yea ... no. thats awful for the Kings
awful? When this is an awful return from your point of view, than what would be the right deal for Rudy?
Crowder was one of the most improved players last year, he was outstanding on the defensive end for the Celtics and did ok on offense, he is on a very valuable contract.
Rozier is a young, athletic PG prospect, that hasn't shown much so far, but came in a few times during the season and did well. Not a player I'm exited about, but certainly NBA level talent.
If Crowder is able to sustain his production he will give you great D for 3 positions, switching ability, good unselfish ball movement and around 10-15 ppg.
So we are talking about a very good starting SF/small ball PF and a potential backup/3rd string PG for Rudy Gay on a one year deal. That's awful?
I know Rudy will give us around 17-20ppg and his ability to create his own shot. But he is up for an extension and is a below average defender due to his lack of intensity and hustle on that end.
We won't be able to beat teams with our talent alone like OKC with Russ and KD and we won't be able to aquire that kind of talent with our available assets. Therefore the key lies in finding a system, that allows us to cover for our lack of talent, a system that allows roleplayers to step up.
Usually those kind of systems start on the defensive end - so every player in the unit should be a +defender. On offense it's usually ball movement,screens and cuts, that create a lot of open looks, that even role players can convert over countless isolation hero ball plays.
The Celtics managed to get into the Playoffs doing just that - defend, move the ball, take what the D gives you. IT was their only guy able to make 1vs1 plays. I'm pretty confident, that Cousins as the only guy able to make 1vs1 plays is vastly superior than IT.
It's a risk, because we don't know if Cuz is able to stay healthy, but this team fell apart, when Cousins went down no matter, if Gay was on the roster or not.