Cousins was the reason
Cousins was the reason we were even IN the game.
Plus he carded a Double-Double [27 points and 12 rebounds] and did so with a shoulder injury.
Cousins was the reason
Cousins was the reason we were even IN the game.
when in this thread did I deny that? If a quarterback throws for 5 touchdowns but throws 1 huge INT at the end of the game and it costs that team the game, that's what will be remembered... that jump ball was the equivalent of an INT..thank god phoenix didn't score
IT DIDN'T COST THE TEAM THE GAME.
Your "yeah, but it could have" is totally and completely irrelevant.
Okay, i'm done. Even the naysayers agreed that what I am saying is indeed true, just bad timing, I'll take it.
Your semantics are wrong here. You're the naysayer in this situation. Most people's reactions after a dude's single-handedly carried a team to victory isn't to point out his flaws almost immediately after the buzzer rings.
Sorry, but this is right up there among the dumbest threads ever...especially after the effort and heart Cousins showed tonight. Facts are facts and so is nit-picking.
I am sick of seeing him dribble the ball up the court!!! Almost cost us the game today
Thanks for bringing the subject up. You beat me to it. I like Malone as a coach, but there is one huge freaking non sequiter in the Malone regime: Why does he allow Cousins to bring the ball up the floor? We saw it under Smart. We see it under Malone. It is nonsense and everybody knows it's nonsense. So why does it happen? He's not in kindergarten anymore. Not only is it bad basketball, it sends the wrong message to the rest of the team: there are special "Cousins rules" that others shall not follow. Unless we want to see Thompson play point guard? How about H? Yes, without Cousins the Kings would not have won. Hurray, we won. Despite Cousins playing point guard. When is Malone going to lay down the law?
indeed there are, and in fact there should be. he's the best player on the team by a rather wide margin. he's the franchise cornerstone playing on a max contract that he's already earning through ten games. he has tremendous gifts that few players his size have ever exhibited in the entire history of the nba. should DMC find a guard more often on the break? absolutely. age and experience will aid his decision-making in those scenarios. but should DMC be restricted from making use of his gifts simply because it's considered "special treatment"? absolutely not...
Oh, those ballhandling gifts are simply amazing. Rumblin, tumbling, bungling, look out mama, here I come... whoops, where did that ball go? It always amazes me when people defend the indefensible.
you don't have much sense for scale, do you? demarcus cousins is 6'11", 270 lbs. he's not going to look like magic when he gets out on the break. but the next time you see marc gasol do this, feel free to give me a ring:
yes, quite gifted, indeed.
Still defending the indefensible....
Oh, those ballhandling gifts are simply amazing. Rumblin, tumbling, bungling, look out mama, here I come... whoops, where did that ball go? It always amazes me when people defend the indefensible.
Again, given the quality of our PGs, I don't blame him one bit.
It's not indefensible. The defense is, he can do it, so let him do it. If anything, you bring in people that can help him refine his skill, and you help him with his judgement on when to pass, and when to take it all the way; you don't hold it against him that other centers can't do it.
But he can't do it. So don't let him do it. Have him work on his inside game instead of his point guard playmaking skills. When it's a 50-50 proposition getting the ball up the floor, you don't want to take the chance. As Clint has said: "A man's got to know his limitations."
we have multiple players that have proved they can play point guard better than cousins can
But he can't do it. So don't let him do it. Have him work on his inside game instead of his point guard playmaking skills. When it's a 50-50 proposition getting the ball up the floor, you don't want to take the chance. As Clint has said: "A man's got to know his limitations."
Game tape suggests otherwise.But he can't do it.
A man that knows his limitations, is a man that will never improve. Cousins is one of the best ballhandling big's in the game. If he wants to explore that part of his game on the floor, then so be it. To pick on Cousins, and not mention stupid turnovers by Vasquez, IT, McLemore, etc is ridiculous. We finally get a win, and Cousins was a huge part of that win. Do we have a thread praising him and the team? o! Instead we have this stupid, stupid, stupid thread picking on one play as a negative.
I don't question Cousins, I question the person that started this thread. He had to know it wouldn't be popular, and he had the chance to be negative in the last game, and in a couple of other games when Cuz didn't play up to expectations. Did he pick those games? NO!!!!! He picks a game that we actually won, and a game where Cousins played not only well, but we wouldn't have won the game if not for him. The word for that is Troll!!!!
I'm sorry, I have a bad cold, and I'm in a grumpy mood and not in the mood for unwarranted threads like this. This is the equivalent of a wagon train being surrounded by indians, and complaining that the cavalry got there a couple of minutes late. They should be grateful that the cavalry got there at all. There is a time and place for this, and this isn't it.
This thread is not created because of one play, he has done this for a long time. I didn't care if this thread would be popular or not, this is simply my opinion about Cousins. He gives me a heart attack every time he dribbles the ball up the court. We had one freakin win against an bledsoe-less Suns and you guys wanna act like everything is perfect, it's not. We should always be looking to improve.
Cousins is a dominant big man and making little changes like this can definitely help him improve his game.
Of course we should improve. Cousins is improving. Not sure how much can be done in a year.