VSL Game 3 Thread - Kings vs. Bucks

Status
Not open for further replies.
K

Kingsguy881

Guest
brick was right about that one.
Do me a favor and go back and read Bricks assessment of Evans game yesterday. One of the people I most respect on this site is Brick, he tells it like it is with no sugar coating, and the man has great basketball knowledge, I would be led to believe he has more than myself which is a high compliment.
 
My post count and join date notwithstanding, my love of the Kings goes back to before a lot of people's. Season tickets in the old one level Arena.
i'd like to point out that neither side of this statement is relevant. your join date is irrelevant to the actual validity of your posts. your love of the team and basketball acumen are irrelevant to the validity of your post. what matters is if what you are saying actually makes sense. as an aside, the bloggers who post about "their knowledge of the game" do so to paint themselves as an expert and authoritative figure whose statements are fact and not opinion. sorry, it just gets me when i see comments like:

My knowledge of basketball transcends most of the people in here.
but back to the basketball matter. one thing you said here stands out to me about evans:

Rookies learn from their mistakes, you can teach them. You can't teach physical gifts, intincts, potential, drive. Every point that is being made negatively about Evans game can be taught or fixed with a little experience. Everything that he already brings to the table can't be taught, he just has the ability and thats it. You don't find that often, and he has it. He is going to be great because he has the physical abilities and the only things he doesn't do well are easy fixes, something he will learn over the course of his career. I'm not getting how you don't understand that. It's basic basketball logic.
this is one side of the coin. how exactly do you know that evans WILL "get it?" you think he will; aries thinks he may not. it's a difference of opinion and what i don't get is why is he automatically labeled "hate-brigade," and you "homer."
 
K

Kingsguy881

Guest
i'd like to point out that neither side of this statement is relevant. your join date is irrelevant to the actual validity of your posts. your love of the team and basketball acumen are irrelevant to the validity of your post. what matters is if what you are saying actually makes sense. as an aside, the bloggers who post about "their knowledge of the game" do so to paint themselves as an expert and authoritative figure whose statements are fact and not opinion. sorry, it just gets me when i see comments like:



but back to the basketball matter. one thing you said here stands out to me about evans:



this is one side of the coin. how exactly do you know that evans WILL "get it?" you think he will; aries thinks he may not. it's a difference of opinion and what i don't get is why is he automatically labeled "hate-brigade," and you "homer."
In my first paragraph I was pointing out that my life and love of the Kings did not start the minute I joined this website, for probably the 3rd or 4th different BTW.

As far as my basketball knowledge, if you want to refute it ask me anything about the NBA and I will give you an educated response about it. Anything dating back to 1979.

I'm not saying Evans will get it, but according to Calipari he will. I respect Calipari, he is a great coach. Aries doesn't have a reason for thinking he won't, he just has an emotion. I'm basing mine off where Evans has been, and where he is going. Westphal coached a pretty good pg in Kevin Johnson who was not your prototypical pg, he was a scorer more than a passer. Calipari is one of the top coaches of the college ranks, and he switched Evans to pg with fantastic results. These coaches know what they are doing, I'm just basing my opinion on them whether or not he will "get it". My best educated guess is he will have to be Tim Thomas not to.
 
A

AriesMar27

Guest
Is Dwyane Wade "turnover prone"? LBJ? Kobe Bryant? LMAO!!!!!!

How is his scoring suspect? He has a penchant for getting to the line, so he doesn't get as many calls in his rookie season, he will in subsequent seasons and the Kings will reap those benefits.

