, then reduce its speed by half, that is anderson. He doesnt hurry he doesnt rush. He is steady, makes good decisions with the ball.honest question since i havent really followed anderson. they say many players from the spurs are system guys and might not look as good in a different team, but last year he avg 7.9 points and shot 33% from the 3 which isnt too impressive. are we hoping on upward trajection or am i missing something
Capela/Nurkic are better, proven players
honest question since i havent really followed anderson. they say many players from the spurs are system guys and might not look as good in a different team, but last year he avg 7.9 points and shot 33% from the 3 which isnt too impressive. are we hoping on upward trajection or am i missing something
I want Capela/Nurkic on the team, but even if others think they are superfluous, get them on asset deals like you tried to do with Hill
so not really 3 and D but more like a defensive specialist?You are missing the other end of the court where he was one of the best defensive wings in the NBA.
so not really 3 and D but more like a defensive specialist?
honest question since i havent really followed anderson. they say many players from the spurs are system guys and might not look as good in a different team, but last year he avg 7.9 points and shot 33% from the 3 which isnt too impressive. are we hoping on upward trajection or am i missing something
You don’t understand they are factually better players than who else is being suggested?I really don't understand your logic with wanting these guys when we have two highly touted big men ready to go on Monday and one flimsy SF in JJ that might not even have a place in the league.
Hill wasn't an asset deal. We're stuck with Shumpert this year because of him.
i wonder if vlade ever learned how to pick up the phoneNo Kings action tonight, I guess Vlade had to go to bed early. But the Lakers lost out on Paul George so I call tonight a win![]()
You don’t understand they are factually better players than who else is being suggested?
Is that hard?
You're missing a lot.
He's one of the best defenders in the NBA. Advanced stats absolutely love him and he makes an tremendous impact on the game, despite not scoring the ball. He's an extremely talented playmaker and ball-handler for a wing. He's a 3/4 flex wing which are so valuable in today's game.
ESP47 and I had a conversation about it in the Elf Payton thread, with regards to the scoring, but I think he may have the case of just being held back in Pop's offense. There's nothing in his stat profile that suggests he can't handle a much larger workload on offense. His 13% USG is just so weird for a guy who's a good playmaker for his position.and is efficient in scoring. That's honestly the only real question I have with him; what is the reasoning behind the weird 13% USG rate?
You're paying a ton of money to possibly upgrade a position by a little bit. Nurkic isn't even that much better than Koufos is. Capela is going to be expensive as hell and Giles has all the makings of a Capela. You sign one of those guys and you're either going to wind up with an albatross contract or a waste of a first round draft pick. Not to mention the fact that the game is moving away from big men so they have even lesser value.
Meanwhile we have the SF position that probably had just about the worst productivity of any team in the entire league last year and you'd be completely ignoring that to upgrade a non position of need by a couple of ticks. Just winding up with an average player at SF makes the team much much better than landing either Capela or Nurkic.
Nah JJ is going to be in the league for 10+ years.I really don't understand your logic with wanting these guys when we have two highly touted big men ready to go on Monday and one flimsy SF in JJ that might not even have a place in the league.
Hill wasn't an asset deal. We're stuck with Shumpert this year because of him.
To be fair the Pacers badly needed another 3 point shooter, he should help them a lotDoug McBuckets deal is bad too. Too many years and too much money for just a shooter.