The logic is flawed all the way around. The Kings won 17 games last season, the only changes to the core were mainly Tyreke and Omri, with a side bar of Brockness and Sergio. So any amount of wins over 17 were basicall brought on by these new additions, and its even more so because of Reke thanks to Kevin and Cisco going down. After 17 games, the Kings have won 9. However many wins they had last year at this point, subtract that to find out what Reke's impact has been.So, you're the authority on how many games they are supposed to win without Evans? By your logic....couldn't I say:
I expected the team to win 20 games this year. So if they end up winning 41, he's adding 21 more wins.
So, you're the authority on how many games they are supposed to win without Evans? By your logic....couldn't I say:
I expected the team to win 20 games this year. So if they end up winning 41, he's adding 21 more wins.
I think you're setting him up for failure with that thinking... Tyreke has been the biggest reason for the ressurectiong (along with other fine contributions from our young and veteran players). Yes, it is still sort of muddled whether he's a PG or a ball dominant SG, but to say that he has to take one of the worst teams, if not the worst (from last year's standpoint) to .500 is just absolutely insane... THis guy has impressed me. I thought he would struggle given that he has no jumpshot and never ran an offense as complex or as much before. I wanted Rubio bad, just like you. But I'm very happy with Tyreke. If he expands his offensive arsenal he will be dominant. You can plainly see that in his game. LBJ was a monster, you could see that in his first game, (Ironically vs us...) I really think you're doing a disservice to both LBJ and Tyreke by making that comparison.
im not comparing him to lebron, though the stats are hella similar... yes, im trying to bring hella back....
tyreke averaged 20/5/5 for the month of november, 18/5/4 if you add the 3 games in october... he would basically have to maintain his current pace for the rest of the season. thats not asking much. and you guys are seriously undervaluing the rest of this teams contribution for their 9 wins... beno if anyone would be a equal if not bigger factor in our wins than tyreke has been... if anyone has stepped up its been him. sergio when he gets minutes has played well and the bigs sort of take turns having good games.
The logic is flawed all the way around. The Kings won 17 games last season, the only changes to the core were mainly Tyreke and Omri, with a side bar of Brockness and Sergio.
He sure would be, good call. Hell, I think we should trade Tyreke for DJ Mbenga, I mean, what good is Reke anyway? Beno is the man, we don't need a triple double threat that the entire defense is so focused on scoring it makes other defenders leave them men to help contain him and make things easier for the other players. I'm going to start a trade Tyreke thread. Are you with me? Because Beno has been more of a reason why we have been winning these games lately, when Martin comes back thats all we will need. Beno back at the starting point and Martin as our sg. Lets do it.![]()
Very true, good point. I forget about that sometimes when I really shouldn't. The culture has definitely changed and the coaching staff is a big reason why.Don't forget that we also traded a bit of Reggie Theus and a lot of Kenny Natt for Westphal. I do believe that the coaching staff is responsible for a good bit of our improvement.
Don't forget that we also traded a bit of Reggie Theus and a lot of Kenny Natt for Westphal. I do believe that the coaching staff is responsible for a good bit of our improvement.
Very true, good point. I forget about that sometimes when I really shouldn't. The culture has definitely changed and the coaching staff is a big reason why.
Beno has been playing well, no doubt. But if you seriously think he is as much if not more of a reason why the Kings are winning than Tyreke then you have lost your mind. Beno is a great role player, but Tyreke is the star. There is no doubt about it, unless you want to make something up to continue to downtalk Tyreke, which it seems you have become quite proficient in doing, except nobody but 101 and swisssh will agree with you.that is how we got our first win.... beno, martin and hawes...
but seriously, beno has been playing out of this world for a back up pg... shooting a high % and few turnovers for the most part. he was such a drag last season... mbenga would be a nice backup center. though i wouldnt want to trade evans to the lakers... udoka for mbenga i would do in a heartbeat...
Beno has been playing well, no doubt. But if you seriously think he is as much if not more of a reason why the Kings are winning than Tyreke then you have lost your mind. Beno is a great role player, but Tyreke is the star. There is no doubt about it, unless you want to make something up to continue to downtalk Tyreke, which it seems you have become quite proficient in doing, except nobody but 101 and swisssh will agree with you.