Oh, and he will be half a foot taller than half of the people he plays in the NBA, so deal with it. Everything you point out can be refuted. Dwyane Wade is 6'4". He does most of the ball handling for his team. When the ball gets to the frontcourt who has it? Wade. This is a moot argument that will only be won 25 games into the season. I'll be back to spoonfeed the crow, don't doubt it.
and none of them are pgs.... lebron and wade tried their rookie season and failed.... lebron and wade failed... yet you guys expect evans to suceed where lebron james and his freak of nature gifts failed at...

i dont dislike evans, i just dont think he will be a pg... in any shape or form for his career... maybe it'll be just for his rookie season. hell they put durant at sg his rookie season and then sf where he belongs his second season...
 
how many of them were averaging 15/11/4steal? none... most of them are turnover prone like evans....

flynn is averaging 12pts/10ast
collison is averaging 19pts/6ast/5reb
evans is averaging 24/4/5to
By the way, Marcus Williams has been an NBA scrub through three seasons, and he just put up 17 assists with 1 TO.
 
A

AriesMar27

Guest
i'd like to point out that neither side of this statement is relevant. your join date is irrelevant to the actual validity of your posts. your love of the team and basketball acumen are irrelevant to the validity of your post. what matters is if what you are saying actually makes sense. as an aside, the bloggers who post about "their knowledge of the game" do so to paint themselves as an expert and authoritative figure whose statements are fact and not opinion. sorry, it just gets me when i see comments like:



but back to the basketball matter. one thing you said here stands out to me about evans:



this is one side of the coin. how exactly do you know that evans WILL "get it?" you think he will; aries thinks he may not. it's a difference of opinion and what i don't get is why is he automatically labeled "hate-brigade," and you "homer."

thank you.... i dont think that we would have come to that mutual understanding on our own... we wouldve continued to argue. because we all know that i am right, lol.....:D

see what i mean.
 
A

AriesMar27

Guest
By the way, Marcus Williams has been an NBA scrub through three seasons, and he just put up 17 assists with 1 TO.
he was supposed to be a good pg... but i see your point. maybe he'll have a breakout season this year. its not like the grizzlies have a real pg anyways. he should be able to beat out conley as starting pg.
 
As far as my basketball knowledge, if you want to refute it ask me anything about the NBA and I will give you an educated response about it.
oh no no, i won't refute that; i can almost say with absolutely certainty that you know more about the game than me. but what i will refute is that you know more than most people on this board; that's just a statement that can't be proven unless we all sit down and take a test. please VF, don't make us do so!

as far as evans, i get what you are saying and think that you are using pretty fair indicators. but i do believe that aries has more than just emotion; he's got past rookies' experiences and career histories to draw upon. and really, i'm super confused with all of this battling (on this and other threads) because...

...DEAR GOD, IT'S SUMMER LEAGUE. how can anything even remotely meaningful be drawn from this?!?!?
 
he was supposed to be a good pg... but i see your point. maybe he'll have a breakout season this year. its not like the grizzlies have a real pg anyways. he should be able to beat out conley as starting pg.
Conley's hate in this thread is bad. He is only going to be 22 this year. PG is a tough position. The 2nd half of the year he played extremely well when given the reigns of the team. It's one of the reasons why the Grizzles did not go after Rubio. In February through April (36 games), he averaged 15/4rebs/5.7a per game and over 1 steal a game and around 47% from the field and over 40% from 3. They also have Mayo and Gay who like to have the ball a lot. Conley isn't bad. This year he was a league average player, next year he should be above average which isn't bad as a 22 year old at all especially at PG which is a very tough position.

Just look at how long it took Nash, Billups, and others to great really great at PG. Memphis isn't giving up on Conley just yet.
 
A

AriesMar27

Guest
Do me a favor and go back and read Bricks assessment of Evans game yesterday. One of the people I most respect on this site is Brick, he tells it like it is with no sugar coating, and the man has great basketball knowledge, I would be led to believe he has more than myself which is a high compliment.
ugh... maybe this is where we are having problems and your join date does come into play.. i wasnt talking about evans... i was talking about bricks views on martin when he first came into the league. well, he still says the same things about martin, so i guess that hasnt really changed.
 
