2022 Everything Free Agency/Trades Thread

First round bust? He was picked 17th in a strong draft and has justified his draft position easily.

The outcry isn't that we gave up Klay Thompson. The outcry is over the fact that acquiring DDV level players through free agency is very difficult for this team. Go look through the free agent signings from the last 10 years and you'll be pretty disappointed in what you see. Whether you think DDV is any good or not doesn't change the fact that the Kings rarely sign anyone that is better than DDV.
Oh I’m aware of how sad the Kings FA acquisitions have been over the years. But that lends it hand to my line of thinking here, quit cluttering the roster full of mid-level players. If they’re not going to help us win this year, or don’t have upside and potential to grow into, let them leave and sign some one cheap who we can manage around when needed to throw big money at some one. Whether it be our own FAs or one available. Kings are never selling anyone on location, so they better let their money talk.
 
Between this and the second rounders plus whatever happens with Ivey, this feels like the summer the fan base starts to legitimately question Monte

hope this works out but not even extending a QO is malpractice. You only do that if you’re done with the player completely and have no intention of trying to keep him
Don't count on it. They're heavily invested in him.
 
What does DDV provide? Off-ball defense, cutting, and (in theory) hitting open looks.

If De'aaron Fox is your point guard, that is what you want.

Remind me again of what our SG rotation is now? DDV, like Barnes, was more valuable to us than anyone else. We can't just afford to throw away rotation pieces at positions we're weak at.

Terrence Davis, a slasher. And Justin Holiday, who was doo-doo for us.,

Even if Davis wasn't a questionable fit, that rotation ain't good enough.

And before anyone says Davion, he like Fox, might as well not exist without the ball in his hands. Even on defense he's more skewed as an on-ball defender at the point of attack.
 
What does DDV provide? Off-ball defense, cutting, and (in theory) hitting open looks.

If De'aaron Fox is your point guard, that is what you want.

Remind me again of what our SG rotation is now?

Terrence Davis, a slasher. And Justin Holiday, who was doo-doo for us.,

Even if Davis wasn't a questionable fit, that rotation ain't good enough.

And before anyone says Davion, he like Fox, might as well not exist without the ball in his hands. Even on defense he's more skewed as an on-ball defender at the point of attack.
Only a few things can happen that make this make sense;

-We're trading for Kevin Huerter

-We needed to clear the roster spot to pull GPII away from the Warriors

-Opening up a spot for one of the Martin twins to start.

-Same things, but to bring Oladipo or Gary Harris on as "prove it" deals (ugh)

Kings are basically drawing to one out in terms of FA SG's that's better than DDV (GPII).
 
What does DDV provide? Off-ball defense, cutting, and (in theory) hitting open looks.

If De'aaron Fox is your point guard, that is what you want.

Remind me again of what our SG rotation is now? DDV, like Barnes, was more valuable to us than anyone else. We can't just afford to throw away rotation pieces at positions we're weak at.

Terrence Davis, a slasher. And Justin Holiday, who was doo-doo for us.,

Even if Davis wasn't a questionable fit, that rotation ain't good enough.

And before anyone says Davion, he like Fox, might as well not exist without the ball in his hands. Even on defense he's more skewed as an on-ball defender at the point of attack.
We haven’t even gotten to the opening minutes of FA yet haha. Let’s calm down aboht the depth and rotation that our team has.
 
Only a few things can happen that make this make sense;

-We're trading for Kevin Huerter

-We needed to clear the roster spot to pull GPII away from the Warriors

-Opening up a spot for one of the Martin twins to start.

-Same things, but to bring Oladipo or Gary Harris on as "prove it" deals (ugh)

Kings are basically drawing to one out in terms of FA SG's that's better than DDV (GPII).
You know, this could mean something. Even with 9 million in space, that would mean the Kings could take on a Collins while giving a team like the Hawks some instant cap relief without having to involve equal salary. Holmes/picks for Collins is possible with that space. Or what about the Sixers? Thybulle or instant relief is possible.
 

Capt. Factorial

trifolium contra tempestatem subrigere certum est
Staff member
I would hate them to do it, but do they maybe need Donte on a price hike to get up over the cap? Or do the cap holds do that anyway? If they overpaid Donte on a 1 year deal that to me would be way better than any long term guarantees.
Cap holds will do that anyway. But I'm not sure why we would want to get *over* the cap - perhaps to use the full MLE instead of the room MLE? Still, the cap hold would give us that by itself.
 
If it’s Red Velvet, how do we feel about that? He is known as a shooter but so far has hovered around 36-38 ish percent from three. I haven’t watched him enough to have an opinion
 
Only a few things can happen that make this make sense;

-We're trading for Kevin Huerter

-We needed to clear the roster spot to pull GPII away from the Warriors

-Opening up a spot for one of the Martin twins to start.

-Same things, but to bring Oladipo or Gary Harris on as "prove it" deals (ugh)

Kings are basically drawing to one out in terms of FA SG's that's better than DDV (GPII).
We haven’t even gotten to the opening minutes of FA yet haha. Let’s calm down aboht the depth and rotation that our team has.
Sorry, I'm not participating in the 12th Annual Kings "Move that only makes sense if there's a follow-up" this time around.

I'd sooner just assume what you see is what you get, and if there is a follow-up I'd be pleasantly surprised. We'll probably make some ho-hum FA signings at the PG and C and call it a day.
 
DDV is a starter/high-level 6th man that's already proven to be a valuable asset to a championship team. Impact stats, everything lines up with him being very very good.

