Dreadnought
Bench

I feel like Kings need a PG, and I only like Kyrie Irving from this upcoming draft (meaning we might not get a pick good enough for him/he doesn't enter the draft). Could make sense.
![]()
I feel like Kings need a PG, and I only like Kyrie Irving from this upcoming draft (meaning we might not get a pick good enough for him/he doesn't enter the draft). Could make sense.
![]()
I feel like Kings need a PG, and I only like Kyrie Irving from this upcoming draft (meaning we might not get a pick good enough for him/he doesn't enter the draft). Could make sense.
I'd might do it if the pick is top 3 protected. Rubio's FG% is pretty low, so that's a concern. But If they added a few shooters like Redick and maybe Redd to the roster and just let Rubio run the point Rondo style, that could have a lot of potential.
Because he’s still a very good shooter and may be available fairly cheap. If he were picked up on say a 2 or 3 year contract, he could be an important role player in getting the Kings back to semi respectability.Why in the world would you want Redd? He's a mere shell of his former self.
Well I can’t speak for other people, but the way I see it, adding Rubio would be part of the rebuild. I think this team needs a true pass first point guard and from what I know of Rubio, that’s his M.O.For the life of me I don't understand the the infatuation with Rubio. How long would it be before people started calling for Rubios head? No one has any patience, or for that matter even understands how a team is built.
I’m still relatively new here so I don’t know what it was like in years past. But I can understand why fan frustration is at an all time high this year and surely that accounts for a lot of impetuous type of thinking and general lack of civility.but a lot of other clowns on this fourm. Insanity is starting to run rampant on this fourm, and I'm seriously thinking of leaving it. There's a lack of civility, and a lack of knowledge about basketball. I've been here for a while, and this is the worse I've ever seen it, and I just don't need the grief.
Insanity is starting to run rampant on this fourm, and I'm seriously thinking of leaving it. There's a lack of civility, and a lack of knowledge about basketball. I've been here for a while, and this is the worse I've ever seen it, and I just don't need the grief.
Give me a big smart shooting Guard, who can shoot.
Like who, anyone in particular you had in mind?
Mike Miller. Actually he's more of a SF, but he can play the 2.
Why in the world would you want Redd? He's a mere shell of his former self. For the life of me I don't understand the the infatuation with Rubio. How long would it be before people started calling for Rubios head? No one has any patience, or for that matter even understands how a team is built. And I'm not talking about you, but a lot of other clowns on this fourm. Insanity is starting to run rampant on this fourm, and I'm seriously thinking of leaving it. There's a lack of civility, and a lack of knowledge about basketball. I've been here for a while, and this is the worse I've ever seen it, and I just don't need the grief.
I'd rather you didn't leave - then the terrorists would have won. Maybe we can point them to a different forum, and let them go bucknuts over there.
I'd might do it if the pick is top 3 protected. Rubio's FG% is pretty low, so that's a concern. But If they added a few shooters like Redick and maybe Redd to the roster and just let Rubio run the point Rondo style, that could have a lot of potential.
Why in the world would you want Redd? He's a mere shell of his former self. For the life of me I don't understand the the infatuation with Rubio. How long would it be before people started calling for Rubios head? No one has any patience, or for that matter even understands how a team is built. And I'm not talking about you, but a lot of other clowns on this fourm. Insanity is starting to run rampant on this fourm, and I'm seriously thinking of leaving it. There's a lack of civility, and a lack of knowledge about basketball. I've been here for a while, and this is the worse I've ever seen it, and I just don't need the grief.
Unfortunately, Rubio is no Rondo.
Rondo was no Rondo either until he got the right team mates.
In terms of the type of player that they are, they're two wholey different types of beasts (aside from both being pass first guards). Rubio has yet to have shown the insane motor that makes Rondo so good.
Well that's all I was referring to, the pass first thing. I'm no expert but if Tyreke isn't going to be the PG, then a pass first PG is what the Kings need. I'm not sure what's avaliabe in next year's draft, but even if there is a PG like that there's no guarantee of getting them. Odds of getting one in free agency are pretty slim too. With those things considered, Rubio seems like a pretty good option to me. Let's say for example that The Kings traded next year's pick and either Dalembert or Landry for Rubio. They'd basically be swapping a high pick for a high pick (Rubio) and throwing in an expendable player (Landry or Dalembert). Then they'd be set at C, and PG, and have Tyreke to boot. That would be a pretty good "big3" to go forward with.
I’m just basically throwing out ideas here because clearly what The Kings are doing now isn’t working. I don’t have the answers but I think that if acquiring Rubio is doable, it’s something The Kings should at least explore.
The thing is that just having a point guard who likes to pass isn't going to mean success. The PG would have to have a consistent stroke, something that Rubio is far from having, and be able to defend, another thing that Rubio hasn't really proven himself capable of doing on a consistent basis. Throw in the fact that Rubio has yet to have played a game in the NBA and you ultimately have something that I would not be willing to give away our lottery pick, which right now can't be worse than 4, and a solid role player (not necessarily for us) for. And it's tough to make an assertion that that we'd be set at PG with Rubio seeing as he has yet to have played an NBA game or fully proven himself capable. If it was Paul or something, then yes, we'd be set, but not when it's a 20-year-old moptopped rookie yet to have seen the hardwood on American turf.
Fair points but all of them would apply to whoever they may draft, too. In the draft you have to consider a player's ceiling/potential. The draft is always a gamble and basically, I just see Rubio as a draft pick who played Euro instead of college. If Rubio has a higher ceiling/potential than a guard they might, key word might get in the draft, then I think it makes good sense to pursue him. I know it isn't ideal, but nothing ever is when you're at the bottom. Honestly, what better options are on the Kings table?
Fair points but all of them would apply to whoever they may draft, too. In the draft you have to consider a player's ceiling/potential. The draft is always a gamble and basically, I just see Rubio as a draft pick who played Euro instead of college. If Rubio has a higher ceiling/potential than a guard they might, key word might get in the draft, then I think it makes good sense to pursue him. I know it isn't ideal, but nothing ever is when you're at the bottom. Honestly, what better options are on the Kings table?
I know who we are going to take already.. Harrison Barnes. Kings will select 3rd and we will take Harrison Barnes and we will be pissed off that we drafted a guy who can't hit the side of a bard from 4pt land yet still for some reason likes to take them all the friggin time.
Then we will have a big argument here with people saying he can learn to shoot the 3 blah blah blah, and probably me alone saying he the kind of player who likes to create his own shot and would not fit with Evans, and how we needed a PG blah blah blah.. Then I will recommend we swap Barnes for Wes Johnson being that he CAN shoot outside, and does not worry about getting his own shot.
Mark this post.