[Grades] Grades v. Bulls 2/3/2016 (with actual grades included)

I am disappoint of this game?

  • Where was Rondo?

    Votes: 3 5.5%
  • Where was Rudy?

    Votes: 1 1.8%
  • Nice choke Cuz.

    Votes: 6 10.9%
  • I'm with Cuz, why the hell take WCS out down the stretch you smallball loving has been?

    Votes: 20 36.4%
  • Now a Cuz/Randy Brown beef?

    Votes: 1 1.8%
  • Who the hell is E'Twan Moore?

    Votes: 11 20.0%
  • What the hell was that foul by Rondo in the final minutes?

    Votes: 4 7.3%
  • Karl not fired before his presser.

    Votes: 9 16.4%

  • Total voters
    55
  • Poll closed .

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
amusing-unamused-fish.jpg





Boxscore

Stats: 31min 12pts (5-13, 0-2, 2-2) 6reb 1ast 1stl 1blk 1TO
Summary: so he follows up a hero game with just a head scratcher. Never engaged or focused, hurt us most of night.

Gay ( D ) -- slow and fugly start missing things he does not miss and not looking in rhythm as for no reason at all 3/5 of our starting lineup did not show up. Finally got a post move for only his second score of the game in the last minute of the first half. Some crap play in the third, but got fired up belatedly and made a good defensive play and a quick hit to get us within 1. Continued missing easy ones around the rim however, and down the stretch was of little use. Best that can be said is that he snatched a few aggressive rebounds in front of Pau, and that he left the mysterious head slapping late game foul to Rondo this time.

Stats: 18min 2pts (1-4, 0-0, 0-0) 5reb 0ast 0stl 2blk 0TO
Summary: looked out of rhythm most of night, then finally started having an impact and yanked by Karl for stretch run. Boogie not amused.

Cauley Stein ( C ) -- was wildly forcing too much over people in the early going and kept losing contact with his man on defense. Finally came to play a little in the early 3rd with a block and a finish courtesy of Cuz, but was removed on schedule in the mid 3rd even though Cuz was hobbling and seemed like the guy to take out. Probably lucky to get a third stint given Karl and was finally helping stiffen our late game defense when suddenly Karl pissed off half the fanbase and the whole Boogie as he suddenly yanked Willie from the game with 4:23 to go in favor of the ineffective Rudy. Nowhere near one of Willie's best, but Karl displaying all the symptoms of smallball amnesia syndrome late.

Stats: 37min 30pts (12-25, 0-3, 6-11) 11reb 4ast 3stl 2blk 6TO
Summary: one of a handful of guys who could go 30-11-4-3-2 and have a mediocre game. Beat up and out of sorts all night. Then choked.

Cousins ( B- ) -- for some reason started out the game facing up in a tactical decision that made no sense given the state of the Bulls interior defense. Nor would that change most of the game as rather than punish Taj Gibson's twerpiness, we instead had Boogie facing him up and playing right into his game rather than muscling him in the post. Looked physically sluggish from the start, and over the course of the game would absorb a bunch of other damage ot various parts of the body that had him looking like a gimpy 40yr old by the end of things. Was better on defense than offense early, not moving fast, but the only guy challenging anything (amusingly becoming the first King to get up into Moore and stop him, then picking off an attempted give and go behind him too). Got his hands on a lot of balls as the Bulls repeatedly tried to pass it behind him and he kept on snatching and deflecting the passes. But nothing was falling early until he came up with a brilliant spin move past Gasol in the latter stages of the first, then boom, he was off, and scored 4 quick hoops before leaving. Hit a number of midrange jumpers, but the mix was too jumper heavy overall. Real issue all game long though of the team just feeling out of synch, and that was reflected in a game long turnover problem whenever we tried to run the offense through Boogie and have him dump it off to guards. The passes were off, or the cuts were off, or guys didn't catch or just whatever, but pass after pass didn't reach the right guy and it was damaging. Could see him visibly going into want to win mode late, but was pissed off much of the game (who's hand did he swat off his shoulder on the bench, and what was the thing with Randy Brown afterwards??), out of sorts, got visibly pissed when Karl sabotoged us by taking out WCS late, and "want to win" several times devolved into "f it, I'll do it myself" stuff. Continued to make defensive plays to keep us in it though, including a huge block with 28 seconds to go that gave us a legit chance. But on this night this had to end poorly, and out of the timeout at the 18 seconds mark we chose rather than go for a three, to go to Boogie inside, and he blew two layups over a smaller man, and effectively killed us. When intentionally fouled next possession, he then proceeded to miss the firs FT + missed the second on purpose, and we ended up getting 0pts out of the big guy on two straight possessions in winning time. And so that's how a guy can go for 30-11-4-3-2 and it not be a signature game. He tried and battled, but seemed to be fighting us as much as them, Looked banged up and unhappy at generally everyone. Needed more help, and came up short when asked to do it himself.

