Well he can play SOME SF if Derrick Williams and Jerami Grant (in Philly) could play SF why can't Marvin play a limited amount at SF, not saying he's a permanent SF I mean even JaKar Sampson played some SF for the Kings. In some situation due to his mobility and athletic ability he could slide down and be a post up SF on offense.Im glad this didnt go unnoticed. If you say "He can play small forward", it should start some heated discussions. Wether it was a misstatement or a miscalculation of the intelligence of this fanbase, Im glad he had to come up and correct what he said.
Well he can play SOME SF if Derrick Williams and Jerami Grant (in Philly) could play SF why can't Marvin play a limited amount at SF, not saying he's a permanent SF I mean even JaKar Sampson played some SF for the Kings. In some situation due to his mobility and athletic ability he could slide down and be a post up SF on offense.
I don't think he would be any worse as a SF (not advocating for a second he should be) than what we had last season there but I agree with you they are trying to oversell him but that's what every team does with every pick e.g player X can defend positions 1-5 and these types of statements.I think that last thing this fanbase wants is Bagley playing sf with two other bigs. In general Nba fan knows how the game is played today, knows the importance of spacing, knows what you would ideally want from your small forward. Bagley isnt a 3point shooter, he isnt a skilled perimeter player and he isnt a defender. And Im not trying to trash Bagley, he just isnt Sf and shouldnt play sf at all. He is a big man and thats where his strengths are. I think that statement was just him overselling the guy and trying to convince others he made the right choice but the fans werent dumb and it backfired on him
I don't think he would be any worse as a SF (not advocating for a second he should be) than what we had last season there but I agree with you they are trying to oversell him but that's what every team does with every pick e.g player X can defend positions 1-5 and these types of statements.
Imo literally anyone who can shoot and slide Bagley to 4/5 will make the offense better than Bagley being 3 with two other bigs.
And yeah Gms allways exaggerate a little but that was just too much and fans noticed it
Vlade saying that Bagley was a "better fit, better player" than Doncic and that it was an easy choice for them strikes me as a bit odd.
I think it's something about the way he says it, which is almost dismissively.
We'll never know for sure but I'm still left wondering if there was truth to the rumors that Doncic refused to play in Sacramento.
Vlade saying that Bagley was a "better fit, better player" than Doncic and that it was an easy choice for them strikes me as a bit odd.
I think it's something about the way he says it, which is almost dismissively.
We'll never know for sure but I'm still left wondering if there was truth to the rumors that Doncic refused to play in Sacramento.
Vlade saying that Bagley was a "better fit, better player" than Doncic and that it was an easy choice for them strikes me as a bit odd.
I think it's something about the way he says it, which is almost dismissively.
We'll never know for sure but I'm still left wondering if there was truth to the rumors that Doncic refused to play in Sacramento.
I think they liked Doncic but they really believe that Bagley is the best player in the draft. Also keeps ball in Fox’ hands more.The mannerism was sort of incredulous, as in "what do you mean, of course we picked Bagley". I still doubt Luka straight out refused to play for Sacramento, but I'm starting to think that he might not have given them the warm and fuzzy feeling Bagley did. He probably did not seem "all in" for them to commit to him and take the ball out of Fox's hands. Its possible.
In retrospect so am I (a little). I still think Luka would’ve been fine or at the least not pulled a Steve Francis
But also fit can’t be understated. Vlade/Joerger are trying to win in the short term, and if that’s easier to do because of position/player personnel it would help
I think they liked Doncic but they really believe that Bagley is the best player in the draft. Also keeps ball in Fox’ hands more.
Everything they have said publicly since the end of the season implies that they view 2019 as another development season with the goal of winning in the future. Now, one can argue that while this might have been their plan if they did not have to worry about their jobs, they will focus more on winning now in order to keep the ownership satisfied with the results of their work. I personally feel they have more leeway with ownership than people seem to think..
Not all the national media is out to get us
I don’t think it was a short term decision at all. I think the team still thinks they have an all star in fox and so adding Luka means one of their top two assets would eventually need to go (or by not being as effective). It was clearly a ‘sum of the parts’ decision with the next 5 to 10 years in mind — although quite possible they also thought Bagley was the better player regardless.But also fit can’t be understated. Vlade/Joerger are trying to win in the short term, and if that’s easier to do because of position/player personnel it would help
Isn't Otto Porter considered a small forward? I think Bagley could guard him, as Otto is more of an outside shooting/rebounder/defense kind of three, not a slasher. If Vlade said that Bagley can guard some small forwards, I see no problem with that whatsoever. It's the slashing type of 3s that I can see him have difficulty with, not the 3 and D guys that aren't as adept at handling the ball.
Not all the national media is out to get us
here, this link starts the press conference video at the time the question is asked and that particular answer is given:
Bagley got two workouts in between arriving in Sacramento and his press conference. Meanwhile Luka is too tired to play in Summer League. Vlade wins![]()
I don’t think it was a short term decision at all. I think the team still thinks they have an all star in fox and so adding Luka means one of their top two assets would eventually need to go (or by not being as effective). It was clearly a ‘sum of the parts’ decision with the next 5 to 10 years in mind — although quite possible they also thought Bagley was the better player regardless.
Good analysis of the press conference. But then again, I want to give the benefit of doubt.This is what I learned from this press conference:
1) Vlade wants this team to play fast - RUN!
2) They considered both ability and fit in this draft
3) One of his considerations in making up this team is having enough minutes to develop the young guys.
4) He thinks in terms of a two or three year time frame to evaluate their young guys [and know if they are going to make the cut.]
5) He likes the competition within the team.
5) This is my interpretation of Divac's comments on players like Bagley and WCS being able to play the 3, 4 and 5:
He's putting forth the message to the NBA that the Kings aren't desperate to trade any of their bigs because of the perceived glut of bigs on this team. He doesn't want to negotiate a trade of any big from a position of weakness. He realizes that there may be the perception around the league that he is in a position of weakness because of the perceived glut. He's downplaying the glut by saying that some of these bigs can play the 3 and 4 at times He's talking up WCS and his ability to play the 3, 4 and 5. Whether he is talking him up because he really does want to keep him, or because he really wants to trade him, is the question. There is nothing in the news conference to tell you one way or the other.
The Kings under Vlade have only drafted players who come work out for them..except in 2016 when nobody came to work out for us. I'm not saying he doesn't think Bagley is the #1 player, but having him come out for a visit and workout probably made him like Bagley a lot more hence the "better player". "better fit"... I still think this 10000% pertains to Fox. Doncic will take the ball out of Fox's hands. Vlade and the FO see Fox as our franchise face. Fox is at his best with the ball in his hands. I'm also not sure how Fox would react being the secondary playmaker, because Doncic would've been our half-court facilitator. I'm guessing Vlade also thinks we already have other somewhat ball-dom players in Buddy, Bogdan, WCS, and Giles?Vlade saying that Bagley was a "better fit, better player" than Doncic and that it was an easy choice for them strikes me as a bit odd.
I think it's something about the way he says it, which is almost dismissively.
We'll never know for sure but I'm still left wondering if there was truth to the rumors that Doncic refused to play in Sacramento.