He's not someone I would have paid $15mil+/season, but he's a role player that the Kings basically never get access to. $10mil/season should have been a no-brainer.
He was with the Kings only a brief amount of time last season, and I can understand why he didn't make a huge impression on many, but sometimes I feel like Kings fans just don't recognize where value is actually located amongst the players on the team. If the goal is to win, you have to fill out a roster with quality impact players. DDV's metrics for his career suggest that he is one. If he signs elsewhere, good luck finding another player with his potential impact for less money than we likely would have ended up paying him.
 
Cap holds will do that anyway. But I'm not sure why we would want to get *over* the cap - perhaps to use the full MLE instead of the room MLE? Still, the cap hold would give us that by itself.
Yeah, that's what I was wondering. Thanks for the info. Although, if the Kings renounce the holds and get space they could easily just get some salary dumps to get there I would imagine.
 
Only a few things can happen that make this make sense;

-We're trading for Kevin Huerter

-We needed to clear the roster spot to pull GPII away from the Warriors

-Opening up a spot for one of the Martin twins to start.

-Same things, but to bring Oladipo or Gary Harris on as "prove it" deals (ugh)

Kings are basically drawing to one out in terms of FA SG's that's better than DDV (GPII).
Gary Harris was solid for the Magic last season.. I dont think he needs to prove anything..

Harris was much better for the Magic than DDV was for the Kings or Bucks last season, idk why he'd be in the 'prove it' category..

DDV shot 35% from the field, he seems more like a 'prove it' deal than Harris to me..
 

Capt. Factorial

trifolium contra tempestatem subrigere certum est
Staff member
Don't count on it. They're heavily invested in him.
I'm not sure there's anybody "heavily invested" in Monte, just people who have a bit less of a hair-trigger to call for someone's head the instant there's a questionable move. I mean, sure, it's fair to say that Monte now has at least two questionable asset management moves on his docket this offseason, between punting on the #37 and not offering DDV the QO. But those of us who are "heavily invested" in not jumping to conclusions are willing to at least wait it out through the first few days of free agency.
 

hrdboild

Moloch in whom I dream Angels!
Staff member
The Spurs are clearly tanking for Wembanyama right?

The Donte news is a little confusing but we did hear about this before -- that DDV felt like he didn't have a guaranteed starting role for next season and might want to look elsewhere. I'm not sure he's a great fit either given his erratic outside shooting. This could be an indication that we'll see a Fox/Mitchell starting backcourt next season or that Monte and Coach Brown have their eye on someone else in FA, or that stocking the Summer League team with nothing but 3&D wings wasn't just an empty exercise in taunting Kings fans?
 
Yeah, outrage is a no go, but that's why you pick up his QO though, in case they do, they might be willing to give up something in trade.
You don’t pick up the Qualifying offer if he would have taken it and tied your hand for a longer term move. The bigger question is why not use 37 to draft Hardy who plays the same spot?
 
The Spurs are clearly tanking for Wembanyama right?

The Donte news is a little confusing but we did hear about this before -- that DDV felt like he didn't have a guaranteed starting role for next season and might want to look elsewhere. I'm not sure he's a great fit either given his erratic outside shooting. This could be an indication that we'll see a Fox/Mitchell starting backcourt next season or that Monte and Coach Brown have their eye on someone else in FA, or that stocking the Summer League team with nothing but 3&D wings wasn't just an empty exercise in taunting Kings fans?
I think the spurs realized that Murray's timeline didn't mesh with where they were headed and weren't going to max him out in a couple years. They tried to sell high.... however, I'm not sure the Hawks deal is really all that much of a sell high gamble. Sounds like they got at least one unprotected pick (which is odd nowadays), but what are the odds that will really be anything better than a late lottery/mid-teens draft pick.
 
You don’t pick up the Qualifying offer if he would have taken it and tied your hand for a longer term move. The bigger question is why not use 37 to draft Hardy who plays the same spot?
Yeah, now to see what the Kings do with that potential free space. Yeah, this all has to fit into something else. Or it's just Kangz, never know. haha.
 
He was with the Kings only a brief amount of time last season, and I can understand why he didn't make a huge impression on many, but sometimes I feel like Kings fans just don't recognize where value is actually located amongst the players on the team. If the goal is to win, you have to fill out a roster with quality impact players. DDV's metrics for his career suggest that he is one. If he signs elsewhere, good luck finding another player with his potential impact for less money than we likely would have ended up paying him.
I’m curious to see these metrics, as now three NBA teams have given up on him. This also assumes that DDV reaches his “potential” and then after reaching said potential wants to resign with the Kings. Being that that would all be hypothetical to happen and far from certain, the flip side could be a wasted roster spot, wasted money on a disgruntled player who never really wanted to be here anyways.
 
The Spurs are clearly tanking for Wembanyama right?
It's interesting to see the Spurs stepping onto this path while Gregg Popovich still seems firmly committed to coaching. He hasn't steered a true rebuilding team since his first season head coaching the Spurs, and even then, it wasn't really a "rebuilding" situation. David Robinson was hurt, and the Spurs famously took Tim Duncan in the draft that year. Other than that first season on the job, Pop hadn't coached a Spurs team to a record below .500 until the 2019-2020 season (that's 22 straight years of winning records!), and they've remained mired in sub-.500 mediocrity since then, so it makes sense that they want to take an honest shot at a rebuild. I just can't imagine Gregg Popovich at his age in full-on development mode, dealing with the trials and tribulations of helping young players grow.