Stats: 36min 18pts (7-14, 3-7, 1-2) 4reb 0ast 3stl 0blk 4TO
Summary: one of two guys (DC) who really showed up to help Cuz tonight, and even so it was on one end of the floor.

Belinelli ( B+ ) -- came out again looking more comfortable, and I am wondering if maybe we shouldn't just stick with this. Hit three early jumpers as the only guy doing anything until Cuz snapped online mid quarter. And they were in rhythm sorts of shots. Feet set, or suddenly coming aroudn a screen and getting square rather than still moving sideways on the curl. Nor was he primarily responsible for the E'Twan Moore travesty, as of Moore's first 5 FGs Marco was only defending the last one (Willie twice, Rondo and Gay on the others). first hit by Belinelli along the baseline. Hit several well timed threes, none bigger than the one he hit with 1:23 to go with an opportunity for a 4pt play to suddenly give us a chance...and then he bricked the FT. Why? Got down on the ground for a steal next possession to give us another chance, but we just started doing everything wrong. Not a perfect game by any stretch, but a legitimately good one, and looked much more comfortable than he has in forever.

Stats: 31min 6pts (3-9, 0-1, 0-0) 2reb 9ast 3stl 0blk 4TO
Summary: maybe this one was turf toe, I don't know, but for the third game in a row was flat, and we were better with Collison.

Rondo ( D- ) -- I have very few notes on Rondo's game because he did very little except ocassionaly blow a layup around the rim. This went beyond the mere passing woes he suddenly started having a few games ago, and went to a larger complete lack of impact of any kind. He was invisible, even as a floor general, and we were flat better with Collison out there this night. We'll call it turf toe if we have to, but provided little support, and then in the final two minutes made another one of those bizarre hey let's lose the game plays we have been doing around here ever since..well we started to lose again for the last decade. 1:32 to go, a 5pt game, and suddenly for no reason Rondo hops over and intentionally fouls the Bulls in the backcourt. Didn't even try to play defense. The controversy is whether a coach had that piece of idiocy for him, or he came up with it himself, but game after game our guys are killing any chance we have to win games with late game brainless play, even from the brainy ones.
 
Last edited:
Bench

Stats: 24min 10pts (4-7, 2-3, 0-0) 6reb 1ast 1stl 1blk 0TO
Casspi ( C+ ) -- another game filled with long stretches of invisibility, but grabbed some d-boards and did step up for some individually nice plays. Just like the rest of the team could not sustain anything. Finally got in the scoring column to close the first with a pretty step through in the paint. Terrible second shot attempt in the early 2nd casually pulling up for a half hearted three and basically airballing it. Just one of those shake your head plays. But recovered with a straight on feet set three from Cuz and came up with great defensive block on Snell inside. Just...where is that effort every play anymore? One of our effort leaders seems to be lost a lot of the time, or taking plays off. Rattled in another three early in the 4th to cut the lead back to 3, but would be the last we heard from him, and Karl bizarrely refused to reinsert him in the final seconds when we needed a three "because he liked the team we had on the floor", even though that team did not include one of the league's best 3pt shooters.

