Bigger gets you nowhere unless you have big guys that are actually good like the Lakers.
Well, in Cousins, Thompson, Hickson and Dalembert (has we kept him) we would have had size, the good size. Our frontcourt schooled the Lakers' frontcourt after we traded Landry and started playing the traditional 3 man rotation in Dalembert - Cousins - Thompson.
Had we kept Dally, at the very least improved the 3rd man in that rotation (Hickson > JT).
Our big guys were good and we started troubling teams with out size in the interior after the all star break last season, hence why we started playing the sort of basketball that would get you into the playoffs in the west.
I am yet to be convinced that we actually got better. In fact, I think we might have gotten worse.
I think we should be a little better witb additions of Jimmer, Hayes and even Salmons...but losing Sammy D and losing out on AK...left us to play small ball now. I think a 30 win season is realistic.
I can see the Salmons thing working. I really do. He is better than anything we had going at that spot for the last 2-3 years. I can also see how it can backfire in a bad way but I can see the thinking behind it. We needed a veteran who could handle the ball, shoot the 3, defend well and pass the ball (he is a good passer when he wants to be) so I thought it was a good upgrade at the position and insurance policy if we come out of the free agency empty handed.
Even Hayes, I can see the thinking behind it (although I think the price is too high). Before the lockout this is what I wanted us to do and I think we would have been in a much better spot:
1. Re-sign Dalembert and Thornton
2. In ideal world sign AK47 but if we bomb out of that one, Salmons is there as an insurance.
3. Sign a veteran big man that would not play major minutes but could step in in case of injury and play good D and good minutes. I mentioned a younger version of Kurt Thomas. Hayes here would be great but might be a bit too much of a luxury.
4. Sign a 3rd veteran PG who won't play much but would provide cover for injury. He would need to be a decent 3PT shooter and a good defender. I mentioned Earl Watson as the type of player I would be targeting.
5. Sign the rookies.
In terms of other team's FA, I wanted AK47 because of his versatility. He would be out SF who would provide some great D on bigger SF of the league. He would be ideal for those quicker PFs that game Dalembert some issues last year. The Carl Landrys and David Wests of this world.
That would provide us with so much versatility and depth for virtually the same money that we would spend to date. We would remain tall and trouble the opposition. Would still have interior shotblocker to anchor our D. We would have a versatile SF that can guard multiple positions, including some PFs. We would virtually go at least 2 deep at every position and would only need some time for everything to gel and watch out.
Now we are shorter, less athletic, have no shot blocker or interior defensive anchor. I think we were better constructed at the end of last season than we are now and that is the scary thing considering we have used a good chunk of our cap room and didn't improve significantly.
I also think that Beno's leadership and influence will be missed more than people realise. He was very valuable to us and was earning the contract for the last 2 years.
I think we should be a little better witb additions of Jimmer, Hayes and even Salmons...but losing Sammy D and losing out on AK...left us to play small ball now. I think a 30 win season is realistic.
ALL THE AK47 TALK CAN STOP NOW
SORRY TO BREAK THE BAD NEWS BUT CARMICHAEL DAVE POSTED ON HIS TWITTER A FEW HOURS AGO " 99501 #NeverMind" f.y.i 99501 = zip for ancorage alaska "AK" so it looks like ak47 turned us down....DAMMIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Care to translate? I understand "ak47 turned us down", but not the rest.
Not being a local, has all the talk about AK47 died off? Has there been actual conformation the kings offer was rejected or is this all based on Carmichael Dave?
Correct. Weekdays only.I assume Grant probably only has a radio show on the weekdays?
I assume Grant probably only has a radio show on the weekdays?
Fair assumption. Figured one of the local writers would have posted something somewhere...
Fair assumption. Figured one of the local writers would have posted something somewhere...
Well in that case, I'm sure we'll get some sort of update whenever he comes on the air.
I expect that people in the area will call in to inquire, if he doesn't address it before-hand.
Our local writers actually covering the Kings?? You must be joking! Most of them prefer the sensational stories as opposed to covering the actual news.
I'm glad AK declined our offer. I'm not a fan of him.
+1..
5, 6 years ago I'd be psyched if we could get AK47 in purple...But the dude is oft injured, and oft pouty. Would rather not overpay a guy in the decline of his career.
..Plus I'm insanely optimistic about Honeycutt.
Pouty? You're worried about AK being pouty, after signing a spanking new deal, while we have Salmons and Cousins on the team?
Why do you say AK is on the decline? I'd be curious to hear.
Exactly! We have enough folk with iffy attitudes on the team, and a coach who is TURRIBLE with his players (where for art thou Rick?)...Dont need to add another.
And look at AK47s stats, they speak for themselves (as far as the decline)...
I mean, I wouldnt mind if we signed him, he'd definitely be an upgrade over Salmons and fit a need, but I'd hope the contract is heavily frontloaded.