It's a different type of spectacle. Although there are less dunks, there is a lot of strategy. And a lot less marketing, star marketing, and numbers fever so It's more a chess between the coachs than a gladiator battle between franchise players. There's also much ball movement and passes, more court vision and more strategy. Less space=more genius.
I like more NBA than FIBA. It's funnier. And what I like more is the meta-game balance between the teams in terms of money. Here the difference of money to build up rosters between teams is gigantic, and for example this season with the crisis, Barcelona and Real Madrid have broken the league as they have zillions from soccer. But well, I have played in school and high school (and coached school teams while playing in high schol) I have seen so many FIBA basketball (I support estudiantes since 13 years ago) and I also love it, it's the basketball we play and we learn. It's much more deeper strategicly. It's funnier to see many dunks in a game, but see how a team makes an big point overcome in a quarter by changing the schemes it's also enjoyable. It's the better thing, enjoy both. And what I enjoy the most is seeing Spain trying to win a gold medal against the all-star USA until the last minute with courage and brain.
What I am more curious about the Sergio being the poor man's Rubio statement now I've been in this forums since the draft is how the marketing can blind people. Rubio is slightly better than Sergio, but not a lot better. Slightly better. Better defense (he ate Tony Parker in euro tournament) and a little bit less court vision. Rubio is a B+ in court vision, Sergio has the spark. The force is with him. He is touched. He doesn't need to see to pass (did you see the pass he did from the ground on that timeout basket turnover?). Rubio is 18, he debuted in ACB with 14, he will be a star, blablabla. But hell, Sergio has 23 and hasn't had a chance in Portland. He came as a first round draft and was buried by Nate McMillan during 3 years. If other team, with a more runing scheme would have drafted him that year, he could be a mid-top level starter PG right now. His last scoring record was 23...two years ago, where he did double digits:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YcqJ1sBLfU8
23 points 10 assists 4 rebounds 3 steals
I know that he can do what he did yesterday last night if he is given minutes and confidence (see the preseason match he played as starter). We wouldn't be world champions without him. Ask Nocioni...
Yes, he hasn't broken the Guiness of the youngest debutant of a FIBA team ever, but he also can be the next Nash. Rubio has more time to come better, but also maybe more time to come stupid and lazy as an hyped all-star-from-the-first-day. Sergio is a silent hard worker, but he needs to play with freedom to run the team. And I hope that, like Nash did, will become an all-star PG silently and patiently, maybe in 3, maybe in 4, maybe in 5 years.