Stats: 30min 19pts (8-11, 0-2, 3-4) 2reb 2ast 0stl 0blk 0TO
Collison ( B+ ) -- perhaps our most effective offensive player of the game. Note I said offensive. Nonetheless clearly one of only a handful of guys who gave us a game. Came right in and immediately gave us scoring push, and not the wild stuff either. Outside of two missed threes, he was highly efficient everywhere else, and hit 8 of 9 on 2pt attempts. Some quick busts up the court in transition of course, but also found seams in the halfcourt. Now unfortunately as always with us, the problem came on the other end where DC couldn't guard anyone. Even when he did guard them he was too small/weak to have an effect. Most of the time Rose just bumped him out of the way and penetrated at will. And with this time Rondo being the drag on the pairing, Karl's fascination with his 2PG sets killed us. Strong offensive game, in the first half in particular, but ain't nobody getting no A's no how if they're part of the defensie problem in a loss.

Stats: 15min 0pts (0-1, 0-0, 0-0) 5reb 1ast 0stl 2blk 0TO
Koufos ( C- ) -- a largely invisible game from Kosta saved by a few stands inside. But he didn't even bother trying to score this time, and proved largely unable to handle Pau defensively. Took up some space, bought Cuz some time, grabbed a couple of good rebounds, and was about as far from making an impact on winning as you could be this time.

Stats: 18min 5pts (2-4, 1-2, 0-0) 4reb 3ast 1stl 0blk 1TO
McLemore ( C+ ) -- missed his first in rhythm three. Started the second with another miss and looked to be on his way to one of those games. But he got a corner three off of good ball movement, and that inspired a little burst of strong all around play. He got another score, made a good pass ahead for an assist, an unusually strong rebound in traffic -- you will notice that his statline was not the normal 6-1-1 type stuff, but rather a well rounded 5-4-3. Played well in the 2nd quarter when it looked for a while like we might be snapping out of our funk. But then int he second half fell victim to Karl's need to smallball as he was forgotten about for a late 3rd quarter stint while we wasted time with our mini-PGs, and when he did come back for the early 4th, he pressed, sucked, turned it over, and was yanked. So basically a little 2nd quarter work that probably deserved a little more 2nd half run, but did not duplicate his play anymore than he often does as a starter.
 
Last edited:
so many valid options...can't choose just one.

I eventually chose pulling WCS, but I think Brickie should have made this poll multiple-choice.

Bottom line? I think George Karl is slowly losing his grasp on reality. His post-game interviews make no sense at all. I believe Kayte C. who says Rondo looked over to the bench to see if he should intentionally foul.

I wanted George Karl. I thought he was the answer. I stood on the corner waving the flag as the parade went by. But that was then. This is now. I do not think we can afford to keep Karl much longer. I'm going to rewatch this game (for as long as I can) with the sole intention of counting the number of times I think a coaching error was made. I suspect the number will be staggering.
 
Correction: We ain't winning with this coach being very stubborn pushing his flawed, outdated system on a roster built for something different!

This!

Tinker with the roster maybe, but we can go somewhere with a legit coach.

As opposed to a senile has-been who seems to be willfully ignorant as to the blatantly obvious strengths and weaknesses of our roster.

We're better than this.
 
This!

Tinker with the roster maybe, but we can go somewhere with a legit coach.

As opposed to a senile has-been who seems to be willfully ignorant as to the blatantly obvious strengths and weaknesses of our roster.

We're better than this.

I guarantee you that no matter which coach we bring in there will be some fans who want us to play differently and who say we are not playing to strengths. For example: all the talk of Cousins being on the perimeter yet his % on jumpshots was way better than his post attempts.
 
I guarantee you that no matter which coach we bring in there will be some fans who want us to play differently and who say we are not playing to strengths. For example: all the talk of Cousins being on the perimeter yet his % on jumpshots was way better than his post attempts.

