AleksandarN said:This is what I am talking about. His defense a non factor?It is funny that you talk about some of Pedja funs being over zealous and then you go to the other extreme. It is too bad that we can not get a happy medium for all of our players. It seems to me both sides goes too far when cheering for the players we have. I will not kid myself Pedja is my secound favourite player in the NBA (Kobe being my first) but that does not mean I turn my blind on his weaknesses( rebounds and not aggressive) and blame other players or team for his shortcomings. UI said it numerous times it is up to PEdja to define what type of player his is and will become. This playoffs and next will be it for him to prove to everyone what kind of player he is.
The other extreme is to say his defense is a liability. A non-factor means it's a wash. Or do you think a happy medium is that he's good at defense? I can say he's better than most King players. Put him on a so-so team like Memphis or Washington and he's average. I choose to see the glaring weakness of the other players, not deluding myself into thinking Peja is some kind of defensive force. I don't think Peja boosters have gone as far as to say he's a defensive player of the year candidate.
I'm a fan of Peja too. I'm just not the kind of fan that'll say he doesn't make his own mistakes. He's corrected his mistake off the court. But if he doesn't show up more consistently on the court, I don't think the Kings should want him back even if he does say he wants to stay. Mike Bibby is good, but seriously... Peja can be much better. Now that Webber is out of the equation, there is no reason why Peja can't be the focus of the opponents' defense. Instead, that role has been given to Mike Bibby. He is team leader AND the team's best player.
I'm starting to suspect a lot of Kings players are probably overrated (not just Peja). I think they just look good cause of the system which confuses defenses. But once that system starts slowly crumbling, it exposes everyone's individual games, or lack thereof.
Last edited: