TaxMan
Starter
I certainly understand all of that, and personally I'm not in love with Wiggins' game....HOWEVER, the argument for a trade like that is that he is a superior physical talent who in college actually was a very solid defensive wing. There is a greater than zero chance (do you like those odds?Amazing what a name brand can do for you. Wiggins is a negative player on a $5mil/season deal, it'd be absolute madness to bail out the Wolves from paying him the $30 mil/season he's owed for the next 5 seasons. I have no idea why some want to acquire a wing who doesn't rebound, doesn't defend, doesn't create for his teammates, takes low % shots, and hogs a ton of usage

With that said, I would be scared as hell that the player you see now is the player you get. And, after this many years in the league, is he now the player that he's always going to be?