Nice game. Stomped on an inferior team in the fourth. Our guards finally came to life, although I think the gods may not ever allow all four to play well together as Buddy was not good tonight.
The dude was SCRAPPING on D though. Not sure that means he should be getting starter minutes but he's not been a net negative for us at least.Can we please give L. King or Metu some of Moe's minutes?
3 points 1/4 FG and 5 reb doesn't make sense to play 32 minutes and start him.
Can we please give L. King or Metu some of Moe's minutes?
3 points 1/4 FG and 5 reb doesn't make sense to play 32 minutes and start him.
You’d regret this in 2-3 weeks or whenever Fox finds his form, trust me.Gosh I would love to flip Fox for a legit wing and run a Mitchell/Hali 1-2 with buddy off the bench.
I mean, if we somehow convinced the Bucks to trade us Giannis for Fox, I wouldn't be opposed to a deal.You’d regret this in 2-3 weeks or whenever Fox finds his form, trust me.
I think even Fox would be willing to drive himself to the Airport for that oneI mean, if we somehow convinced the Bucks to trade us Giannis for Fox, I wouldn't be opposed to a deal.
This made me laugh out loudTony New Orleans more like it
Gosh you guys are on FIRE tonight with the punchlines. Turn the sprinkler syst- eh, nvm.And where does the queue form?
Noel Harris @NorCalNoel916
Harrison Barnes scored 23 points and had just eight field-goal attempts. Talk about efficiency.
Not to nitpick, but I never really understood why some people refer to scoring more on less field goal attempts as efficiency, when the bulk of free throws are going to come from getting fouled while attempting a shot. Efficiency should be measured by FG% or EFG% or something closer to those stats than just shot attempts. If player X scores 20 points on 10/10 layups, why should he be considered less efficient than player Y who scores 20 points on 1 layup and 18 FTs that he drew attempting 9 layups? Or let's say in this case, if Barnes happened to be 1-8 FG, but took 10 more attempts and got fouled on them leading to 20 free throws, would we still say that was efficient?
The one time Luke has been consistent with an opening lineup or rotation, and i kinda want him to switch it up as well. Idk, hopefully when we do trade Bagley, we get a mobile big with some length that can actually defend a bit. That may be asking for too much and i don’t know if one exists, but that’s what i want for this team. Holmes can’t be the only “big” out there or the only one that can rebound in the opening lineup IMOCan we please give L. King or Metu some of Moe's minutes?
3 points 1/4 FG and 5 reb doesn't make sense to play 32 minutes and start him.
I’m really excited to be in the building for this one! My first game of the new season.Mitchell versus Ball?
![]()
I get what you're saying but Barnes was very efficient today 62% FG and 66% 3 PT. He hit two big (consecutive) 3s today and has been our most consistent player this season.Not to nitpick, but I never really understood why some people refer to scoring more on less field goal attempts as efficiency, when the bulk of free throws are going to come from getting fouled while attempting a shot. Efficiency should be measured by FG% or EFG% or something closer to those stats than just shot attempts. If player X scores 20 points on 10/10 layups, why should he be considered less efficient than player Y who scores 20 points on 1 layup and 18 FTs that he drew attempting 9 layups? Or let's say in this case, if Barnes happened to be 1-8 FG, but took 10 more attempts and got fouled on them leading to 20 free throws, would we still say that was efficient?
Considering that Barnes' eFG% for this game was 87.5, and his TS% was 92.7 you picked an interesting time to bring this up.Not to nitpick, but I never really understood why some people refer to scoring more on less field goal attempts as efficiency, when the bulk of free throws are going to come from getting fouled while attempting a shot. Efficiency should be measured by FG% or EFG% or something closer to those stats than just shot attempts. If player X scores 20 points on 10/10 layups, why should he be considered less efficient than player Y who scores 20 points on 1 layup and 18 FTs that he drew attempting 9 layups? Or let's say in this case, if Barnes happened to be 1-8 FG, but took 10 more attempts and got fouled on them leading to 20 free throws, would we still say that was efficient?
Not to nitpick, but I never really understood why some people refer to scoring more on less field goal attempts as efficiency, when the bulk of free throws are going to come from getting fouled while attempting a shot. Efficiency should be measured by FG% or EFG% or something closer to those stats than just shot attempts. If player X scores 20 points on 10/10 layups, why should he be considered less efficient than player Y who scores 20 points on 1 layup and 18 FTs that he drew attempting 9 layups? Or let's say in this case, if Barnes happened to be 1-8 FG, but took 10 more attempts and got fouled on them leading to 20 free throws, would we still say that was efficient?
I mean, if we somehow convinced the Bucks to trade us Giannis for Fox, I wouldn't be opposed to a deal.
I wouldn’t say no, but, Boston fans seem very frustrated with the guy. If Luke isn’t the coach, then i say yes with little hesitation.TATUM
Portland lost to the Cavs tonight. Yikes! Good news for us though. Every game matters in this difficult conference