A

AriesMar27

Guest
Conley's hate in this thread is bad. He is only going to be 22 this year. PG is a tough position. The 2nd half of the year he played extremely well when given the reigns of the team. It's one of the reasons why the Grizzles did not go after Rubio. In February through April (36 games), he averaged 15/4rebs/5.7a per game and over 1 steal a game and around 47% from the field and over 40% from 3. They also have Mayo and Gay who like to have the ball a lot. Conley isn't bad. This year he was a league average player, next year he should be above average which isn't bad as a 22 year old at all especially at PG which is a very tough position.

Just look at how long it took Nash, Billups, and others to great really great at PG. Memphis isn't giving up on Conley just yet.
but like i said, williams was supposed to be a good pg. going into that draft he was considered the best pg in that draft, he just had character issues... and he was playing behind jason kidd. its not a knock on conley... williams was supposed to be a good pg. conley played well but so did beno his first year here. look at how that turned out.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In a lot of ways this is exactly the create his own offense guy we have been missing, and the big thing with a create his own offense guy is that if he is a willing passer he creates everybody else's offense too.
I don't see how anyone could read this and not get at least a little bit excited about the Evans pick. More than a point guard, this team simply needs a star. We may finally have one.

Now the TOs came in two areas -- first, in simply bringing the ball up the court. Not on the break, not running a pick and roll (although a few of his post feeds were shaky), but just getting picked trying to bring it up against a quick PG busting his butt on defense. That will be a problem, and in particular with the teaming with Kevin, who is a poor handler himself, and Noc who is not a ballhandler. Can't score if you can't get it over halfcourt. The second spot was in him trying to force too much action down inside on the drive or trying to punish Jennings in the post. That's not a huge concern -- that will be cut down with experience and with a more organized game than summer league.

...

Its too bad Porter did not want to join the staff -- an old PG mentor like that would be just what the doctor ordered. As would, as an aside, a Clyde Drexler level ballhandling SG to share the backcourt duties. Evans showed considerable PG promise this game, but the shakiness remains in that Kevin's game is built for a pure PG running mate, while Evan's game is built for a ballhandling combo guard type SG. Kevin needed Rubio. Evans could use a Roy or Manu or Christie type.
Sounds like there's a compelling argument for starting Garcia at SF over Noce. Or, if you want to go really wild, start Garcia/Noce on the wings with Kevin coming off the bench for 30+ minutes as a scoring super sub a la Manu.
 
K

Kingsguy881

Guest
ugh... maybe this is where we are having problems and your join date does come into play.. i wasnt talking about evans... i was talking about bricks views on martin when he first came into the league. well, he still says the same things about martin, so i guess that hasnt really changed.
I know....you were saying Brick was right. About something, anything. Brick is usually right. I'm pointing this out to you:

For people who did not watch the game, Evans was actually doing a very nice imitation of a competent PG in the halfcourt, and on the break. Not a ballhandling OG. A PG. He ran the pick and rolls. He knew exactly where to kick it on his drives. He's already got that. And his to the basket game, both off the dribble and in the post is going to be a real weapon that creates passing lanes for everybody else. In a lot of ways this is exactly the create his own offense guy we have been missing, and the big thing with a create his own offense guy is that if he is a willing passer he creates everybody else's offense too. That is where an off the ball movement guy like Kevin is notably inferior -- he doesn't help others get open. Reke's game is tailor made to get others open, if he's willing to pass it, and today he was for 3/4.

Now the TOs came in two areas -- first, in simply bringing the ball up the court. Not on the break, not running a pick and roll (although a few of his post feeds were shaky), but just getting picked trying to bring it up against a quick PG busting his butt on defense. That will be a problem, and in particular with the teaming with Kevin, who is a poor handler himself, and Noc who is not a ballhandler. Can't score if you can't get it over halfcourt. The second spot was in him trying to force too much action down inside on the drive or trying to punish Jennings in the post. That's not a huge concern -- that will be cut down with experience and with a more organized game than summer league.

He did quit passing late in the game and just tried to take it over wiht his own offense, but I'm not sure how bad a thing that was. He was the only guy doing anything on offense for most of the game (Landry had some moments), and it damn near worked until Jennings canned the sealing three there in the final seconds.

Its too bad Porter did not want to join the staff -- an old PG mentor like that would be just what the doctor ordered. As would, as an aside, a Clyde Drexler level ballhandling SG to share the backcourt duties. Evans showed considerable PG promise this game, but the shakiness remains in that Kevin's game is built for a pure PG running mate, while Evan's game is built for a ballhandling combo guard type SG. Kevin needed Rubio. Evans could use a Roy or Manu or Christie type.
 
but like i said, williams was supposed to be a good pg. going into that draft he was considered the best pg in that draft, he just had character issues... and he was playing behind jason kidd.
Marcus really never got a chance to be the #1 PG. He has played behind Jason Kidd, Devin Harris and Marco/Monta/Watson. The last 3 obviously not that impressive. Marcus might get a chance as the #2 PG in Memphis but he'll have to improve. Obviously the difference between him and Conley is smaller than between himself and Kidd, but he isn't a bad passer even in the NBA--the issue is his shooting %s are terrible.
 
how many of them were averaging 15/11/4steal? none... most of them are turnover prone like evans....

flynn is averaging 12pts/10ast
collison is averaging 19pts/6ast/5reb
evans is averaging 24/4/5to

his scoring is suspect since he is averaging just as many fta as fga... thats most due to the fact that he is 6 inches taller than everyone who is guarding him. that and the fact that they are all rookies as well... their first time guarding someone in the nba and he is half a foot taller than they are. yet they still end up winning the game.
Flynn is averaging 6.5 TO's per game. Must mean he'll continue that in the regular season and turn out to be a horrible point guard.
 
A

AriesMar27

Guest
I know....you were saying Brick was right. About something, anything. Brick is usually right. I'm pointing this out to you:

okay i get it... you and others here think that evans is a good player... i do too. i had a poorly received thread about trading martin and nocioni for tmac so that we could start evans at sg. i never said that he was a bad player in any way.... i just said that i dont think that he will be a pg. thats it. nothing else. just that one little thing. i am aware that he has good ball handling skills and hat he is a willing passer... i know that. he has a huge size advantage against most pllayers at pg but so did marko jaric and shaun livingston. though livingston got injured which sucked because he wouldve been a good player to compare evans to if he had stayed healthy and became the player that everyone wanted him to become.
 
A

AriesMar27

Guest
Flynn is averaging 6.5 TO's per game. Must mean he'll continue that in the regular season and turn out to be a horrible point guard.

but he is also averaging 10 assists... evans is averaging 5 turnovers and 4 assists... there is a big difference.

why am i being attacked by all of these new booties?
 
It makes little sense to judge any player after 3 summer league games, much less 3 seasons in the NBA. I will wait 3 seasons until I fully judge any player just selected to the draft. If they suck in 3 NBA seasons they will likely suck for their career. If they are good in 3, or even by the end of 2, then they will likely be good. After 3 summer league games, I know little to nothing about any player. It's nice that some guys do better in summer league than others, but who cares really.
 
K

Kingsguy881

Guest
but he is also averaging 10 assists... evans is averaging 5 turnovers and 4 assists... there is a big difference.

why am i being attacked by all of these new booties?
Because you are the only one fighting to make us believe Evans isn't going to work and we all believe he will, FROM WHAT WE HAVE SEEN!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think what AriesMar27 is saying is that while Evans is the better player, Jennings is the better PG. And I think he's right, at least for now. Jennings, as far as I know, played PG all his life while Evans is still getting his feet wet. So Jennings being more comfortable and the better facilitator than Evans is to be expected. But the key point is that Evans is the better player. I don't think there's any dispute on that.

And I have to concede that while Evans' play so far is very encouraging, the jury is still out on whether he's a PG. So AriesMar27's questioning of Evans is not without merit. But the way I see it, worst comes to worst we have a 20-8-5 player we can insert at SG or maybe even SF. It's still a pretty good situation. Or we get a point forward a la Hedo.

