hoops4kings said:On the radio today, Napear said that there has been no Artest talk at all within the Kings org. He said that he doesn't think Petrie will take a chance on a player that could set the team back 10 years if it turned out to be a disaster. He thinks Artest is too "out there" for Petrie's taste.
Wow. Interestingly enough, that's almost exactly what I've been arguing...

BigWaxer said:How would he set the team back 10 years? Thats the part I don't understand. This is a low risk deal, worst case is he sets it back that season he goes nuts in.
What would the difference be if Peja left and we get nothing return in the offseason because IMO that is what Petrie is gambling with right now. I think the set-backs offset each other.
Brick has always said it and it's more clear to me now that Petrie's love for Peja is going to kill us. Long run and short term.
It's not a low risk deal by any stretch of the imagination. Ron Artest could conceivably make Denis Rodman look like a choir boy. AND he could alienate a very large segment of the fan base, which could spell disaster for the arena, for the fan support, etc. Would it happen? No way of knowing, but the chance is there.
As far as Peja leaving and getting nothing in return, that is - quite simply - not going to happen. Petrie may like Peja but he's not a fool and he's not going to put Peja ahead of his (Petrie's) primary responsibility, which is to the Kings and the Maloofs. Just because we aren't hearing about anything, doesn't mean nothing is in the works. There is time for Petrie to make sure he gets the best possible deal, if trading Peja is going to happen. He has until Feb. 24 to either trade him or lock him up for one more year with an extension or sign him to a long-term contract. SOMETHING will happen by then, but don't expect much advance notice. Petrie doesn't work that way.
Last edited: