I put it in bold because I don't even know what it means, unless you actually were inferring what I presumed you were inferring.
I put it in bold because I don't even know what it means, unless you actually were inferring what I presumed you were inferring.
In general I'm throwing in with piksi here. I went to the game where he got boo'd. I saw the rest of the games on TV. The team was nowhere near as good as a team when Webber returned (in general, specific games - yes).
I agree that he should have sat out until the next year. I also think the Kings would have had a better record than they did after Webber returned. Does this mean they win it all? No, but I think they would have been a better "team". I don't think they would have done any worse.
His return was just botched and it threw the team in a tailspin. Now they may not have gone any farther in the PO without him, but I thought they should have tried. That team was cohesive and having fun. After Webber's return, not so much.
This statement is not incongruous with my position. I am not claiming that Webber's return didn't muck up the chemistry and make the team worse. What I am claiming is that the team wasn't really *that* good to begin with. I am claiming that their success was the result of a beneficial schedule, and that claims of the Kings being the best team in the league before Webber came back are overblown to the point of being fabricated.In general I'm throwing in with piksi here. I went to the game where he got boo'd. I saw the rest of the games on TV. The team was nowhere near as good as a team when Webber returned (in general, specific games - yes).
This statement is not incongruous with my position. I am not claiming that Webber's return didn't muck up the chemistry and make the team worse. What I am claiming is that the team wasn't really *that* good to begin with. I am claiming that their success was the result of a beneficial schedule, and that claims of the Kings being the best team in the league before Webber came back are overblown to the point of being fabricated.
We were well pased the "let's be cohesive and have fun la la la" stage of our ascension at that point. It was title or bust. Title or failure. Webb was the key to that title. Our soft and flashy weenies would have died in Rnd 2 without Webb anyway -- the hope all season long was ALWAYS that the soft and flashies would get back their big PF and boom! Best in the league. Did not work out that way, but it was the shot that had to be taken.
I think they knew their roles and were playing well and that all got jumbled up with Webber's return (the way it was handled, whoever's fault that was....another discussion for another time, or maybe never as that horse has been beat already).
Yeah, I know, except that was for a healthy Webber, not what we got back when he returned.
I would imagine the knees are alot harder to get over than a thumb. i don't expect mike to be to rusty i do however expect kevin to be tentative about the high jumps until he knows for sure it won't happen again.
...praxis
Tonight's game should be fun! I sincerely hope to see #23 in uniform and out there on the court.
![]()
so John Salmons is hurt now too??
and Brad Miller has the flu?
this team is cursed
lolIt's more challenging that way.
Cisco's shot looks good