You think cuz shoots a higher % away from the basket?
 
Not overall, this game (and I'm thinking of midrange rather than 3s). And last game as well.

I didn't count this game but overall he's a far better shooter close to the basket which is the point you were trying to counter. It's great he can mix it up but we aren't going to win playing no d and having our star center attacking like a guard
 
IIRC, Karl wasn't even coaching during the play that Rondo was looking to the bench for instructions. Karl was meandering about, doing nothing cohesive.
It looked like Chad Iske was motioning to Rondo to do something (and may have been telling him something), then Rondo intentionally fouled based on that (incorrect?) communication.

Either way, the coaching for this team looks to frequently be nigh-incompetent.
I wish I could watch an entire game just staring at Karl and see what he's actually doing on the bench/sideline.
Like I posited weeks ago, I'm not entirely sure the guy is actually coaching, and may be daring Vlade to fire him.

Did anyone catch his post-game presser?
I was proud of the local reporter who actually directly asked Karl "If Casspi is your best 3-pt shooter, and you needed a 3-ptr to tie, why wasn't he in the game?"
Karl dodged him like an experienced politician by saying, "I just didn't like the team we had out there."
He threw Rondo under the bus by blaming him for the foul. He'd better be right that Rondo inexplicably brainfarted, because that's the kind of comment that will have the team start airing dirty laundry in public.
More bafflement ensued when he said, (paraphrased) "I don't know why they keep coming out flat at the beginning of games."
Someone knows what's wrong with this team.
And if the head coach doesn't know, then he's obviously the problem.
 
Last edited:
I didn't watch the game. Why was Casspi out in the last 8 minutes?
His stats don't look too bad, and he's usually there on the court at the end of tight games.
 
I didn't count this game but overall he's a far better shooter close to the basket which is the point you were trying to counter. It's great he can mix it up but we aren't going to win playing no d and having our star center attacking like a guard

Well for the most part after the slow start we've had him in the post a lot more. I thought he was visibly camped outside a lot more this game with the intention of having Rudy post inside. My point is that in this game it's not so clear that having him space the floor (ie on the perimeter) was the wrong choice.
 
IIRC, Karl wasn't even coaching during the play that Rondo was looking to the bench for instructions. Karl was meandering about, doing nothing cohesive.
It looked like Chad Iske was motioning to Rondo to do something (and may have been telling him something), then Rondo intentionally fouled based on that (incorrect?) communication.

Either way, the coaching for this team looks to frequently be nigh-incompetent.
I wish I could watch an entire game just staring at Karl and see what he's actually doing on the bench/sideline.
Like I posited weeks ago, I'm not entirely sure the guy is actually coaching.

I doubt the players would hear if Karl gave instructions from the sidelines because his voice is damaged. This is by no means meant disrespectful, it just is what it is. Thats why Iske is doing all the in game instructions.
 
Few games more ... once it's certain, meh screw it blow it up. We ain't winning with this team.

Can't blow it up every year, eventually you have to keep some pieces around other than Cousins to keep some kind of consistent play or we will get slow starts every year.
 
Can't blow it up every year, eventually you have to keep some pieces around other than Cousins to keep some kind of consistent play or we will get slow starts every year.

We've got pieces. Its damn hard to tell how many because we are nearly as dysfunctional when it comes to winning as people thought we might be. But there are lots of keepable pieces here. But the glue is missing. Somehow everything is out of whack and experiencing rotating failures.
 
We've got pieces. Its damn hard to tell how many because we are nearly as dysfunctional when it comes to winning as people thought we might be. But there are lots of keepable pieces here. But the glue is missing. Somehow everything is out of whack and experiencing rotating failures.

They have no identity.

During that 5-game winning streak, it seemed as though everyone (including whomever was coaching) was on the same page. That's gone again, though, and I'm looking at George Karl with skepticism and cynicism.

Your worst prognostications may have been right, Brick. And damn, I hope you know how much I detest saying that!
 
Back
Top