The point is, it's not a bad thing to have a triple-double threat on the team, regardless of his position. Jalen Rose, Steve Smith, and Anfernee Hardaway didn't turn out to be PG either but the teams never regretted drafting them. Bill Walton once said of a young Yao Ming, "He may be a project, but you want him to be YOUR project." The same can be said of Evans. If he turns out not be a PG, he's still a pretty good player. But if he does turn out to be PG, holllly cow, he can be one of best ever. I look at his ceiling and there's no doubt in my mind Evans is the right pick at the right time.
 
how many of them were averaging 15/11/4steal? none... most of them are turnover prone like evans....

flynn is averaging 12pts/10ast
collison is averaging 19pts/6ast/5reb
evans is averaging 24/4/5to

his scoring is suspect since he is averaging just as many fta as fga... thats most due to the fact that he is 6 inches taller than everyone who is guarding him. that and the fact that they are all rookies as well... their first time guarding someone in the nba and he is half a foot taller than they are. yet they still end up winning the game.
He's also averaging almost 8 rebounds a game, which is pretty much unheard of for a point guard--even at summer league.

And like I said earlier, a poor A/T ratio for a pg in summer league doesn't mean much.

Devin Harris averaged 3.5 assists to 5 TOs
Jameer Nelson averaged 2.3 assists and 3.3 TOs
Derrick Rose averaged 5.5 assists to 4 TOs
 
He's also averaging almost 8 rebounds a game, which is pretty much unheard of for a point guard--even at summer league.

And like I said earlier, a poor A/T ratio for a pg in summer league doesn't mean much.

Devin Harris averaged 3.5 assists to 5 TOs
Jameer Nelson averaged 2.3 assists and 3.3 TOs
Derrick Rose averaged 5.5 assists to 4 TOs
My other worry about Reke is his A/TO in college isn't that great. Nelson I know had a pretty solid A/TO ratio in colllege, Rose was decent but not that great (both he and Reke played in the DDO which isn't a traditional O and doesn't have a traditional PG), and Harris was more of a 2 guard in college.
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
but he is also averaging 10 assists... evans is averaging 5 turnovers and 4 assists... there is a big difference.

why am i being attacked by all of these new booties?
I have a better question...WHY do you continue to poke sticks and take this into the realm of personal attack? The people responding to you are making articulate, intelligent answers to your points. The insult about "new booties" is totally uncalled for and irrelevant. Someone's ability to post cogent takes isn't based solely on how many posts they have. (Well, of course, except for me and Bricklayer. Ours are ALL pure gold.)

If you cannot stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen. You're the one who brought up a lot of stuff that is easily refuted and disputed. You can't be surprised to have worms in your shoes when you're the one that opened the can to begin with.

As usual board policy, this game discussion thread will be closed and transferred to the Games Archives before the next summer game.
 

bajaden

Hall of Famer
how can any of you say that evans is a better pg than jennings? jennings had just as many assists as our entire team which was 14 with only 4 to's... if beno had that kinda game you guys would be saying that he should be an all star.... i didnt watch the game so i cant say who dominated who but i can say that jennings did his job a lot better than evans did. if this were a regular season game jennings would still be 5-13... there is no way that evans would be scoring like that with the rest of the starters in the game. especially with the turnovers, beno or sergio would be taking his place in a heartbeat.

based on the box score evans game wasnt that impressive because there is very little chance that he would be able to get 19 freethrows on this team. if anything his game seems more like a sg than a pg.... he can pass the ball but so can kobe, tmac, wade, roy and lebron... doesnt make them pg's... im not bashing evans but i dont see how he can be the starting pg with so many turnovers... so far in summer league he is averaging more to's than assists.... he's scoring more than enough but damn....
You saw nothing, and you heard nothing. all you know is what you read in the paper and on this fourm, and yet, You know everything.. Brilliant. Why don't you give me a play by play of Custers last stand while your at it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.