You made it about Evans dude when you said that Beno was more of a reason why the Kings were winning games. A person could get booted fromt his website if they came out and told you exactly how you look to them. Brick broke a rule on here, but I thought it was well warranted and if I could get away with it I would too.do you remember how bad beno was last season? he was beyond horrible... this has nothing to do with evans, beno has been playing amazing(for beno) so far this season.
beno if anyone would be a equal if not bigger factor in our wins than tyreke has been
im not comparing him to lebron, though the stats are hella similar... yes, im trying to bring hella back....
tyreke averaged 20/5/5 for the month of november, 18/5/4 if you add the 3 games in october... he would basically have to maintain his current pace for the rest of the season. thats not asking much. and you guys are seriously undervaluing the rest of this teams contribution for their 9 wins... beno if anyone would be a equal if not bigger factor in our wins than tyreke has been... if anyone has stepped up its been him. sergio when he gets minutes has played well and the bigs sort of take turns having good games.
Living abroad I have only managed to watch 2 Kings games this year but I do follow this team daily.
I do understand that this is a Kings FANS forum but there is a bit to much fanboyism here.
I think Evans is amazing. A legitimate ROY candidate and a big piece of Kings recent success. But give credit where credit is due.
Thompson & Beno have improved considerably. Nocioni, Casspi and Brockman give this team much needed scrapiness (hell, KT as well). And yes, Kings have a coach this year.
The result of the TEAMS success is TEAM play. Evans makes the team better and vice versa.
Jordan once said that that there is no I in TEAM but there is an I in WIN. Evans can surely carry this team to success by himself. But not yet, not being a rookie with so much to learn. He needs a TEAM to help carry the burden.
Just my 2 cents.
No one is discounting that fact, guy. The main issue comes in giving BENO most of the credit for this season's turnaround. The most significant reason why this team has turned around is Tyreke. Everything else has just fallen into place. A great coach. Great role players. Great culture. Great philosophy. Super-Stud rookie. Have all been the reasons for this turnaround, but it wouldn't be so drastic without Evans. Thats the only point I'M making.
I think they are all 3 (pg's) replaceable with each other at the moment. As long as 2 are there we would be in the same place.
I think the biggest reason for the turn around is Westphal and the coaching staff. If you take away last years debacle we are really right were we should be now. They got us back on track. As for players, JT has been the best player so far.
Not even. Why? Consistency. Tyreke has been far more consistent, and he doesn't get into foul trouble and have to sit. Nice try though.
I do agree with you on the stats, altough 20/5/5 just means you are a natural scorer (which he is) that is being asked to run the offense (which he is) I am more impressed by how our team looks as a whole with him out there, and I want to see him improve his decision making, and running the team offense while still getting him integrated in the scoring. I just don't like how you said that he has to bring the team to 41 wins just to be considered impressive. I think he already is.
JT
PER 17.57
EWA 1.8
+/- +28
Evans
PER 16.87
EWA 1.7
+/- +4
Oh, and the +/- when both on the floor together is +13.
EWA Estimated Wins Added is Value Added divided by 30, giving the estimated number of wins a player adds to a team’s season total above what a "replacement player" would produce.
Oh, wasn't Evans in foul trouble the last game?
True, but Evans has shown a penchant for recognizing this and playing within himself, for example I forget the game but him, Donte and JT all were in foul trouble in the first half, yet Evans was able to play through it unlike JT who was eventually pulled and limited.
And your little PER statistic is not very telling so you can throw that out the window, as far as consistency is concerned. JT has his minutes limited due to foul trouble, Evans is rarely limited. And Evans statistics across the board have never been as up and down as JT's, the other night against NO was the first time JT had broken 20 pts in 7 games. JT has had 5 or more fouls in 10 games this season, Evans has 3, never fouled out yet either. He's more consistent, any way you cut it.
Why throw out PER? Because it doesnt fit your beliefs? Its not the end all, but it along with the other stats added together start to say the samething. Oh and look at my edit. JT has played 14 more total minutes than Evans.
So why can't you give JT some credit?
Why throw out PER? Because it doesnt fit your beliefs? Its not the end all, but it along with the other stats added together start to say the samething. Oh and look at my edit. JT has played 14 more total minutes than Evans.
So why can't you give JT some credit?
An off-topic on-topic or viceversa.
[yt=Assists]_-LtEJHthGg[/yt]